Jointly buying freehold

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jointly buying freehold

    Hello all,

    I need some advice please.

    I own a flat in a converted building on a leasehold basis. I extended my lease last year by purchasing the additional statutory 90 years, so my lease now is for 162 years remaining.

    The other 4 flat owners are also leaseholders. One of the 4 extended their lease a couple of years ago and the other 3 have something like 72 years remaining on their lease.

    I am very seriously thinking of contacting all my fellow leaseholders (as a joint email) to propose that we jointly buy the freehold of the building. The freehold is currently owned by an individual - none of us has any issues with him, he is a very nice man, the building is well maintained and the service charges are very reasonable. The reason why I am interested in buying the freehold together with my neighbours is because I think it would add value to our flats and I would be able to have my say on what's going on in the building (such as repairs, maintenance etc).

    Please can someone explain how this works? I am aware about setting up a limited company to hold the freehold and into which each leaseholder would have a share in the capital and own a lease for 999 years from that company, however, what I would like to know is the following:-

    1. How should I approach the 3 leaseholders who have not extended their lease yet and convince them to buy the freehold rather than extend their lease?

    2. How should I approach the leaseholder who extended his lease 2 years ago to convince him to buy a share of the freehold?

    3. My flat and the flat with an extended lease now have some 162 years remaining on the lease. Would our share in the price of buying the freehold be lower than the 3 other flats given that we have a much longer lease than the other 3? How does this work?

    4. How many leaseholders (out of 5) do we need to be willing to buy the freehold jointly and thus force the freeholder to sell? I believe there is a minimum number, what is it?

    5. I believe we would have to serve notice on the freeholder, how does that work?

    Many thanks for your help!

  • #2
    In your situation, I would not buy the freehold. You are happy with the freeholder and he takes good care of the building and the service charges are reasonable. Share of freehold can be a major headache with input from 5 different leaseholders. Don't assume that you will all agree especially as flats will be sold and you will have new leaseholders. As your lease is long, share of freehold will not add much value to your flat at all. It won't add value to those with short leases either - they will still need to extend. Unless you employ a managing agent, you will have to deal with all the daya to day runnings, accounts etc. Really not worth the headache.

    You will also run into problems deciding how much each must pay for their share. The ones with a shorter lease should pay more, but probably will want to pay the same plus get an extension for free.

    One of my share of freehold flat is great. We all get on well and there are no major differences. The other is a nightmare with a one rogue director and leaseholders who don't pay their service charges, legal issues - I could go on.


    • #3
      That's an interesting point of view which I hadn't thought of.

      Do you mean that the market value of a flat with a lease of 162 years remaining is the same as if the same flat had a share of the freehold?


      • #4
        Agree with last post leave things alone


        • #5
          Originally posted by verylonglease View Post

          Do you mean that the market value of a flat with a lease of 162 years remaining is the same as if the same flat had a share of the freehold?
          Yes - it is the length of the lease that is valuable. Only if you have exhorbitant service charges, a terrible freeholder or a short lease that needs extending, then it would be worth pursuing the purchase of the freehold.


          • #6
            Originally posted by bbva View Post
            Yes - it is the length of the lease that is valuable. Only if you have exhorbitant service charges, a terrible freeholder or a short lease that needs extending, then it would be worth pursuing the purchase of the freehold.
            and then only if you can't fix (either of) the first two with an RTM.


            • #7

              A lease is only a longterm rental agreement and I think its better to own a share of the freehold ( and the building ).

              1. The free guides to "enfranchisement for block of flats" and the "valuation price" may be downloaded from .

              2. In the situation of your block with 5 flats where 2 flats ( A&B) have already extended to 160 years and pay no ground rent and 3 flats (C,D&E) at 72 years paying ground rent, the freeholder can expect to receive the compensation fees for extending the 3 x 72 years leases and afterwards no more ground rent.

              3 You can calculate a rough cost for statutory lease extension for each flat using the sgclacy's method posted on LZforum No. 11080 ( lets say the calculated cost comes to approx 9000 per flat )

              4. Then write out a proposal for "collectively buying the freehold" with a bid price composed :

              Flat A = 250 (say, since lease extension already paid )
              Flat B = 250 ( as above )
              Flat C = 9000 (equal to cost of 90 yrs statutory lease extension)
              Flat D = 9000 (as above)
              Flat E = 9000 ( as above)

              Total = 28,000 ( example)

              5. You need to get quotes from a specialist solicitor firm to handle the conveyancing + producing the new lease to 999 years ( say quote is X pds )

              6 Write a letter inviting each flat owner to participate in buying the freehold and quote approx cost to each flat ( 200 + X/5 or 9000 + X/5 pds ) and make an appointment to discuss with each flat owner and see what response you get.

              Thats how I would suggest you start. If you can get 100% participation , then put an offer to the freeholder.


              Latest Activity


              • Clarification on lease and recovering costs
                Please can someone clarify the meaning of this section of the lease;

                "to indemnify the landlords against all costs charges and expenses (including legal costs and fees payable to any surveyor) which may be incurred or be borne by the landlords
                (a) in or in contemplation of any...
                20-08-2017, 11:45 AM
              • Reply to Clarification on lease and recovering costs
                We are due to attend the FTT on the breach of covenant so if they deem the breach to have occurred then I am thinking (b) could apply. In any event I think (c) would apply as the costs have been incurred in pursuing the leaseholder to remedy the breach and repair the property back to it's original state....
                20-08-2017, 20:37 PM
              • Ground rent rpi base

                Hopefully an easy question but does anyone know if when the ground rent is rpi linked is it from when the leasehold was set up or when you purchased the property. I.e if leasehold was set up in dec 12 but the property was purchased in Sept 13 is the base from dec12 or Sept 13?...
                20-08-2017, 08:48 AM
              • Reply to Ground rent rpi base
                The 1993 Act did not regard ground rents of little signicance - the full value had to be reflected in the valuation

                by having a nil ground rent it was deigned to make it a complete formality for a lender to agree to the deed, originally it was intended that mortgagees consent would not...
                20-08-2017, 15:31 PM
              • Reply to Clarification on lease and recovering costs
                Yes generally accepting the lease as continuing (by demanding and accepting rent/services charges) means you have waived any right to forfeit and so any right to costs, Im really not sure what b) and c) mean, a|) is the standard clause in most leases, Im not sure b) or c) cover breach of a covenant...
                20-08-2017, 14:16 PM
              • Reply to Ground rent rpi base
                "Two properties exactly the same one with a ground rent of a peppercorn and the other with a rent of £250 per annum will attract two differing sale prices. The one with a ground rent will clearly sell for less and the discount in the price is in effect a loan and the interest on that loan is in...
                20-08-2017, 13:39 PM
              • Reply to Ground rent rpi base
                Rents linked to the RPI protects both the landlord and the tenant. From the landlords perspective it protects the rent from the adverse effects of inflation and from the Tenants point of view protects them from the consequences of the estimate of future inflation being wrong. For example if inflation...
                20-08-2017, 11:53 AM
              • Reply to Ground rent rpi base
                I ran some capitalisations assuming an original 99 year lease worth £100K when new with 79 years term left to run using the following variables:-

                Increment rate (years): 15, 20, 25, 33
                Method: RPI% @ 2.5%,3.5%,4.5% versus fixed doubling
                Initial amounts: £100, £150, £200,...
                20-08-2017, 11:08 AM
              • Calling a meeting
                We have not had a meeting for about four years and know nothing about the accounts or what is happening as I am not notified about a thing. When I asked for information about the accounts I was told to go to the Companies House web site but that doesnt tell me a thing.

                I have sent out a...
                19-08-2017, 19:37 PM
              • Reply to Calling a meeting

                I have no connection other than reading RAM's posts but in this case I'd probably follow whatever RAM suggests.

                S21 is like all leaseholder rights - a chocolate fireguard. Yes there is a criminal offence and a fine. Wooo, scare me, they say.

                The Court of Appeal...
                20-08-2017, 10:52 AM