Unauthorised works by Leaseholder

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Unauthorised works by Leaseholder

    I'm sorry this may sound long-winded...
    One of my leaseholders had alterations done some time ago to the flue of their gas boiler which is installed vertically from the ground floor up through the chimney of the building - which is a terrace converted into maisonettes.

    They replaced what had been a compliant and effective metal cover that allowed for the safe release of their emissions at the top of the chimney, and also kept the chimney watertight and sealed from wildlife.Their plumber however removed this and installed an air intake pipe that made it impossible to protect the chimney from rain and the chimney pot has been left open for some time. The installation seems to have required the removal of the chimney pot from the chimney block leaving the cement crown damaged and the pot repositioned with poor workmanship evident.

    I have asked the leaseholder on several ocassions to fix this so that the chimney could be protected from water ingress. No permission was sought for the work or for access to this part of the building which is not part of their premises.

    Their flat is currently unoccupied as they sublet and their gas safety cert expired on 31 Dec due to non-compliance with the new flues in voids regulations - as such their boiler has been labelled "At Risk" by GasSafe and they are investigating ways to reflue to comply.

    Do I have the right to call my own plumber to disconnect their flue extension and protect my building from water getting in every time it rains? There is already much tension with this leaseholder as they seem indifferent to their obligation to obtain permission for any work that affects the building. I want to make sure that I don't overstep what I may legally do. They have been asked to do something about this for several months.

    Thank you for any advice.

  • #2
    The lease may allow you to enter and inspect, enter and repair and enter and repair or re charge the cost of the works.
    The lessee however can always sue for harassment and over breach of quiet enjoyment, and who wins/loses depends on the facts, and that while damage is being caused, the unit is empty, and it might be appropriate to simply tape a bag over it.

    That said your insurance may require that properties that are empty over 30 days start to affect cover and combined with the gas you may have to have your solicitor send them a letter notifying that they are in breach and you intend to take action unless they remedy it forthwith.
    Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks

      The lease will allow for that. While the flat was empty twice this week the owner has visited and twice has put on the gas boiler, despite there being an "At Risk" notice stuck on the front.Is this a breach of GSIUR Regs 1998? If so what do I do about that?

      I've written to tell them I'm putting a bag on.

      To JKO - I can't see your response here, but it was on my email. LHolder won't resite boiler,deviate flue, or go electric. I can't see how a chimney installation from ground floor with only inspection opportunity at base and top some 20 metres up can satisfy the new regs either.

      Comment


      • #4
        Hi Tom.

        I did remove my post because I erroneously thought that an 'at risk' label prevents the boiler being used. (I remembered that one of mine has such a label, due to overzealous rule interpretation by B*****h Gas wanting to get some more work from me. )

        On the bright side though, I can't see that he would get anyone to move in with such a label in place. I would have thought removing it would be an offence.

        Comment

        Latest Activity

        Collapse

        • Freehold management accounts
          pernes
          Hi, we have just received the year ending financial accounts, albeit late and after the agm.

          the managing agent took control from the beginning of our financial year, a year ago, I'm trying to work out from the accounts produced by the RTM board year ending 2015, what the year end figure...
          19-07-2017, 12:54 PM
        • Reply to Freehold management accounts
          leaseholder64
          If, as is looking likely, the garage and main fund are distinct, the garage fund should not have been reduced in the accounts by the "transfer".

          As well as any money still in the bank, the loan to the main fund should also be shown as an asset. They should total to the amount...
          22-08-2017, 23:22 PM
        • Reply to Freehold management accounts
          leaseholder64
          Is the garage sinking fund explicitly mentioned in the lease, or is it just a management account for convenience in reporting.

          If explicitly mentioned, it is probably illegal to cross-subsidise between it and other parts of the moneys held in trust, even though it is legal to have one bank...
          22-08-2017, 21:24 PM
        • Reply to Freehold management accounts
          pernes
          Hi, I have just had it confirmed that the money was transferred from the garage sinking fund in 2015 into the main account to partly cover the deficit in the main account. The remaining balance has stayed in the main reserve account. The garage lease states that once the accounts have been audited...
          22-08-2017, 20:41 PM
        • service charge payments
          Squeaky
          Hi, there are 36 flats, 12 flats per block where I live. My lease says my contribution is one thirty sixth for a 2 bed. Looking at the service charge payments provided I can't work out what percentage the other flats pay, some are 1 and 3 bed as the amounts noted are different for the same size flats....
          21-08-2017, 19:57 PM
        • Reply to service charge payments
          leaseholder64
          Is this £550 for one garage, or £550 for all 33? £550 for one garage would require a section 20 notice, as there is no routine work that will come to that much. £550 for 33 means you are arguing about less than 55p.
          22-08-2017, 17:20 PM
        • Reply to service charge payments
          AndrewDod
          The calculations may be wrong but you are still asking the wrong question.

          The lease will specify what repairs/maintenance (etc) are to be carried out under the lease. (X)
          The lease will specify what proportion of X you pay.

          If the lease says work includes work on the...
          22-08-2017, 17:04 PM
        • Hidden Admin Fees
          37eeyore
          My son is a leaseholder in an ex local authority flat that is now owned by a housing authority. I have recently been checking his service charge bill and received a summary of charges and copies of the repairs invoices. When I matched up the invoices to the summary I discovered that every invoice had...
          28-01-2017, 13:32 PM
        • Reply to Hidden Admin Fees
          leaseholder64
          The lease only seems to allow the actual administration cost. Mine allows reasonable fees of a managing agent.

          It sounds to me as though they have switched from an overall fee to a percentage, rather than charging both. Charging both is likely to be unreasonable for day to day costs....
          22-08-2017, 16:31 PM
        • Reply to Hidden Admin Fees
          37eeyore
          ANDYDD

          The lease says - all other costs incurred by the Landlord in or in connection with maintenance or management of the building.
          Which seems to mean they can charge anything they want.

          Can you tell me where it says he can only recover the actual cost of repairs as...
          22-08-2017, 16:16 PM
        Working...
        X