trespass, adverse possession ?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • rico1313
    started a topic trespass, adverse possession ?

    trespass, adverse possession ?

    I have an unusual situation…

    We live in a Victorian terrace. The ground floor of our neighbours is a commercial premise – take-away.

    The metal chimney runs up the side of the building at the back – right next to us.

    We have an issue with noise, smells etc – since a new powerful extractor fan was installed a few months ago.

    The cowl (top of the chimney) hangs over our property and drips down on to our balcony. The chimney has been there (we think) 20 years.

    So, here’s my question.

    We have asked that the chimney have a new cowl put on to reduce noise and fumes. The occupiers (not the landlord) have agreed to this and we hope that this will work.

    If it doesn’t work, we need to get the council involved.

    The chimney is actually held to the back wall by large brackets. These brackets are on our property. In fact the chimney itself is on our property (by about 3 inches I think).

    I’d like to know if we would be able to claim a trespass and have the chimney moved? – I know this would make life with our neighbours difficult and would be a last resort.

    There is no doubt in my mind that they are using our land, but would there be some case for adverse possession? It has been there for a lot longer than us and I wouldn’t want to threaten legal action without being able to back it up. The owner is, I’m told, a right *** and so I’d want to be quite confident.

    I’m happy to post pictures or more information if that would help? Thanks a bunch to anyone that can offer a bit of advice on this.

  • Lawcruncher
    replied
    Originally posted by rico1313 View Post
    It does seem odd that someone can basically build on to your land - not the end of a garden/ fence type issue - but right on to our balcony and then have this allowed simply due to time.
    The laws which allow the acquisition of rights over land by long user have two functions: One is to ensure that there comes a point where there is certainty - and as to that the law does allow more than sufficient time for action to be taken. The other is to correct the deficiencies of the conveyancing system and the failure of parties to property transcations (if not their conveyancers) to cover all the angles. The law really has to say that the same rules apply in all situations.

    Originally posted by rico1313 View Post
    This chimney actually drips fat on to our balcony too. I spoke to the local fire service and they were very interested in visiting them. Again I resisted this on the basis that I want to get it resolved amicably. No going back from creating a real problem between us.
    If the fire service are interested I think that needs to transcend all other considerations. If there is a fire hazard it needs to be eliminated. Call them in.

    Leave a comment:


  • rico1313
    replied
    Thanks for the help and advice. Kind of what I thought, but wanted am expert second opinion.

    It does seem odd that someone can basically build on to your land - not the end of a garden/ fence type issue - but right on to our balcony and then have this allowed simply due to time.

    This chimney actually drips fat on to our balcony too. I spoke to the local fire service and they were very interested in visiting them. Again I resisted this on the basis that I want to get it resolved amicably. No going back from creating a real problem between us.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lawcruncher
    replied
    There are two issues here: trespass and nuisance.

    If the trespass has been going on for over twenty years permament rights have probably been obtained. In any event the encroachment looks to be minimal. This avenue is not worth exploring on its own, if for no other reason than that the problem will not go away if adjustments are made to put an end to the encroachment.

    The real issue is the nuisance. I think you need to concentrate on working with the neighbour to reduce the noise or the hours when the fan is in use. If there is no progress you can report the issue to the council. Taking proceedings for private nuisance has to be an absolute last resort.

    Leave a comment:


  • rico1313
    replied
    Oh, also.. I'm guessing there's a party wall issue here too, but as it has been there so long it might be irrelevant?

    I'm thinking that trespass is the most logical (after going through the council for nuisance)? Is there a time limit on small trespasses?

    Leave a comment:


  • rico1313
    replied
    Thanks for the reply.

    Lease has nothing about the chimney. In my view it was put up while the property was rented, although I have no way of knowing this for sure.

    Freehold - I'm co-owner.

    The chimney was there when we moved in, but it's only now that it is making so much noise that I can't get to sleep until it stops at about 11.15pm.

    Leave a comment:


  • jpkeates
    replied
    Does the title deeds/lease have anything about the chimney?
    Who owns the freehold (if it's not you)?

    Leave a comment:

Latest Activity

Collapse

  • Chimney Removal from the roof
    Tomasz
    As a part of roof renovation works we want to remove external part of the chimney (above the roof line). The house is semi detached, the chimney is located in the outer part of the house and is not part of any party wall.
    The condition of the chimney is quite bad and we prefer to remove everything...
    05-07-2019, 09:11 AM
  • Reply to Chimney Removal from the roof
    Tomasz
    That's right!
    We are only removing the part above the roof line, and the example recommendation from leaseholder64 might be more applicable when some parts of the chimney would be removed from inside of the house, which is not the case.
    Many thanks you both for a prompt reply!
    05-07-2019, 14:59 PM
  • Reply to Chimney Removal from the roof
    Tipper
    Well reading that document I see no reason to talk to Building Control at all! All that is being proposed is removal of the top of the chimney to below the roof line. As long as suitable ventilation is provided at the new 'top' then just get on with it.

    I say this from having researched...
    05-07-2019, 14:26 PM
  • Reply to Chimney Removal from the roof
    leaseholder64
    Building Control definitely needs to be notified, see, for example, https://www.tendringdc.gov.uk/sites/...20PDF%20V2.pdf
    05-07-2019, 11:10 AM
  • Reply to Chimney Removal from the roof
    leaseholder64
    I would have a word with building control Demolition work tends to be notifiable and the change in weight distribution may affect the structure.

    I'm not sure about planning permission, but I don't recognize it as being a permitted development.

    You may well find that a photograph...
    05-07-2019, 11:02 AM
  • property access issue?
    legepe
    Hi all
    Couple of questions, Im looking to make a planning application to change a commercial B1 property to residential (property build around 1820)
    The building has had historically (I think an original door) and still physically has in place the doorway but which leads out to a neighbors...
    04-07-2019, 19:09 PM
  • Reply to property access issue?
    buzzard1994
    First thing you need to find out is whether the property has any right of access over either the driveway or the pub car park. Presumably it has a right of access from somewhere?
    04-07-2019, 19:44 PM
  • listed building consent
    Stacker
    Damp Proof Course what have been your experiences with applying for planning and listed building consent for a modern damp proof course where there is not one already and the groundfloor flat is damp?
    22-06-2019, 16:25 PM
  • Reply to listed building consent
    Stacker
    Yes agree with you leaseholder 64 however the leaseholder was told by his surveyor that a DPC would do the trick so to speak however this advice can not be followed as listed building consent is required which would not be given as a modern DPC for a listed building would be a BIG no no and seen as...
    23-06-2019, 19:58 PM
  • Reply to listed building consent
    leaseholder64
    Is the lower part of the wall at least 150mm above ground level? If not a DPC is not really an option. (I'm not quite clear about the ground is higher sentence, but it sounds like it means that the damp wall is below ground level.)

    In any case, my feeling would be that, on an old building,...
    23-06-2019, 19:12 PM
Working...
X