TR1 - one transferor wants to add two new transferees (joint freehold)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    TR1 - one transferor wants to add two new transferees (joint freehold)

    Hi

    One house split into three flats. As it happens us three flat owners (leaseholders) are also the three named people on the freehold title. One flat owner is selling his flat, and consequently wants to transfer the title register from his name to the new buyer. But the new buyer is a couple and they are both noted on the TR1 form (different names - ie appear to be unmarried if it makes a difference).

    That looks to me like the freehold would therefore change from it's current state of having three names on it (of which I am one) to four names. Thus potentially meaning my level of influence / control / ownership would decrease to a quarter, whereas currently it is a third?! or am I reading it wrong? and perhaps it doesn't matter. I haven't signed it yet wanted to seek advice first.

    Where the new buyers are 'name C and D':

    In box 5 it says 'name A, name B, name C and D' so in that sense is name C and D (the new buyers) existing as one entity? (ie the 'and' is significant). Thus they still perhaps only count as one being?

    Or should I be insisting that I only want one new name to go on the form to replace the one name leaving the form? Also isn't it more problematic in future as it would mean finding all four people to sign future transfer of title's etc and what if they split up and one party becomes uncooperative / goes missing etc

    one other point if in the future we want to make changes that require all our agreement eg divding up the garden, would they have more 'say' than the other two freeholders individually ie they would have two votes ie there is now four 'votes' in total if you see what I mean. At the moment there is no company set up or agreement or anything I believe it is a 'Literal Shared Freehold' if that's how it's known.

    thanks

    #2
    Where it would be a pain is if you later decided to set up a declaration/deed of trust relating to the freehold. It would I believe make the wording a little more complex. I'm sure one of the legal eagles here will be able to advise. I would push for just 1 of their names to go on. After all 4 is the maximum and you would not be able to do the same in a subsequent sale.

    Comment


      #3
      It really depends whether you have any governing document which sets out the ownership and voting among you such as a declaration of trust.

      If it is a beneficial joint tenancy - where the 3 people are a single owner ie the owner is Mr A Mrs B and Miss C, then a 4th name, Ms D would simply alter that, and without any documentation, there would be 1 flat with 2 votes.

      If tenants in common- means the property is as above where the 3 people are a single owner, however a specific share of the value is allocated to them so that Mr C and Miss D as the new owners of flat 3 would be allocated 1/3rd and hopefully if your dealings are straightforward only one vote that they share, and hopefully not end up one of them sleeping on the couch when they disagree.


      As, assuming no documentation is available to the contrary, Mr C and Miss D canot buy and Miss c cannot sell 9 the freehold) without your signature and this is the ideal time to exchange letters setting out that you get one vote, or 1 each and each other flats gets a proportion bump, in this case 2 votes per flat for all flats, or d spot of lawyer bothering and have a proper trust deed drawn up.
      http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums...9t-Tell-You-P1
      Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

      Comment


        #4
        Huge thanks. I've done a lot of reading, (read, read, and err.. re-read everything including your linked to article!) By the way yes it is a beneficial joint tenancy. I have proposed to the other leaseholder and freeholder that we do two things (I think):
        1) trust deed set up
        2) extend our leases at the same time

        I will be seeing a properly solicitor who I've met with before about some other stuff to go through this. I understand your point that this is the ideal time to get these things put in place since the seller wants to sell, the buyers want to buy = they will be motivated at this point in time to get any changes we can agree on done.

        Comment


          #5
          Coolhands, the benefits of a deed of trust can easily be read up on inthis forum and on the net, but just be aware that in your sort of situation with only 3 flats a deed of trust can also have a 'dark side'. ie if you have a different point of view to the other 2 flats they could consistently outvote you, even if their ideas are terrible. This was certainly the case with me until I proved a purported deed null and void.

          Comment


            #6
            its a good point and in my waffling in the FAQs a key point in a trust deed or company articles is to include dispute resolution e.g. mediation or arbitration rather than having to resort to injunctions.
            Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

            Comment

            Latest Activity

            Collapse

            • Reply to Legal Action Against Landlord - Local Council
              by Section20z
              It may benefit older leases by removing "marriage value" from lease extensions but this would not help you _ and freeholders are also aware of imminent changes and may be more willing to negotiate prior.
              Speak with a specialist like Homehold.org who will negotiate on your behalf,...
              05-12-2021, 07:14 AM
            • Legal Action Against Landlord - Local Council
              by Isaac1400
              Hi,

              Hoping someone can advise. I am leaseholder and the landlord is a local council. my property is a flat and there are about 55 flats spread out over 3 floors.

              Now the problem is that over the years the council has failed to maintain the exterior and communal areas - including...
              02-12-2021, 07:13 AM
            • How much can the freeholder charge for registering details of a sublet?
              by Joubert
              I am a director of a Freehold Company of a small block of 28 flats in a popular residential area.

              Over the past few years the majority of flats have been purchased by investors who sublet the flats on ASTs.

              Although the leases between the Freehold Company and the lessees are...
              04-12-2021, 17:35 PM
            • Reply to How much can the freeholder charge for registering details of a sublet?
              by eagle2
              If the lease states that you may charge a registration fee of £10, that is the amount you may charge, you are not entitled to increase the charge unless the lease specifically allows an increase. Even then you would be limited to a reasonable amount and £100 would be considered to be unreasonable....
              05-12-2021, 06:55 AM
            • Reply to Legal Action Against Landlord - Local Council
              by andydd
              I sued my freeholder for failure to maintain my driveway, judge was quite damning but I was only awarded £100 as hard to proof any loss BUT in your case it sounds you have exceptional worry over various incidents so yes you could sue and as I found out it was useful, I got costs too and its something...
              04-12-2021, 21:19 PM
            • Dilapidated Flat
              by scot22
              In a block of 24, unfortunately one flat has become dilapidated. The new owner has bought cheaply. She is now demanding the Freeholder pays to refurbish it claiming they have been negligent. Is there a reasonable case ?
              04-12-2021, 11:21 AM
            • Reply to Dilapidated Flat
              by scot22
              Thanks all. It was a great price, significantly below market value, plus in further negotiations a reduction to pay for any further work. This was identified by a surveyor. She is not clueless.....
              Artful in my research I read that can only claim for her ownership period.
              It is all i...
              04-12-2021, 19:33 PM
            • Reply to Legal Action Against Landlord - Local Council
              by Isaac1400
              Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I have heard of this. In summary do you know if this would benefit those with older leases and not on the builds which have has issues with rising ground rent etc?...
              04-12-2021, 19:09 PM
            • Reply to Dilapidated Flat
              by Macromia
              If a leaseholder can show that internal maintenance is required because of a freeholder's negligence (e.g. a failure to meet external maintenance obligations according to the terms of the lease), they will potentially have a claim against the freeholder and be entitled to expect the freeholder (the...
              04-12-2021, 16:59 PM
            • Reply to Dilapidated Flat
              by theartfullodger
              The previous owner might have had a case. The new owner I think only for claims for problems during their ownership. But ianal.

              Presumably she got a great price as it was so dilapidated
              04-12-2021, 16:51 PM
            Working...
            X