Redbridge imposing strange restriction

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Redbridge imposing strange restriction

    I have applied to convert a shop/office premises into 2 studio flats

    Today they have come back asking that before I proceed I must agree to sign an agreement that should I be granted permission and should the project complete - I would be liable to contribute to some kind of Community Projects to do with health or the like - but cannot give a precise amount

    Sounds to me like modern day blackmail/robbery - has any else come across a similar stipulation.

    Ahh, Planning Gain.

    Seems a bit harsh to impose it on such a small development. I would certainly ask
    a, what section of Planning Law they are using to enforce this demand.
    b, how are they going to calculate the contribution.

    Get THEIR answers to these questions, don't rely on what someone will undoubtly (and pointlessly) post answering these.

    Then you can seek the right advice on how to mitigate any charge.
    There is always scope for misinterpretation.

    If my posts can be interpreted in two ways, one that makes you feel angry and one that doesn't, I meant the latter.

    Everyday is an opportunity to learn something new.


      You will find that since 2008 when the Government changed legislation regarding residential development, many local planning authorities have been able to impose a section 106 agreement on any application that creates a new dwelling.

      Sums of money are calculated based on future Education needs, transport infrastructure needs, open space requirements and other local services because of all these "extra users" that the new dwellings will generate.
      The sum required is calculated on the number of bedrooms to show the number of potential occupants.

      In my own area a 2 bedroom property now needs a sum of £9,000, 3 bedroom is £12,000 and 4 bedroom is £15,000.

      Most LPA's have cheerfully adopted this new procedure, so I think t you will find that there is a Supplementary Planning Document that has been passed by the LPA that explains this change when dealing with a planning application for residential development.

      The days when a planning application was low cost are now another example of the good old days.


      Latest Activity


      • Chimney pot gas compliance
        by Perfectgame
        Out home is a Leasehold ‘house’ jutting out from a refurbished Grade2* building comprising 55 apartments. Ours is the only one with gas supply to the C19th chimney. We had a gas fire recently installed, but the chimney pot did not comply with the gas fire. According to the freeholder the existing...
        23-03-2020, 15:11 PM
      • Reply to Chimney pot gas compliance
        by AndrewDod
        Is this the first gas fire in this spot -- why does it have a gas supply?
        If you plan to make some amendment to your flat why do you feel other lessees should pay the cost?

        In this whole thread I think we need to be careful of words -- "responsibility" versus "rights"...
        23-03-2020, 17:49 PM
      • Reply to Chimney pot gas compliance
        by JK0
        I wouldn't argue IIWY. Plenty of freeholders not only charge lessees for doing the job, but bung on hundreds in fees also. Sounds like you have consent to do it yourself, doesn't it?
        23-03-2020, 15:48 PM
      • Reply to Chimney pot gas compliance
        by Interlaken
        What does it say in your lease about walls, roofs and structures outside the confines of your 'house' - that is where the answer lies. Ask the Freeholder to explain why he thinks it is not his responsibility. Usually it is the freeholder's responsibility.
        23-03-2020, 15:31 PM
      • Question on Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL)
        by Clulass
        I realise its not the best time to consider a development project given that the world is about to shut down and maybe end, but it helps distract me, from our impending doom.

        So to my question:

        Am I right in thinking that there is no CIL payable.....IF.... you are converting...
        14-03-2020, 21:29 PM
      • Reply to Question on Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL)
        by Interlaken
        CIL payments depend on which local authority you are in. In my area of work and having a Neighbourhood Plan in place 25% of CIL did go to the plan area for use in the community but suddenly our new Unitary Authority banned this so CIL goes into one big pot to be bid for. This does not please me and...
        23-03-2020, 09:34 AM
      • 1 bed to 2 bed conversion
        by slix_88
        Hi all

        First time poster here after lurking on these forums for the past week. I've just put an offer on a large 800+ sqft 1 bedroom flat and was hoping to get your input with regards to the Building Regulations. For a moment, I am assuming the landlord / freeholder may refuse consent under...
        14-03-2020, 14:46 PM
      • Reply to 1 bed to 2 bed conversion
        by leaseholder64
        I think there may already have been an unsafe modification, in that the kitchen door seems to have been removed. I'd expect that to be a fire door.

        If this is on the 27th floor, I'd say you were definitely creating an unsafe inner room, as the escape root passes through two high risk ...
        18-03-2020, 10:13 AM
      • Reply to 1 bed to 2 bed conversion
        by slix_88

        Sorry, thought I'd bump this! I'd be very keen to get any input on this.

        18-03-2020, 01:03 AM
      • RICs Valuations or Estate Agents Appraisal
        by MAPTON
        Not sure which section I should post this question!

        A house in a very good residential location - normal 3 bed semi's sell for £330k (recent sale a few doors away) - this would be a standard 2 double bed with a box room and a family bathroom. The adjacent semi, on a corner plot has...
        10-03-2020, 15:53 PM