Tenants have stopped paying rent after notice given

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Tenants have stopped paying rent after notice given

    I recently issued an SP1 notice to my tenants of 6 years, giving them 2 months notice. My plan is now to sell the property.

    Since then they have stooped paying the rent, I hold their deposit (1 months rent - value less than the current 1 months rent) with the deposit protection service. If they leave the property owing the 2 months rent am I able to use that deposit to cover the arrears? Obviously, it's a concern as I will not know the state of the property until they leave, but hoping all is OK. The deposit won't cover 2 months missing rent but at least it will be something.

    I know within the protection service you have to raise a dispute to make a claim on the deposit, but do they allow rent arrears as a reason for disputing the deposit?

    Any advice will be greatly appreciated.

    Rent arrears are claimable agains the deposit.
    The deposit doesn't limit your claim against the tenant, so you can use the small claims process to (try to) recover anything the tenant owes.

    When they owe two month's rent - which is usually after they miss the second payment, you can serve notice under section 8 which might a) make the tenants realise you are serious and b) allows for a quicker route to repossession and a court order to pay what's owed.
    When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
    Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).


      Is an SP1 supposed to be an s21?
      I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...


        What makes you think the tenants will leave when the notice expires? The Government statistics on recovery of possession shows that the average time if the tenants don't cooperate is around 41 weeks.


          Rent stopping is VERY common after a GENUINE "no fault" notice issued. Amateurs take heed! Maybe the tenant needs to save for a new property rent/deposit/fees? Maybe they don't understand their obligations or an act of retaliation?

          If a LL really needs property back to sell he should tread very carefully. Far more than 2 months should be given and the tenant should be helped to secure new accommodation IMHO. This is where I have sympathy with the Labour Party calls (Ed Milliband). Why should a LL cause major disruption/cost to a PERFORMANT tenant's life to simply "cash in" their "investment". Please, no carping from so called "accidental" landlords either.


            John Duff,

            Its hard to isolate this example from the problems with the rest of the system though. Landlords use s21 rather than s8 for rent arrears, anti-social behaviour, damage and a range of other breaches because the court system is defective and they can't have confidence that their case will be treated fairly and in a timely manner. s21 suffers from these problems too of course but at least if they get the basics right they will certainty of possession.


              Agree with what you say. However, I stated GENUINE "no fault".


              Latest Activity


              • Reply to arrears and damage
                by Hudson01
                I applaud you on your forward thinking in regards '' tailing '' them, very smart. I agree with the above comments, i feel for the new landlord...... and in my opinion if you had, had the opportunity to evict them and their two children it is not you who is responsible but the adult who has decided not...
                11-07-2020, 18:16 PM
              • arrears and damage
                by Dougie99
                Hi, I have recently had 2 tenants leave Mother and daughter and 2 kids. They had been in arrears since Feb and left owing £2130.

                I had £1040 deposit signed to me and they signed an agreement to pay arrears over 12 months, they moved out a day before they said they were going to and moved...
                11-07-2020, 08:10 AM
              • Reply to Rent Guarantee Insurance
                by AndrewDod
                I guess the only point ever to insure is if

                a) You think they have calculated a too-low premiums based on the (correct) information you gave (extremely rare) so that you will statistically "win"

                b) If the event (if it occurs) will be life changing. Like medical travel...
                11-07-2020, 18:14 PM
              • Rent Guarantee Insurance
                by oi2004as

                I would be interested in your view on the following

                I received a renewal Legal & Rent Guarantee Insurance documents from Rentguard (which initiallyy I purchased through Openrent)

                There is the following condition in their 'statement of fact':
                11-07-2020, 11:59 AM
              • Reply to Rent Guarantee Insurance
                by Section20z
                Insurance can never pay out more than it takes in premiums so you're on a hiding to nothing. The only way you'll ever win on insurance is if you have below average luck, but in that case you'd probably also find you'd forgotten to pay the premium 🤔
                11-07-2020, 18:04 PM
              • Reply to Rent Guarantee Insurance
                by AndrewDod
                Yes, RG insurance is pretty much a waste of time. And this is a ludicrous clause at so many levels. I'd drop the policy....
                11-07-2020, 17:56 PM
              • Reply to Break Clause in AST - Recommendations Please
                by AndrewDod
                I think closer to 10 to 14 months in many places - pre virus. 4 months almost never happens anywhere with a tenant who resists in any way. In that time they can basically steal £15K.

                This average of 4 months will include the 90%+ of tenants who leave voluntarily having been served no...
                11-07-2020, 17:52 PM
              • Break Clause in AST - Recommendations Please
                by landlord-man
                I wish to add a Break Clause into our ASTs - actually, I'd like to put two in there if possible................


                To allow either the Tenant or the Landlord to exit the Tenancy after 4 months.


                To allow the Tenant (not the Landlord) to exit...
                11-07-2020, 15:54 PM
              • Reply to Break Clause in AST - Recommendations Please
                by KTC
                Well yeah, but whether it's wise, and whether it has the effect you intended are different questions.

                A landlord cannot legally evict their tenant except through the courts obtaining an order for possesion and then having that order executed by bailiffs or High Court enforcement officers....
                11-07-2020, 16:56 PM
              • Reply to Break Clause in AST - Recommendations Please
                by theartfullodger
                General advice is to avoid break clauses as they are notorius for being difficult to get valid (only way to find out if they are valid would be in court if tenant and/or landlord sues the other one).

                First doesn;t need a break clause: Simply make initial fixed term of AST only 4 months:...
                11-07-2020, 16:47 PM