to be used as private residential flats and for no other purpose

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    to be used as private residential flats and for no other purpose

    Can someone help define what this means. Is this a restrictive user clause or could i still rent out a flat if the above clause was in the lease. Also does it restrict who the flat could be let to or rather to how many people. Does this clause prevent you from turning the flat into an hmo?

    #2
    To me it would mean not commercial i.e not used for business purposes.
    "I'm afraid I didn't do enough background checks apart from checking her identity on Facebook" - ANON

    What I say is based on my own experience and research - Please don't take as gospel without first checking the gospel yourself.

    Comment


      #3
      An HMO is a business.

      Comment


        #4
        Yes, but the use of the flat is still residential and not commercial (ie. it's not an office or a shop).

        I don't think such clause prevents letting. Many houses also have such covenant in their freehold titles.

        Comment


          #5
          Seems to be clearly stated. It's for private use only. Not business. Not tenanted out. Private use. You own it, you live there.
          I may be a housing professional but my views, thoughts, opinions, advice, criticisms or otherwise on this board are mine and are not representative of my company, colleagues, managers. I am here as an independent human being who simply wants to learn new stuff, share ideas and interact with like minded people.

          Comment


            #6
            Can't agree here - If rented out to a single family it is still a private residence. If the clause was meant to say what you imply it would say "private use for the occupation of the owner and their family only" or something similar. I would argue that even if using as an HMO it is still a private residence but I accept that this is a grey area that you could argue either way.

            Comment


              #7
              As said, such clauses are common so I don't think there is much grey area. The key is to ask someone who is knowledgeable about this topic, e.g. a conveyancing solicitor.

              In fact, if one googles the wording of that clause a tribunal decision shows up, in which the tribunal ruled that even holiday letting was fine:
              http://www.residential-property.judi...e/40004MV8.htm

              Comment


                #8
                That Tribunal case was decided on the fact that sub-letting was not prohibited by Lease at the material time.

                Every case is different and as the Tribunal states, they are not bound by any other Tribunal decisions. Still a good explanation of what the Clause means

                Comment


                  #9
                  Well the question was whether the clause prevented sub-letting, so it is assumed that there is no specific such prohibition somewhere else in the lease.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by ram View Post
                    An HMO is a business.
                    But so is a BTL....the use is at issue not who or what is "using" as a private residential flat.
                    Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by jjlandlord View Post
                      In fact, if one googles the wording of that clause a tribunal decision shows up, in which the tribunal ruled that even holiday letting was fine:
                      http://www.residential-property.judi...e/40004MV8.htm
                      Be careful, I was advised that the case referenced was later challenged in other cases and now deemed to be incorrect.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        I see that this has been discussed before here > http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums...p/t-26387.html with the general conclusion that letting is allowed, I couldnt find any mention of the Maymo case being appealed to the UT/Higher Court though.
                        Advice given is based on my experience representing myself as a leaseholder both in the County Court and at Leasehold Valuation Tribunals.

                        I do not accept any liability to you in relation to the advice given.

                        It is always recommended you seek further advice from a solicitor or legal expert.

                        Always read your lease first, it is the legally binding contract between leaseholder and freeholder.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          It is a user clause. We have to ask what the people in the building are using it for. Are they using it a way which could be considered not private? Are they using it for other than a residential purpose? Are they using it in such a way that a reasonable person would say that the separate parts are not flats? If the answer in each case is "no" then there is no breach of the clause.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Private residential flat should mean private for one family living in the flat. HMO is a situation where 2 or more families live in the same property and share the bathroom and kitchen so that is NOT private.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Surely if the intention of the lease is to restrict letting or HMO use then the lease will include clauses about-

                              a) single family use
                              b) restricting subletting
                              c) not subletting part as distinct from the whole

                              I personally wouldn't read that clause as a restriction on any kind of residential use in isolation.

                              Maybe the OP can advise if there are other relevant clauses

                              Comment

                              Latest Activity

                              Collapse

                              • Reply to AGM cancelled.
                                by Grumio
                                The articles state they must declare any kind of interest directly or indirectly, problem is it’s kind of hard to deal with people who keep messing everyone around, calling an AGM and then cancelling it for eg. We have called meetings with them in the past and they don’t turn up. How can you deal...
                                26-01-2022, 14:35 PM
                              • AGM cancelled.
                                by Grumio
                                Is this legal?

                                A bit of background, we currently have three directors, we are allowed to have up to a maximum of eight directors according to the articles of association. We are all leaseholders. Last summer the three directors decided to hire a managing agent who is now in charge of the...
                                26-01-2022, 00:46 AM
                              • Reply to AGM cancelled.
                                by eagle2
                                Any meeting which you decide to hold will be an informal meeting only, you do need to follow the correct procedure if you wish to hold a valid meeting,

                                The Articles should state whether or not directors need to declare conflicts of interest and whether or not they are entitled to vote on...
                                26-01-2022, 13:30 PM
                              • Reply to AGM cancelled.
                                by Grumio
                                It is both a managing agent and a residence Association. But we want to go back to managing the block ourselves.

                                Thanks for the reply, yes invitations have been sent to all our members. And I agree, they should not cancel the AGM, especially when they haven’t got a plausible reason to...
                                26-01-2022, 12:12 PM
                              • Reply to Lease extension triggers doubling ground rent change
                                by sgclacy
                                Doubling every 25 years is simply a guess as to what inflation may be, if inflation of the current levels ( about 6% ) was to continue the real value of the rent would fall by 77% and doubling would not address the enormous damage done by inflation. However, if inflation was less than 2.81% per annum...
                                26-01-2022, 11:57 AM
                              • Reply to Lease extension triggers doubling ground rent change
                                by Section20z
                                You are clearly using the informal route and can thus negotiate whatever terms you like.
                                freeholder will want to retain some ground rent but avoid the doubling clause, maybe suggest small fixed rises every ten years....
                                26-01-2022, 10:40 AM
                              • Service charges according to floorspace vs lease stipulation
                                by Santa Fe
                                Hello. I own a flat in a block of four. The new owner of the smallest flat is disputing their contribution to service charges based on floor size. All four flats have historically paid 25% each, but of the four leases only mine states that I pay 25%. I have spoken with a solicitor about this and he...
                                24-01-2022, 22:55 PM
                              • Reply to Service charges according to floorspace vs lease stipulation
                                by Section20z
                                Quite, there is also the question here of who the actual freeholder is and whether the whole thing is any concern of the OP who only ever need pay 25% !!...
                                26-01-2022, 10:25 AM
                              • Reply to AGM cancelled.
                                by eagle2
                                Yes, I am confused too. If there is a Residents Association, it is required to comply with its constitution.

                                There seems to be a Company involved as well. Whether or not it is required to hold an AGM depends on its Articles, AGMs can be cancelled for various reasons, lockdowns are an example,...
                                26-01-2022, 10:19 AM
                              • Reply to Service charges according to floorspace vs lease stipulation
                                by eagle2
                                I think that we have found 3 possible alternatives already and no doubt we could find more, As Section20z says it is very rare for a court or a tribunal to intervene, The lease appears to allow the freeholder (?) to decide what is fair and reasonable and it has decided that an equal share is reasonable,...
                                26-01-2022, 10:01 AM
                              Working...
                              X