Freehold Company's MoU prohibits payment of dividends.

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Freehold Company's MoU prohibits payment of dividends.

    Hello, this question was in part a follow on from the "Demise of the Loft" thread below relating to a leaseholder wishing to develop the roof space in their block.

    I bought a leasehold flat in a large block that included a share in the Freehold company. There is a very large, unused basement which could be converted to create new residential unit. Also, the block occupies a large plot that includes a ransom strip over access to separately owned garages that would be an ideal site for development.

    I believe that one day the opportunity of a windfall may arise for the FH company.

    However, the terms of the Freehold company's MoU appear to prohibit any such money being paid out as dividends (wording below). Is this the case and if so is there any incentive at all for the FH to grant licences or entertain development opportunities, etc? I should add, there is already a very healthy sinking fund and no major works are expected any time in the foreseeable future.

    "The income and property of the Company shall be applied solely towards the promotion of the objects of the Company as set forth in this Memorandum of Association and no portion thereof shall be paid or transferred directly or indirectly by way of dividend, bonus or otherwise howsoever by way of profit to the members of the Company providing that nothing in this clause shall prevent the payment in good faith of reasonable and proper remuneration to an Officer or servant of the company, nor prevent the payment of interest at a rate not exceeding a reasonable market rate on money lent or reasonable and proper rent for premises demised or let by any member of the company."

    The objects generally all relate to "preserving, improving, managing, developing, rendering valuable or turning to account, any property, real or personal, belonging to the Company or which the Company is interested".

    Is it limited by guarantee? If so that would be a natural consequence.

    Where I've normally seen such clauses is for charities, but I think it is more generally a condition for companies to be treated as not for profit, for tax purposes.

    If by shares, you can change it, by special resolution, but you should get advice on the tax implications.


      Thanks, it's a private company limited by shares (Ltd).

      I guess on the flip side it means there's less motivation for the FH to push for a large premium should I apply to extend myself.


      Latest Activity


      • Freeholder running business in common areas?
        Hi guys

        I live in a small block of flats. We have some common land in front of the block which used to be gardens when the flats were originally built, but which were converted into a car park about 15 years ago. This was done at residents expense as it was intended for residents sole...
        30-12-2017, 10:44 AM
      • Reply to Freeholder running business in common areas?
        I've finally got through to the council who told me that residential car park to commercial car park does not constitute a planning breach as the land use (parking cars) has not changed.

        They did suggest that the freeholders should have consulted us on this change (which they did not) before...
        17-01-2018, 12:07 PM
      • Demise of the loft
        We are three leaseholders sharing the freehold of a property (which is divided into three flats).
        The recent buyer of the top flat asked for the loft to be demised to her (in exchange for her being responsible for the repairs of the roof/gutters). We have amended the lease and demised the loft...
        19-12-2017, 21:33 PM
      • Reply to Demise of the loft
        This thread is about getting nothing for the loft and nothing for the roof, and the concequences of giving everything away for free, and having only one person / leasholder having sole responsibility for the roof, and being unable to afford a new roof when the time comes.
        Your arguments have validity,
        15-01-2018, 18:47 PM
      • Reply to Demise of the loft
        I believe what RAM says is incorrect.

        For residential properties, if the lease of the upstairs flat now includes the loft space and roof (owning the roof de facto means you own the airspace above as per Davies v Yadegar 1990), then the Freeholders have no right to ask for a premium for...
        15-01-2018, 10:37 AM
      • another roof terrace dilema
        Hi there,

        I know there have been several posts on this before but each case poses a new problem.

        I puchased a flat 4 months ago with share of freehold with 3 other flats. It is on the first floor of a house conversion, with the main bedroom stepped down at the rear of the property...
        12-01-2018, 14:21 PM
      • Reply to another roof terrace dilema
        Planning permission usually has about a two year time limit, although you need to look at the actual decision to find this out.

        If you believe the roof is now overloaded, you could raise a building control violation report with the council.

        The entity (company or tenants in...
        12-01-2018, 14:40 PM
      • Share of Freehold (House converted into 2 Flats) - looking to add a basement

        I have share of freehold and a long lease over the ground floor flat and the front garden.
        The Freehold covers 2 leases - the ground floor and the upstairs flat.
        The lease for the flat upstairs covers the complete 1st floor.

        I'm looking to build a basement extension...
        03-01-2018, 15:31 PM
      • Reply to Share of Freehold (House converted into 2 Flats) - looking to add a basement
        and if they agree IN WRITING then make sure your building engineered calculations include additional weight due to potential loft conversion...
        10-01-2018, 07:56 AM
      • Boundary wall question
        I own an end of terrace house. The pervious owners had put an extension onto the side which sits right on the boundary line with the house next door. This is a semi detached property. The house next door had attached a basic lean to garage/shed onto the extension wall. The house is undergoing...
        08-01-2018, 10:59 AM