Hypothetical Scenario #1

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Hypothetical Scenario #1

    OK folks, I am still trying to get my head around lease forfeiture, so I have created a hypothetical scenario as a test.

    Imagine a situation where:-

    1) a COMMERCIAL lease is granted to Company X.
    2) Company X restructures itself into Company Y.
    3) Company Y is taken over by Company Z.
    4) the lease-granting landlord decides to sell the freehold and informs the incoming landlord that he has never collected any ground rent for that lease, even though it was granted several years ago.
    5) the Land Registry's records still show long defunct Company X's name on the lease.
    6) the lease is a standard commercial lease with a clause to the effect that if the rent remains unpaid for 21 days, whether it is demanded or not, the LL can re-enter the premises.

    Question: If the new landlord wants to forfeit that lease, what is the easiest option for him?

    Does he have to go through the palaver of peaceable re-entry, or can he just ask the Land Registry to remove the lease as the company in question no longer exists?

    Additionally, since Company X no longer exists, is the new LL still bound to notify anyone of his purchase of the freehold?


    #2
    In case I didn't make it clear - the new LL's aim is to sell Company Z a new lease.

    Comment


      #3
      What exactly do you mean by restructures it self in the context of company !!!!!

      Comment


        #4
        You need to consult a commercial property solicitor about this situation.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Gordon999 View Post
          You need to consult a commercial property solicitor about this situation.
          This is a hypothetical scenario, remember?

          Comment


            #6
            Restructuring into company y is likely an assignment.

            If its hypothetical ,given the other posts, & despite you being around for some time, are you a student looking for answers?
            Or someone in business looking for free advice?

            I don't necessarily have an objection, it's just nice to have a bit of honesty.
            Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

            Comment


              #7
              I'm a bit of both, really. I'm a BTL landlord who is thinking about buying some ground rent investments and wondering whether it's worth it or not. As you will appreciate, it's a totally different ball game and in some respects it's quite scary, so I am trying to learn as much as I can before taking the plunge. In fact, I may even decide not to do it at all, but either way I want to make an informed decision. Is that honest enough for you?

              Back to my original enquiry. If restructuring into a company is an assignment and the lease still bears the pre-incorporation entity's name (also bearing in mind that nobody's paid any rent for donkey's years as well) then wouldn't the new LL be allowed to get the Land Registry to remove the lease and offer a new one to the corporation that is using the property?

              At the end of the day, an unincorporated entity is not the same as corporation it may subsequently create. When I sold my flat to my company my company had to pay stamp duty, just as any other buyer would have done. So why should it be any different for these guys?

              Comment


                #8
                Assignment of Lease - Definition

                Transfer by the original tenant (the assignor) of his or her rights to a sub-tenant (the assignee) to use the leased property. However, the assignor remains liable under the original lease contract unless expressly released by the landlord.

                http://www.businessdictionary.com/de...-of-lease.html
                It cannot be an assignment then. Otherwise the corporation would be the sub-tenant of a defunct legal entity.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Perplexed View Post
                  It cannot be an assignment then. Otherwise the corporation would be the sub-tenant of a defunct legal entity.
                  So you trust a dictionary rather than a qualified practitioner of some 28 years post degree experience.....ok.
                  Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Perplexed View Post
                    Is that honest enough for you?

                    ?
                    Thank you its better to understand where a person is coming from, and when you spend time thinking about an issue that its not someone abusing us members to answer exam questions

                    If a company simply recapitalises and changes it name, and does not truly becomes a new company then the original lease and liability stands.

                    Don't forget that even if they created a new company Y, that the orignal lease is assigned from x to y they are simply the successors in title to x. Even though x is still named in the lease, Y is recognised, though the parties should have a licence to do so, and HMLR should have been notified.

                    I suspect company y is still company x, check its history at CH. If it is new company then its a matter of as landlord registering the assignment at HMLR, and bill rent for 6 years or if they say not us then tell the to get the F out- they cant have it both ways. LOL
                    Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by leaseholdanswers View Post
                      Don't forget that even if they created a new company Y, that the orignal lease is assigned from x to y they are simply the successors in title to x. Even though x is still named in the lease, Y is recognised, though the parties should have a licence to do so, and HMLR should have been notified.

                      I suspect company y is still company x, check its history at CH. If it is new company then its a matter of as landlord registering the assignment at HMLR, and bill rent for 6 years or if they say not us then tell the to get the F out- they cant have it both ways. LOL
                      Yes, at the very least the new LL should be able to recover some rent arrears, and if lucky even the property itself.

                      Thank you for your answer.

                      Comment

                      Latest Activity

                      Collapse

                      • AGM cancelled.
                        by Grumio
                        Is this legal?

                        A bit of background, we currently have three directors, we are allowed to have up to a maximum of eight directors according to the articles of association. We are all leaseholders. Last summer the three directors decided to hire a managing agent who is now in charge of the...
                        26-01-2022, 00:46 AM
                      • Reply to AGM cancelled.
                        by eagle2
                        Any meeting which you decide to hold will be an informal meeting only, you do need to follow the correct procedure if you wish to hold a valid meeting,

                        The Articles should state whether or not directors need to declare conflicts of interest and whether or not they are entitled to vote on...
                        26-01-2022, 13:30 PM
                      • Reply to AGM cancelled.
                        by Grumio
                        It is both a managing agent and a residence Association. But we want to go back to managing the block ourselves.

                        Thanks for the reply, yes invitations have been sent to all our members. And I agree, they should not cancel the AGM, especially when they haven’t got a plausible reason to...
                        26-01-2022, 12:12 PM
                      • Reply to Lease extension triggers doubling ground rent change
                        by sgclacy
                        Doubling every 25 years is simply a guess as to what inflation may be, if inflation of the current levels ( about 6% ) was to continue the real value of the rent would fall by 77% and doubling would not address the enormous damage done by inflation. However, if inflation was less than 2.81% per annum...
                        26-01-2022, 11:57 AM
                      • Reply to Lease extension triggers doubling ground rent change
                        by Section20z
                        You are clearly using the informal route and can thus negotiate whatever terms you like.
                        freeholder will want to retain some ground rent but avoid the doubling clause, maybe suggest small fixed rises every ten years....
                        26-01-2022, 10:40 AM
                      • Reply to Service charges according to floorspace vs lease stipulation
                        by Section20z
                        Quite, there is also the question here of who the actual freeholder is and whether the whole thing is any concern of the OP who only ever need pay 25% !!...
                        26-01-2022, 10:25 AM
                      • Service charges according to floorspace vs lease stipulation
                        by Santa Fe
                        Hello. I own a flat in a block of four. The new owner of the smallest flat is disputing their contribution to service charges based on floor size. All four flats have historically paid 25% each, but of the four leases only mine states that I pay 25%. I have spoken with a solicitor about this and he...
                        24-01-2022, 22:55 PM
                      • Reply to AGM cancelled.
                        by eagle2
                        Yes, I am confused too. If there is a Residents Association, it is required to comply with its constitution.

                        There seems to be a Company involved as well. Whether or not it is required to hold an AGM depends on its Articles, AGMs can be cancelled for various reasons, lockdowns are an example,...
                        26-01-2022, 10:19 AM
                      • Reply to Service charges according to floorspace vs lease stipulation
                        by eagle2
                        I think that we have found 3 possible alternatives already and no doubt we could find more, As Section20z says it is very rare for a court or a tribunal to intervene, The lease appears to allow the freeholder (?) to decide what is fair and reasonable and it has decided that an equal share is reasonable,...
                        26-01-2022, 10:01 AM
                      • Reply to AGM cancelled.
                        by fos333
                        Is this a Residence Association or Residents Management Company?

                        Had invitations to the AGM been sent out to all members? If invitations had been issued then no the AGM should not have been cancelled.

                        If the 2 directors are "good friends of the managing agent" they...
                        26-01-2022, 10:00 AM
                      Working...
                      X