Annual leaseholder 'AGM's Good or bad?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Annual leaseholder 'AGM's Good or bad?

    Hi, sorry for yet another RTM question!

    The RTM Model Articles say:

    "Directors may delegate

    10.—(1)*Subject to the articles, the directors may delegate any of the powers which are conferred on them under the articles—
    (a) to such person or committee;
    (b) by such means (including by power of attorney);
    (c) to such an extent;
    (d) in relation to such matters; and
    (e) on such terms and conditions;
    as they think fit.

    (2)*If the directors so specify, any such delegation may authorise further delegation of the directors’ powers by any person to whom they are delegated.

    (3)*The directors may revoke any delegation in whole or part, or alter its terms and conditions.

    11.—(1)*Committees to which the directors delegate any of their powers must follow procedures which are based, so far as they are applicable, on those provisions of the articles which govern the taking of decisions by directors. "

    Presumably Art 10 allows empowering a constituted tenants association to act as a management committee while the RTM Board retains financial control? Or perhaps authorising an individual (who may not be a member of the company or even a flat owner) to do something in its name, as distinct from the RTMCo engaging professionals under contract?

    Aside from the tangled web of possibilities of empowering individuals to do whatever the Board sees fit on whatever terms and conditions it sees fit, is it wise to contract with an agent who insists on calling a "leaseholders annual meeting" for all flat owners (non company members and company members alike) to discuss and agree spending priorities and the level of service charge and place the RTM directors merely in the position of 'final review' of pre-agreed decisions?

    It sounds great 'open democracy' unless you are a director.

    Non-attendance means you aren't interested and thus have no say, even if you are a company member. The meeting is formally minuted as a company AGM but without Directors Report, company accounts etc. Non-company members have an equal vote and the directors face an interesting situation if they feel unable to agree to the open democracy (for which they are personally liable).

    My response has been to argue (a) only a constituted entity can have an AGM of its members; (b) flat owners are not an 'entity' unless they join something with a consitution under which umbrella decisions can be taken at formal meetings; and (c) the RTM company should call a company AGM (issuing calling notices, resolutions and proxy votes to the members etc) and invite non-members with no voting rights, as they can always join the blessed company if they want a vote.

    Informal leaseholder meetings do not anyway circumvent s20 consultation no matter what is agreed by those present. Annual leaseholder meetings sound like a policy made for the convenience of the agent?

    Or has my Nelson complex, paranoia and jaded cynicism run away from me?
    Do not read my offerings, based purely on my research or experience as a lessee, as legal advice. If you need legal advice please see a solicitor.

    Either the agent is very good by ensuring that all leaseholders have say, or they don’t understand what an RTM is.

    I will assume that you want to sort this out so in the first place a meeting that discusses last years accounts in the current year and about next year’s budget is not a lot of use.

    The RTM and its board are those that make a decisions about expenses and the budget, but it is no bad thing to involve all residents in doing so.

    Once a draft budget is agreed and options identified then a letter setting out the assumptions and asking for comments can work, as can an open meeting. The board can then consider those responses and take a vote and if they feel the need explain that it is not binding on the company.

    That said why invite argument if the responses are sensible and constructive?

    In turn questions are always asked about current expenses and any agent can produce a report which identifies the cash position against current budget breaking down the actual expenses and how they project that will compare to the current budget by year end.

    The RTM can continue to hold its AGM and appoint officers and adopt the accounts etc. But it is unlikely that the timing and adoption of the prior year accounts can tie into a budget as its likely the budget year will have started before accounts are ready or otherwise they are very very late!

    In practice to avoid duplication and interminable meetings it is best to be practical about this until there is serious rift between leaseholders and members.

    Lets say you have a year in December. By April May you should have the AGM to deal with the boring statutory stuff, and you can then do two things
    1 discuss matters some of which you can investigate and carry forward
    2 Start the AGM at 7 and as the business is mostly routine start the Residents meeting at 7.30. If there is need to be very anal about it members get a red card and leaseholders get a yellow card so the meeting deals with company matters (red votes) and all residents matters (yellow and red votes).

    Or you can do 1 and hold the all residents meeting in say September or October depending on the timing and nature of issues likely to be raised.
    In a routine budget you might do as I suggest earlier giving the information and suggestion invitee comments and have the meeting to finalise it or with say major works you might want a meeting first and take a sounding of ideas before you go to budget stage.
    In most cases a solid explanation of accounts budgets and proposals before hand makes such meetings far more effective.
    Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.


      RTM companies are usually set up by a majority of leaseholders in the block to legally take over the administration of the service charge account and perform some minor duties under the lease.

      After commencing, the RTM company will appoint a managing agent to manage the service charge account and collect the service charge contributions from every leaseholder .

      The Managing Agent appointed by the RTM , should work to the service charge standard given in the RICS Residential Management Code which includes arranging for audited annual accounts and providing access to see the expenses documents.

      The RTM should provide annual meeting to leaseholders who are required to pay all the expenses under the lease. If the service charge account administration is not satisfactory the RTM has to replace the managing agent by another one.


        Sorry for delay saying thanks. Our company ARD is the same as the lease year end (25 March) so to have one combined meeting to discuss the next year budget sits the company AGM before the ARD... but members are more interested in service charges etc anyway, than getting dormant accounts (though FRED 50 changes this next year far as I know).

        I guess a combined meeting in January to formally elect the directors and learn what happened in the company up to the previous March is no big issue before getting down to more interesting stuff like budgets and planning for next year. Our RTM formation 'agent' set the ARD not us.
        Do not read my offerings, based purely on my research or experience as a lessee, as legal advice. If you need legal advice please see a solicitor.


          Are you sure it is the 25th and not the 24th. If charges are due on quarter days ie 25th March, then the first charge of the new year is due in the last day of the old year. You can get round it by treating them as prepayments but be careful not to include them in the current yeas receivable income.

          Synchronising the RTM year end with the lease is the right thing to do.

          Having dormant accounts has always been wrong the RTM has the ultimate liability for all expenses (even if they are handled by an agent) and therefore cannot be dormant.

          That said delaying reporting actual expenses so late, as mentioned earlier, is wrong and they should be churned out within 3 months of the year end ie June so that they are current and ancient history by January. That can be done by letter breaking down the service charge accounts and if you wish making invoices available in a scanned form or via any number of free online cloud drivse e.g. one drive from outlook/MS or g drive from gmail.

          You can hold the AGM and deal with appointment of directors auditors remunerations and adoption of accounts, restrict voting as suggested, and then go onto look at the expenses to December, ¾ of the year, to forecast what the likely year position will be and discuss plans for expenses the following year with everyone.
          Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.


          Latest Activity


          • Freeholder Premium to consent
            by Limply
            Hi all,

            I am looking at extending my leasehold flat by adding a newbuild next to the loft (will be erected on top of the first floor). I have just asked my freeholder for the process to follow. In the past they have asked me to pay a "Landlord’s premium for the consent to be established
            11-08-2022, 16:20 PM
          • Reply to Freeholder Premium to consent
            by AndrewDod
            The simple answer is no you can't do what you think you can. At the very least you would probably need to pay the FH at least 50% of the uplift in value of your property. The "not cutting timbers stuff" is not relevant to building something outside of your demise.

            The FH might...
            11-08-2022, 20:12 PM
          • Reply to Freeholder Premium to consent
            by Limply
            Many thanks for the answer. I am already looking at buying the freehold title. Just need to convince the other leaseholder!...
            11-08-2022, 19:15 PM
          • Reply to Ground Rent review
            by Century
            Will post the wording of lease tomorrow - going sea swimming now 🤷‍♂️
            11-08-2022, 18:12 PM
          • Ground Rent review
            by Century
            United Scientific Holdings v Burnley Borough Council

            Does this case mean that for a residential lease failure to give notice of GR increase during the review period doesn't matter? I.e review can be at any time, even after specified review date?
            11-08-2022, 14:47 PM
          • Reply to Ground Rent review
            by Gordon999
            Residential property usually sold under 99 years or 125 years leases have ground rents which increases after every 33 years or 25 years as stated in the lease. The Burnley Council case does not seem to be under a 99 year or 125 year lease. ....
            11-08-2022, 17:30 PM
          • Reply to Freeholder Premium to consent
            by Gordon999
            Your lease is only a long term rental contract. You have no ownership in the building which belongs to the freeholder.

            If you want to add a loft extension above the first floor, you should consider purchasing the freehold title first.
            11-08-2022, 17:15 PM
          • Reply to Another leasehold nightmare!
            by Gordon999
            How many leasehold flats in your building ? North or South London ?

            Under the terms of the lease, the freeholder appoints a managing agent (MA) to administer the service charge account and MA collects the service charge contributions from the leaseholders.

            If you allow the...
            11-08-2022, 16:47 PM
          • Another leasehold nightmare!
            by porkmarkets
            Hi all! Long time lurker here. I've used this forum for advice and ideas since purchasing my leasehold flat a few years ago which has been super useful but unfortunately I have become stuck. So I've decided finally to sign up and beg you all for some advice specific advise.

            I bought my...
            20-07-2022, 20:53 PM
          • Reply to Ground Rent review
            by AndrewDod
            I have not read the judgment but no notice is required for a residential ground rent increase that is specified in the lease. The FH does however need to invoice every ground rent request in the prescribed form -- so to at least that extent notice is given of the rate of rent requested at that time...
            11-08-2022, 16:36 PM