First Tier Tribunal (ex LVT) Expected Costs

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    First Tier Tribunal (ex LVT) Expected Costs

    A charity in which I am involved owns a freehold house on which the tenants have correctly served notice to enfranchise. We have agreed a price (over £100k) but since then their solicitors have gone silent for several months, despite our chasing.
    We have threatened to go to First Tribunal (Property) if they do not complete but no success yet.
    Is anyone able to advise what our costs are likely to be if we go to Tribunal (as I believe both sides are liable for their own costs)? And if we go to Tribunal, get a price set, but then they still do not complete, can we then reclaim our Tribunal costs from them?

    Why do you want to go to the First Tier Tribunal ?

    They have asked to enfranchise, and if they don't want to take it any further, then they don't.

    You cannot force anyone to buy / enfranchise.
    You can't force anyone to buy your car when they ask how much it is and they will call round Friday and pay you but don't turn up. Do you take them to a tribrunal ? no you don't.


      Maybe they dont have the 100K to pay.


        Then they won't reply and no one can force them to reply, as per post number 2.

        Unfortunate for the person asking the question, but that's life.



          Unfortunately it is a bit more complicated (and legal) than offering to buy a car.
          When the tenant applies to enfranchise, the freeholder (the charity in this case) is forced to start incurring costs, and the tenant who has applied is liable for those costs whether he goes ahead with the purchase or legally withdraws.
          Even more importantly, if the tenant does not legally withdraw (paying the freeholder's costs), he can revive the enfranchisement at any time and crucially the valuation of the freehold is calculated as of the date he first applied.
          In our case, property prices have risen by more than 20% since he first made the application and, roughly, that means that the cost of the freehold has also risen by 20% (actually a bit more because the lease is now shorter). In other words, we have agreed a price of £130k, but if the identical house next door were to apply today, the price would be around £170k.
          If he withdraws, he has to start again, at the current, much higher, price. If he doesn't. then even if the market value of the freehold rises to £1 million, he can revive his claim at any time and pay just £130k.
          Unfortunately the only way we can force him to either withdraw or go ahead (rather than just keep the right to buy the freehold at around £130k for ever) is to apply to the Tribunal. I hope that explains my question.


            You could always take it to auction. That may spur them on.


              But isn't the enfranchisement claim deemed to have been withdrawn if not completed within a certain length of time? A matter of months iirc.
              After deemed withdrawal I thought the process had to be started again and not before another two years had lapsed which I assume means a new claim and revaluation and, new costs.


                Response time by either side should be within 2 months from last letter. Enfranchisement is always difficult if one or two in the group can't raise the money for their contribution.



                  I was advised otherwise by our solicitor. In fact I was specifically told there is no time limit and the leaseholder can reactivate the claim at any time unless he has officially withdrawn it. It would be great if someone could confirm that our solicitor is incorrect?



                    You say as property prices have increased 30 percent the freehold price will have increased by the same.

                    However isn't the freehold value mainly based on ground rent, which will not have increased in line with leasehold prices.

                    So, you would only see a 'marriage value' rise. What length are the leases??


                      Thanks, andybenw,

                      If it was a Section 9 (1) valuation, you would be correct: much would depend on the ground rent.

                      However, this is a Section 9 (1A) valuation [also called Special Valuation Method, for high value properties], so the ground rent is almost irrelevant: the valuation is all about Reversion to Value, which basically follows the market value.

                      The lease has about 60 years left and the property is worth around £1.75 million, so the stakes are quite high.

                      Also the charity is a "real one": none of us gets paid and all the money we receive is used to provide grants for education to those who otherwise couldn't afford it for various reasons. Getting the money in would mean we can help more children. I know this is totally irrelevant to this thread and this forum but I hope it helps to explain why we would like to get this resolved.


                        I hate wading in on these but if I recall, the notice lapses one month after the offer is made, but he is still on the hook for costs, where the tenant does not give notice to withdraw or does not proceed.

                        I don't think that you are stuck on the price as the offer has lapsed. Send them the bill
                        Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.


                        Latest Activity


                        • Share of feehold/shared service charges?
                          by Stu1020
                          Hi there,

                          I'm new to the forum and looking for advice on a sticky freehold situation.

                          I own a two-bed flat in a converted building with two one-beds. The lease states that a fair proportion is payable towards the service charge. However, there has been a running agreement of...
                          20-05-2022, 11:39 AM
                        • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
                          by Gordon999
                          Since your flat has 2 bedrooms and other flats have one bedroom, you should keep the existing 38:31:31 split as fair contribution to the annual service charge account.

                          For lease extension, the cost is mainly solicitors charges plus registration charge at Land Registry and Mortgage Lender.(...
                          28-05-2022, 10:48 AM
                        • Reply to Building works & S20 process
                          by Gordon999
                          The S20 consultation with leaseholders is required for any planned works which exceed £250 cost per flat.

                          If any planned works are quoted below £1000, you could place the order on the supplier with lowest quote. .

                          If the freeholder is self- managing the building maintenance,...
                          28-05-2022, 09:56 AM
                        • Building works & S20 process
                          by RichA
                          Hi. I have a freehold after selling a leasehold flat in a block of 4 flats. We don't currently have a managing agent, so these duties currently fall to me (I am holding off appointing a managing agent whilst the leaseholders consider whether they want to RTM).

                          The block needs some maintenance...
                          21-05-2022, 17:20 PM
                        • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
                          by sgclacy
                          You appear to have bought into the flat knowing at the time your share is 38% and having owned the flat feel that this is unjust.

                          Did you raise any concerns questions at the time of purchase that in a three flat split you would be paying more than 33.33% . Could it be argued that the unfairness...
                          28-05-2022, 09:04 AM
                        • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
                          by eagle2
                          The cost of extending a lease is not a service charge expense so there is no reason to allocate it on the 38/31/31 basis, your offer to split those costs equally seems to be reasonable. It is up to the freeholder to decide what is fair and reasonable for the service charges and it is up to the other...
                          28-05-2022, 05:29 AM
                        • Reply to Old managing agents accounts
                          by eagle2
                          Unless the handover took place at the end of the financial year, it is the RTM's responsibility to produce the annual accounts. You could try making a formal complaint against the agent to supply copies of all supporting documents, it should belong to a redress scheme. The difficulty is that the agent...
                          28-05-2022, 05:05 AM
                        • Old managing agents accounts
                          by jazzythumper
                          Since obtaining the RTM and changing the managing agent, we have never been given full accounts / receipts for the previous year(s). We believe that as the old freeholder and leaser holder of one of the flats were represented by the same solicitor that prior to the sale of the freehold, we were subsidising...
                          20-05-2022, 11:21 AM
                        • Reply to Freehold confusion
                          by CStevens

                          The property should be registered so the land registry should hold a copy of the leases. You would need to look at the leases to see who is responsible for what but normally in a maisonette situation the freeholder would insure and maintain the structure, foundation and roof with...
                          27-05-2022, 21:58 PM
                        • Freehold confusion
                          by davetg
                          30 years ago I bought a flat from a friend. The freehold at the time was registered to my friend and the lady who owned the other flat. I understood at the time that I would replace the friend on the freehold but this never happened. This was not a problem until now as when work on the structure of...
                          24-05-2022, 14:29 PM