access doors and the law????

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    access doors and the law????

    hi, I currently own a ground floor flat. the upstairs flat has just been
    repossed by a letting agency. there is a shared front door which is
    property of us the downstairs flat owners but with access for the upstairs tennants. since the proerty was taken by this letting agency they have
    changed the front door lock. the front door lock is my property and they
    only have access so do they have the right to change said lock without my
    permission? I have since changed the locks back and am now being threatened with legal action. also is it my responsobility to provide them with a key to this lock or is it that of the previous tennant? Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thankyou.

    #2
    Surely any door that has to be used by both flats would be jointly owned.
    I offer no guarantee that anything I say is correct. wysiwyg

    Comment


      #3
      Does your lease actually say that the shared front door is part of your property? (It seems more likely that the communal areas are owned by the freeholder).

      Who is threatening you with legal action? The letting agent? The leaseholder of the upstairs flat? The freeholder? What is being alleged or demanded?

      The dispute has nothing to do with the former tenant.

      Comment


        #4
        Have you reported the criminal damage (changed lock) to Police & obtained CRN?
        I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...

        Comment


          #5
          You need to read the lease and provide us with the clause that you believe makes it your property or demised to you.


          As mentioned abiove this would be unusual aas it normally would be common land owned by the freeholder or shared.

          What does the lease say about who is liable to repairs to the door and what does it say about access/rights to pass ?

          Andy
          Advice given is based on my experience representing myself as a leaseholder both in the County Court and at Leasehold Valuation Tribunals.

          I do not accept any liability to you in relation to the advice given.

          It is always recommended you seek further advice from a solicitor or legal expert.

          Always read your lease first, it is the legally binding contract between leaseholder and freeholder.

          Comment


            #6
            If the lock was changed, I assume you were unable to gain access
            to your flat, it that is the case, it's you who should be threatening
            the agent, as if that is the case, they have no right to prevent access
            to your home.

            If they did not supply YOU with a key to get into your home, then
            don't supply one to them.
            If they want a key, they ask the owner of the flat to write to you,
            proving he is the owner, and then and only then, will you give a key
            to the owner.

            R.a.M.

            Comment


              #7
              In a block of flats, the front entrance door into building will be owned by the freeholder. So the letting agent for other flatwill have no legal right to change the lock.

              So who is threatening legal action against you ?

              Comment


                #8
                Whether the door is owned by the freeholder, you, or jointly ( unlikely) the agent cannot change the lock which is not their clients property, not bar your access to your home.

                Having changed the lock, that is as a result of their having changed the lock in the circumstances above and therefore owe you the cost of a new lock and the keys.

                Even if they made the error they could have easily remedied by providing you with additional keys at their costs.

                Start with your lease.
                Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

                Comment

                Latest Activity

                Collapse

                • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
                  by eagle2
                  The cost of extending a lease is not a service charge expense so there is no reason to allocate it on the 38/31/31 basis, your offer to split those costs equally seems to be reasonable. It is up to the freeholder to decide what is fair and reasonable for the service charges and it is up to the other...
                  28-05-2022, 05:29 AM
                • Share of feehold/shared service charges?
                  by Stu1020
                  Hi there,

                  I'm new to the forum and looking for advice on a sticky freehold situation.

                  I own a two-bed flat in a converted building with two one-beds. The lease states that a fair proportion is payable towards the service charge. However, there has been a running agreement of...
                  20-05-2022, 11:39 AM
                • Reply to Old managing agents accounts
                  by eagle2
                  Unless the handover took place at the end of the financial year, it is the RTM's responsibility to produce the annual accounts. You could try making a formal complaint against the agent to supply copies of all supporting documents, it should belong to a redress scheme. The difficulty is that the agent...
                  28-05-2022, 05:05 AM
                • Old managing agents accounts
                  by jazzythumper
                  Since obtaining the RTM and changing the managing agent, we have never been given full accounts / receipts for the previous year(s). We believe that as the old freeholder and leaser holder of one of the flats were represented by the same solicitor that prior to the sale of the freehold, we were subsidising...
                  20-05-2022, 11:21 AM
                • Reply to Freehold confusion
                  by CStevens
                  The property should be registered so the land registry should hold a copy of the leases. You would need to look at the leases to see who is responsible for what but normally in a maisonette situation the freeholder would insure and maintain the structure, foundation and roof with the leaseholders paying...
                  27-05-2022, 21:58 PM
                • Freehold confusion
                  by davetg
                  30 years ago I bought a flat from a friend. The freehold at the time was registered to my friend and the lady who owned the other flat. I understood at the time that I would replace the friend on the freehold but this never happened. This was not a problem until now as when work on the structure of...
                  24-05-2022, 14:29 PM
                • Reply to Freehold confusion
                  by CStevens
                  Yeah i guess i would agree with that but, as you say, the value is only to the leaseholders and a freehold subject to 999 years is not worth a great deal of money to anyone other than the occupants and in fact, if the leases are drafted correctly, they should require the leaseholders to become members...
                  27-05-2022, 21:52 PM
                • 2-1 transfer - what does Freeholder do?
                  by Flashback1966
                  I am a Freeholder. Have a flat there too. I have received an email from the leaseholder's soclitors acting for Mr A. They are doing a 2-1 transfer from the names of Mr A and Ms B to just Mr.

                  The solicitors want to know the requirements on completion.

                  Is is just a notice of...
                  26-05-2022, 18:46 PM
                • Reply to 2-1 transfer - what does Freeholder do?
                  by Gordon999
                  I suggest you reply to leaseholder's solicitor and request a copy of the land registry title to confirm the name of new leaseholder plus £15 registration fee....
                  27-05-2022, 18:05 PM
                • Reply to Freehold confusion
                  by davetg
                  Thanks for the replies:-
                  My friend is alive and well and shows up on google as he is very high up in a big American telecoms company so I should be able to get back in touch.

                  I can't see my friend having any problem with the TR1 me replacing him on the freehold was always what was...
                  27-05-2022, 16:50 PM
                Working...
                X