I'm one of four leaseholders in a converted house. Earlier this year the managing agent commenced the S20 process for the regular four-yearly external decoration.
The leaseholders, collectively, have been busy/lazy and lulled into a false sense of security by historic costs: over the previous five cycles, the low quotes received have ranged from £1950-£3150 and the high quotes £2300-£4250.
So is came as something of a surprise to be hit with the 'Statement of Estimates' letter stating that they received quotes of £8900 and £10700 and they intend to proceed with the lower quote.
We quickly provided a quote for £4500 from the company who conducted the work in 2013, but this has been rejected on the basis of being 'too late'.
Assuming that the S20 procedure has been followed to the letter, do we have any grounds for rejecting the £8900 quote on cost grounds? It bears absolutely no relation to 'market realities', but appeals to the managing agents' good nature, sense of professional pride, etc etc aren't going well and they're digging their heels in.
It seems wrong that we can be held to a lower quote which is approaching three times anything we've ever paid before, and more than double the highest quote we've ever received.
In the absence of a nomination from the leaseholders, what would our legal position be if the managing agents had returned with quotes of £400k and £500k?
Any advice gratefully received!
The leaseholders, collectively, have been busy/lazy and lulled into a false sense of security by historic costs: over the previous five cycles, the low quotes received have ranged from £1950-£3150 and the high quotes £2300-£4250.
So is came as something of a surprise to be hit with the 'Statement of Estimates' letter stating that they received quotes of £8900 and £10700 and they intend to proceed with the lower quote.
We quickly provided a quote for £4500 from the company who conducted the work in 2013, but this has been rejected on the basis of being 'too late'.
Assuming that the S20 procedure has been followed to the letter, do we have any grounds for rejecting the £8900 quote on cost grounds? It bears absolutely no relation to 'market realities', but appeals to the managing agents' good nature, sense of professional pride, etc etc aren't going well and they're digging their heels in.
It seems wrong that we can be held to a lower quote which is approaching three times anything we've ever paid before, and more than double the highest quote we've ever received.
In the absence of a nomination from the leaseholders, what would our legal position be if the managing agents had returned with quotes of £400k and £500k?
Any advice gratefully received!
Comment