Lease extension

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Galatea
    replied
    Good point: well not all leases are the same value: If say No 1 flat is indexed at £100, mine No 2 is £75 and no 3 is £56. The sizes of flats are different and the private garden area/land owned is different.
    i will look into that.

    Leave a comment:


  • sgclacy
    replied
    Further to my posting I would make teh following comment

    The directors are not automatically in breach of trust by granting a lease extentsion at nil cost, PROVIDED all leases are originally of the same value and are extended at the same price. If they do not do this then they are distributing value to themselves which aside from the legal aspects would of course create a tax implication form them. If you do what I suggest you will be saving them from some serious problems and at the same time getting what you want. The cost of doing the deed of surrender and re-grant should be around £400 plus VAT rising to around £550 plus VAT if you have a mortgagee.

    They would be very foolish indeed to accuse you of nay foul play if you grant your lease on teh same terms as they have done

    Leave a comment:


  • Galatea
    replied
    sgclacy,

    Thank you I did not know there are solutions, though the important is the cost and time.
    I will look into your suggestion and it is helpful. I need first to get the DoV prepared.
    I will update.

    Leave a comment:


  • Galatea
    replied
    Thanks leasehold

    It makes a difference to think there is solution but the cost is the important variable to know. I will look into this and will instruct my conveyacing solicitor to prepare a DoV for my lease to present to my directors. My question to you is: if I do not get my DoV signed what kind solicitor do I have to hav? any? or somebody in company Law - in which case I would not be able to afford. Or can I go ahead by myself to take court action if my DoV is not signed?
    can you PM me a recommended Solicitor who has experience of such cases?

    Leave a comment:


  • Moderator2
    replied
    Two related threads have been merged.

    Leave a comment:


  • westminster
    replied
    I would recommend you get legal advice. If you send me a PM I can suggest someone.

    Leave a comment:


  • sgclacy
    replied
    As a director why can't you execute the deed of surrender and regramt and grant a lease ext to yourself in the same terms as which the others have done for themselves. One director can execute such a deed and need only have his signature witnessed by an independent person

    The other directors can hardly complain as they are skating on very thin ice because if they seek a premium from you when you want a lease ext yet did not levy a premium on their own they could open themselves up to a number of serious allegations

    Do get a copy from the land registey of their deeds of surrender and regramt to ensure yours is granted in the same terms

    Leave a comment:


  • leaseholdanswers
    replied
    There are remedies and its a relativley simple court proceeding for the court to force a new lease to be issued on the same basis as an equitable remedy in simple terms that given the situation you all be treated the same.

    I would look and see if a new lease was granted or it was a simple deed of variation and present whichever in the same form, as a fait accomplait to the directors, sign it or I sue.

    Then when that is acheived, you apply for the appointment of an independant manager appinted by the LVT to remove powers from the company, but keep that quiet until your lease is extended your mortgagee has consented and its regisetered at HMLR.

    Leave a comment:


  • Galatea
    replied
    Originally posted by bandontherun
    there might be. Is the freehold owned by a limited company with you each having a third share or just by the three flat owners collectively. this is an appalling story and underlines the merit of having an external freeholder who is impartial as between differing lessees. If it is a limited company and your two co-shareholders have behaved inequitably toward you (as would certainly appear to have been the case) there may be a remedy under the companies act.
    Thanks. The freehold is owned by a limited company and Each owner has one third share. I agree there is a merit having a external landlord. We had originally a freeholder who was impartial. He sold the freehold to us. All the problems arose when we bought the freehold. The state of repairs declined. The second lesson in my case is there is a risk in buying a property with shared freehold which has overdue repairs. We have no service charge and when I proposed one this was contested by the other 2 lessees. So we have a disrepair which causes difficulty in selling.

    Company Law provides remedies for unfair treatment of shareholders but the costs of Lawyers can be very higher that he costs of pursuing extension via LRHA 93.

    Probably I may find cash buyers who would offer me a reduce market value near to market minus deducting the costs of extension.

    I do not know if it would work like this: try to find a cash buyer and before the exchange I apply to have the lease extended and sell my flat with the benefit of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Galatea
    replied
    Lease extension

    I have 1/3 share of freehold in a block with 3 flats 1, 2 which is mine and flat 3. The freeholder is a manco made up of owners of each of the 3 flat. Each owner is a director. Majority of 2 directors is required to reach a decision. The leases were until March this year running 64 years for each the 3 flats. The other 2 directors extended their lease last March to free to 999 y using the majority of themselves without need to have my signature. They left me withonly 64 years. Some people find delight in doing so. This type of freehold leaves the third director/owner that is open to abuse by the other 2 and it might cause ganging up of the other two and potentially leads to poor management and bad state of repairs and poor relations between freeholders. All is interrelated in a vicious circle.

    I have approached the past 3 years svera times, written and spoken to flat 1 to extend our leases all 3 flats together at low cost and I said I would sign their leases if they sign mine. Flat 3 is hostile and had a police caution due to an assault against me in the stairs so I stayed away from them. The response of flat 1 was “flats 1 and 3 would refused to grant me or sign an extension of my lease buthey would only grant 999 y between themselves” I asked flats 1 and 3 to provide me with details of their solicitor if they had instructed one but they did not respond. I was kept in the dark. Flats 1 and 3 sabotaged my sales in the past 3 years by saying to my buyers who approached them that they would not sign my lease extension and they the buyers had to buy first the flats and next after 2 years pay flats 1 and 3 a premium to get the lease extended. Needless to say my buyers found them unreasonable and quit my sale moreover because they could not get a mortgage. The building has fallen in disrepair, flat 3 cannot afford any repair cost but flat 1 paid part of her costs to have the support of her vote against me. We never had an AGM because matters were decided between flats 1 and 3 and I was left

    I got a letter 3 months ago from flat 1 saying she and flat 3 had instructed a joint solicitor, to extend their leases but gave no contact of him/her. They did not even ask me to join in. I felt pointless doing anything because they denied to sign my extension whenever I discusse it. They did extend their leases 2 weeks after that letter - 3 months ago - granting themselves 999 y leaving me with 64 y but I had no idea they did so until today. They did not call a GM and did not even inform me of the extension. They kept me in the dark and so I instructed my surveyor to prepare a valuation for my lease extension so that I used LRHA 1993. He found out the other 2 flats granted themselves extension 3 months ago. There is nothing I can do now except pay a fat premiumto the other 2 directors.

    There have been ongoing problems with flats 1 and 3. Now Flat 1 is on the market since 2 months but cannot sell and has no viewrs. I spoke to their agent who was put under misleading impression by the owner of flat 1 that I had no interest in extending my lease. I said that quite the opposite was true. He then said that this refusal shows disputes and can affect the sales of my co-directors and not only my own as it shows an ongoing dispute

    I wonder if there is any other solution than applying under LRHA 1993 to get my lease extended

    Leave a comment:


  • Galatea
    replied
    Thanks, exactly. It would not make sense of me signing someone else’s lease extension when they refuse to sign mine.

    Leave a comment:


  • JK0
    replied
    If neighbour tries to extend by herself, I would just bluster until she loses her buyer. Then she might see the wisdom of collective action.

    Leave a comment:


  • Galatea
    replied
    Thanks for the reply and the link. It is now clear when the 999 years are granted. The lessee however, says she does not want the 3 flats to come together and share in the legal costs; she says and that each flat must do extension by themselves. I asked her to clarify in writing what she would like to do.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gordon999
    replied
    The free guide to statutory lease extension and valuation method method may be downloaded from Lease website :

    http://www.lease-advice.org/publicat...nt.asp?item=10

    All 3 flats leases need to be extended by "statutory 90 years extension" before the flats are offered up for sale since most buyers require mortgage facility. There is no statutory right for leaseholders to seek a new 999 years lease.

    If the leases are extended separately, each must pay the cost of lease extension to the Freehold company. The free guide shows an example of flat with 68 years lease valued at 150K and cost payable for extension is roughly 10,700 but ontop there may be a further 300o-4000 to pay for surveyor fees and legal fees. The freehold company will pay tax at 20% on the fee received and balance can be distributed back to the 3 shareholders who may be required to pay extra income tax (if paying at 40% tax rate ).

    However if all 3 flat owners agree to pay and share the legal costs, the "freehold company" can issue new 999 years leases to each leaseholder at NIL premium. So the freehold company has no income and no tax to pay and all of you will save on legal costs , surveyor fees and tax.

    Leave a comment:

Latest Activity

Collapse

  • Lord Best report
    michelle230
    For anyone interested -

    Chapter 6 focus on Leasehold..

    https://www.gov.uk/government/public...g-group-report
    18-07-2019, 12:46 PM
  • Reply to Lord Best report
    eagle2
    ARMA estimate that £1.3 billion of unprotected client money is held by managing agents. So what is proposed? It is suggested that the Government considers making sinking funds mandatory in both existing and new leases, which is likely to add to the figure.

    It is also suggested that the...
    21-07-2019, 12:12 PM
  • Reply to Lord Best report
    eagle2
    This has fudge written all over it.

    Suppose that all agents declare an average 5% commission, I can imagine the Government and the new regulator claiming then that they have successfully reduced the rates of commission and acted in the best interests of all leaseholders, even though they...
    21-07-2019, 11:47 AM
  • Reply to Lord Best report
    eagle2
    The new regulator is supposed to be self financing, at least after the start up period, which probably means that the leaseholders will pay for the cost one way or another....
    21-07-2019, 11:29 AM
  • Reply to Lord Best report
    leaseholder64
    Carrying out spot checks would require an increase in tax payer spend. No Conservative government is going to sanction that.

    (As I said elsewhere, I think the country has reached a point where respect for the law is in terminal decline, as a result of not funding pro-active enforcement,...
    21-07-2019, 11:13 AM
  • Reply to Lord Best report
    eagle2
    I accept that transparency is better than nothing but can anyone explain how it assists a leaseholder if an agent declares that he receives say 5% commission on an insurance policy? A leaseholder is unlikely to be able to prove that the disclosure is incorrect. To have any meaning at all, someone should...
    21-07-2019, 11:04 AM
  • does solicitor no longer work for you after completion?
    TruthLedger
    Hello guys

    After asking a question today to my solicitor, I received this response below

    Our instructions are now concluded in respect of the conveyancing and there is no further correspondence for us to forward to you apart from the completed HMLR registration which will be...
    19-07-2019, 13:00 PM
  • Reply to does solicitor no longer work for you after completion?
    eagle2
    I suspect that this is connected with your comments on one of your other threads regarding the service charge deficit.

    Your solicitor appears to be saying that he has collected the service charge deficit from the vendor on this occasion but if the freeholder raises any further charges which...
    21-07-2019, 07:21 AM
  • Secret commissions
    Stacker
    The issue of freeholders and managing agents fiddling insurance commissions at leaseholders’ expense was raised in the Times earlier this month.

    Sir Peter, 74, said that secret commissions were part of a broader pattern of mistreatment of leaseholders. “Those receiving cowboy commissions...
    18-07-2019, 20:27 PM
  • Reply to Secret commissions
    eagle2
    Transparency and accountability is only part of the issue. Proving that all commissions have been declared is another matter. Proving that 3rd parties are connected with the freeholders and agents is another matter.

    Insurance only scratches the surface, what about all the other expenditure...
    21-07-2019, 06:03 AM
Working...
X