Freehold flat, 70 year lease = marriage value?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    If all freeholders agree to grant each other the same length of lease extension then they are all granting each other something of equal value and no premium is payable to any party. Don't assume all will be willing to extend with you though even though it appears to be in their own best interests to do it with you. It may be that one or more can not afford to and/or one or more is very old, does not envisage moving other than in a wooden box and just wants to collect one third of the premium to spend on whatever in their old age. If you do get your lease extension on this basis then in the future you may be able to collect one third of the premium any of the others have to pay when they extend their leases. That's assuming the articles of the freehold company allow for this. If property prices are higher then than now then that premium will be calculated on a higher marriage value.

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by trunkie View Post
      So provided that the 3 current freeholders (the vendor and the other 2 flats) agree that we can extend our individual lease for £1 then everything is good and no marriage value will come into play?
      Yes but on taking advice they will find that they are sitting on a pot of money and any offer made with drawn. The section 42 application alone will indicate a figure.

      They would be daft to do otherwise, unless when they bought the freehold they made agreements to grant lease extensions for free or £1. Sadly not all freeholders get that advice, many believing in that mythical tenure, share of freehold.
      Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

      Comment


        #18
        Thanks for the replies so far, I really appreciate the advice. I suggested to the vendor that all 3 flats renew at the same time. The EA has just forwarded me her response:

        I just have received emails from both flat A and Flat C confirming that they both would like to renew the lease at the same time.
        Unfortunately flat A has been in hospital and Flat C is abroad for the next 7 weeks, so the timing to renew before we exchange is not feasible, however they are both keen to renew and all at the same time.
        As trunkie states if all flats renewed simultaneously there would be no premium, only legal costs. I asked my solicitor for a ballpark figure and he quoted £700 inc VAT to renew all three leases, which means the cost of a 999 year would come out at around £233 per flat!
        So in principal this all sounds great. The thing that worries me is the 7 weeks absence of lessee C as she won't be able to sign the agreement until her return. Presumably this could all fall apart on her return, by which time the vendor will be long gone. Are we best to request the vendor takes responsibility for the 3 extensions with her solicitor and we pay her fees?

        Comment


          #19
          trunkie,

          What I said in my first post still stands:

          I would say get the vendor to extend the lease to a length agreeable to you and your partner before you buy. That way it is up to her to arrange to have the lease extended with the agreement of the other freeholders and for her to pay the premium (if any) and the legal costs to do so.

          This way the marriage value and any problems associated with all the parties being in agreement is not your concern.
          What the vendor is saying is she is not prepared to wait for the leases being extended and if you want to buy you will have to buy as is. This is a red flag to me. I would insist that she extends the lease to 999 years if that's what you want and have her pay her share of the legal fees. There is no guarantee that once you buy the other parties will still be in agreement if they are now, you only have the vendors word for it. A multitude of things can happen between buying and then extending the leases, not limited too but including freeholder partner bereavement, death, divorce, mental incapacity and imprisonment etc. What happens if your other freeholder goes back into hospital, and you don't know what for, and your abroad freeholder returns abroad at the same time? At this point you don't know if there is any problem with the way the freehold is set up, lawyers are not immune to making mistakes.

          I would walk away if the vendor is not prepared to do what I suggest in the third sentence in the paragraph above. Why are you spending so much time wanting to buy a flat with a relatively low lease anyway. Buy one with a long lease and you will save all this bother.

          Comment


            #20
            Just to clarify my comment above, the vendor to pay her share of the leaseholders legal fees for extending the leases i.e. the one third of the £700 mentioned above. You should only be paying for YOUR conveyancing costs.

            I don't know what is the matter with this forum but when I try to edit my posts I am presented with a blank dialogue box! Anyone else experiencing the same?

            Comment


              #21
              In which case the price has to be adjusted to reflect the current term. Many sales prices fail to reflect that. The vendor will find themselves in a similar situation in a few weeks if they re offer.
              Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

              Comment


                #22
                Originally posted by Free Holder View Post
                Why are you spending so much time wanting to buy a flat with a relatively low lease anyway. Buy one with a long lease and you will save all this bother.
                I'm guessing you've not been a first time buyer in zone 2 in London recently!

                Comment


                  #23
                  My turn to do some guessing. Don't let the fear of losing out on what appears to be a housing bull market on what prima facie might seem like a good deal without acting diligently on your due diligence. As a property investor and financial trader/investor I know from my own experiences and that of others that people are at there weakest when allowing the emotions of fear and/or greed to cloud their judgement. If I had property in London I would be more inclined to sell than to buy while the going is good, but that's a macroeconomic issue and not for discussion here.

                  Comment

                  Latest Activity

                  Collapse

                  • License to Alter required to carry out repairs?
                    by APK
                    Hi all,

                    Looking for some advice. My wife and I recently bought a leasehold property in London. The property came with wooden flooring, and the lease specified no wooden flooring could be installed without consent.

                    The lease states, with regards to the flooring issue:
                    "Not
                    ...
                    30-07-2021, 14:41 PM
                  • Reply to License to Alter required to carry out repairs?
                    by Lawcruncher
                    I was thinking rather on the same lines which is why I asked the OP if he and his wife had signed the indemnity, hoping they had not so I did not have to consider the effect of the document. I have now considered it and concluded that it probably does not override the lease. However, there is still...
                    01-08-2021, 18:37 PM
                  • Accounting for RMC
                    by SHill
                    Would anyone be able to advise if a RMC can raise sales invoices to Directors, for property expenses that relate to their leasehold properties. The sales invoices raise are itemised in the Notes to the service charges at. 4. Transactions with Directors and 5. Related party transactions
                    09-02-2021, 22:41 PM
                  • Reply to Accounting for RMC
                    by SHill
                    I agree with Eagle 2 - As Director I am complying with the Companies Act 2006 to act in the best interests of the Company....
                    01-08-2021, 14:41 PM
                  • Section 20 notice / repairing obligation
                    by Grah8m
                    REPAIRING OBLIGATION / SECTION 20 NOTICE
                    Our residential long lease does not impose Landlord Repairing Obligations - rather underlease provides procedures enabling any one of convenantees (5 x underlessees - 1 x "Landlord"/Underlessor) may initiate repairing maintenance works and...
                    01-08-2021, 13:59 PM
                  • Reply to Accounting for RMC
                    by eagle2
                    If you were filing a false document, I would agree, however, you are not and there is a greater risk of being personally responsible for the ongoing penalties which are being incurred. You are acting consistently with your claim that the previous officers of the Company could and should have filed statutory...
                    01-08-2021, 09:49 AM
                  • Reply to Accounting for RMC
                    by Section20z
                    I'd be very wary of filing a false financial instrument particularly with the revelations about the other parties...
                    01-08-2021, 08:35 AM
                  • Reply to License to Alter required to carry out repairs?
                    by Macromia
                    It doesn't sound to me that this is an issue with what is/isn't demised.
                    It sounds like the floor covering is within the demise, but the floor covering present at the time of purchase was one that the lease does not allow without the freeholder's consent.

                    The indemnity that was signed...
                    01-08-2021, 07:52 AM
                  • Reply to Accounting for RMC
                    by SHill
                    [QUOTE=eagle2;n1164773]I I can send you a PDF by private message if you wish..

                    Thank you that would be useful....
                    31-07-2021, 20:37 PM
                  • Reply to License to Alter required to carry out repairs?
                    by ram
                    Your lease should state what is included in your demise, therefore responsible to maintain / fix .
                    It usually states, you are demised
                    the floor boards, internal plaster over the bricks, and either half the floor joists, and half the ceiling joists. If it does not include mention of the joists,
                    ...
                    31-07-2021, 13:37 PM
                  Working...
                  X