Highways adopted Land still registered to dissolved building company over 20 years

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Highways adopted Land still registered to dissolved building company over 20 years

    Hi All

    I wonder if anybody can help me with what seems to me a complicated issue regarding registered ownership of retained land by a dissolved company of 20 years ago.

    The retained / registered land is now a hammerhead road which was adopted by the highways whilst the builder was insolvent, they were dissolved in 1996,
    The highways fully adopted the road/land in 1993, but it is still registered to the dissolved builder? and a charge is also registered to a bank?
    I own a plot of land adjacent to the hammerhead of which i have outline planning permission and therefore access onto my land.
    My questions are as below:
    1, As the highways adopted this hammerhead does this mean in principle i can connect the services under the road without any issues of the dissolved builder knocking on my door later when the property is finished and claiming that i have invaded his land?
    2, Do the highways own this adopted land surface and subsurface,
    3, Does the crown own the land (after highways adoption)

    I'm a little confused as to which direction to go and who to get a definate answer,
    any help greatly appreciated

    thx n rgds

    T

    #2
    I would contact the relevant utility as they tend to have precedence over property rights.

    However, if the freehold has reverted to the Crown, it will be because of the dissolution of the property company, not because the land is now maintained at public expense.

    Being a public highway and being adopted are not the same thing. I think you can have either without the other.

    Comment


      #3
      How will i know if the land has reverted back to the crown due to the company being dissolved, the land title is still in the company name?
      Is this the normal process and the crown don't change the title?
      If the crown now own it by default do i have to contact the crown solicitors to get approval for the utility services to be connected under the road?

      Comment


        #4
        If the freehold has reverted to the Crown (or a Duchy) the Crown will do nothing except sell it to someone with a reasonable interest in the land. Land itself is technically always owned by the Crown.

        Such orphaned land is very common, because it has no real value, so of no interest to the company's creditors. However, I don't have the expertise to say whether or not those creditors have any claim.

        In any case, utilities generally don't have to obtain permission to access any land, but the expertise will lie with the utilities, so you should ask them.

        Details of Land Registry procedures for dissolved companies are in https://www.gov.uk/government/public...ate-insolvency I think it would be dangerous for me to try an summarise anything from it based on a quick scan.

        Comment


          #5
          i will contact the utilities as you advise and also the administrators just to find if there are anymore loose ends

          thx

          T

          Comment

          Latest Activity

          Collapse

          • Freeholder running business in common areas?
            Benzo
            Hi guys

            I live in a small block of flats. We have some common land in front of the block which used to be gardens when the flats were originally built, but which were converted into a car park about 15 years ago. This was done at residents expense as it was intended for residents sole...
            30-12-2017, 10:44 AM
          • Reply to Freeholder running business in common areas?
            Benzo
            I've finally got through to the council who told me that residential car park to commercial car park does not constitute a planning breach as the land use (parking cars) has not changed.

            They did suggest that the freeholders should have consulted us on this change (which they did not) before...
            17-01-2018, 12:07 PM
          • Demise of the loft
            Affinity
            We are three leaseholders sharing the freehold of a property (which is divided into three flats).
            The recent buyer of the top flat asked for the loft to be demised to her (in exchange for her being responsible for the repairs of the roof/gutters). We have amended the lease and demised the loft...
            19-12-2017, 21:33 PM
          • Reply to Demise of the loft
            ram
            This thread is about getting nothing for the loft and nothing for the roof, and the concequences of giving everything away for free, and having only one person / leasholder having sole responsibility for the roof, and being unable to afford a new roof when the time comes.
            Your arguments have validity,
            ...
            15-01-2018, 18:47 PM
          • Reply to Demise of the loft
            Vassena
            I believe what RAM says is incorrect.

            For residential properties, if the lease of the upstairs flat now includes the loft space and roof (owning the roof de facto means you own the airspace above as per Davies v Yadegar 1990), then the Freeholders have no right to ask for a premium for...
            15-01-2018, 10:37 AM
          • another roof terrace dilema
            boss1234
            Hi there,

            I know there have been several posts on this before but each case poses a new problem.

            I puchased a flat 4 months ago with share of freehold with 3 other flats. It is on the first floor of a house conversion, with the main bedroom stepped down at the rear of the property...
            12-01-2018, 14:21 PM
          • Reply to another roof terrace dilema
            leaseholder64
            Planning permission usually has about a two year time limit, although you need to look at the actual decision to find this out.

            If you believe the roof is now overloaded, you could raise a building control violation report with the council.

            The entity (company or tenants in...
            12-01-2018, 14:40 PM
          • Share of Freehold (House converted into 2 Flats) - looking to add a basement
            kmac110
            Hi,

            I have share of freehold and a long lease over the ground floor flat and the front garden.
            The Freehold covers 2 leases - the ground floor and the upstairs flat.
            The lease for the flat upstairs covers the complete 1st floor.

            I'm looking to build a basement extension...
            03-01-2018, 15:31 PM
          • Reply to Share of Freehold (House converted into 2 Flats) - looking to add a basement
            MisterB
            and if they agree IN WRITING then make sure your building engineered calculations include additional weight due to potential loft conversion...
            10-01-2018, 07:56 AM
          • Boundary wall question
            Neil2011
            Hi
            I own an end of terrace house. The pervious owners had put an extension onto the side which sits right on the boundary line with the house next door. This is a semi detached property. The house next door had attached a basic lean to garage/shed onto the extension wall. The house is undergoing...
            08-01-2018, 10:59 AM
          Working...
          X