Applying for Building Regs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wobble
    replied
    Hello,

    I spoke with the council this morning and as it is a civil matter there is nothing for them to do unless my name as an interested party does not appear on the planning app, then they can take it up with him. However, emailed details to my sol and he said I should write to other party saying I am aware of what he is trying, I have made my feelings clear, and if he starts any work will take out an injunction to stop him. My sol doesn't deal with that sort of thing but he knows a man who does (!) My sol had already written to him to say the cellar/basement is mine and he must not do anything in or to it, so I will write as suggested today. Is there any other way I can object as you suggest please?

    Many thanks

    W

    Leave a comment:


  • leaseholdanswers
    replied
    But you must object now before consent is granted or you will have to have a court overturn it.

    Your solicitor should also be making the representation too.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wobble
    replied
    Thank you LHA that's reassuring.

    Wobble

    Leave a comment:


  • leaseholdanswers
    replied
    He can apply for any permission over any land, but if has has applied as owner and or not notified the real owner then his application is invalid.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wobble
    replied
    Sorry chaps, didn't mean to make that sound like LHA and R.a.M. advised my solicitor, I meant I took all the advice I could get, including my solicitors, and he consequently sent said letter!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Wobble
    started a topic Applying for Building Regs

    Applying for Building Regs

    Hi to all again,

    Further to my previous posts on the advice of LHA and R.a.M my solicitor sent a letter to the leaseholder of downstairs flat saying cellar wasn't even in the lease and they were not to do anything in or to it etc. On a whim I checked the local council website today and find the sneaky so and so has applied (for the second time, the first was refused) for building regs for the alterations he wanted to do! I plan on contacting the council dept on Monday to inform them he has no consent, (and no cellar). I thought that a letter from my sol would stop him, but it seems he is determined to ignore me! Once I inform the council surely they would not grant building regs, and that should stop his plans, no? If he carries on anyway, apart from taking out an injunction, would my best bet be to report him to Planning Control and let them take over?

    Any advice gratefully received,

    Many thanks,

    Wobble

Latest Activity

Collapse

  • Building works & S20 process
    by RichA
    Hi. I have a freehold after selling a leasehold flat in a block of 4 flats. We don't currently have a managing agent, so these duties currently fall to me (I am holding off appointing a managing agent whilst the leaseholders consider whether they want to RTM).

    The block needs some maintenance...
    21-05-2022, 17:20 PM
  • Reply to Building works & S20 process
    by Gordon999
    The S20 consultation with leaseholders is required for any planned works which exceed £250 cost per flat.

    If any planned works are quoted below £1000, you could place the order on the supplier with lowest quote. .

    If the freeholder is self- managing the building maintenance,...
    28-05-2022, 09:56 AM
  • Share of feehold/shared service charges?
    by Stu1020
    Hi there,

    I'm new to the forum and looking for advice on a sticky freehold situation.

    I own a two-bed flat in a converted building with two one-beds. The lease states that a fair proportion is payable towards the service charge. However, there has been a running agreement of...
    20-05-2022, 11:39 AM
  • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
    by sgclacy
    You appear to have bought into the flat knowing at the time your share is 38% and having owned the flat feel that this is unjust.

    Did you raise any concerns questions at the time of purchase that in a three flat split you would be paying more than 33.33% . Could it be argued that the unfairness...
    28-05-2022, 09:04 AM
  • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
    by eagle2
    The cost of extending a lease is not a service charge expense so there is no reason to allocate it on the 38/31/31 basis, your offer to split those costs equally seems to be reasonable. It is up to the freeholder to decide what is fair and reasonable for the service charges and it is up to the other...
    28-05-2022, 05:29 AM
  • Reply to Old managing agents accounts
    by eagle2
    Unless the handover took place at the end of the financial year, it is the RTM's responsibility to produce the annual accounts. You could try making a formal complaint against the agent to supply copies of all supporting documents, it should belong to a redress scheme. The difficulty is that the agent...
    28-05-2022, 05:05 AM
  • Old managing agents accounts
    by jazzythumper
    Since obtaining the RTM and changing the managing agent, we have never been given full accounts / receipts for the previous year(s). We believe that as the old freeholder and leaser holder of one of the flats were represented by the same solicitor that prior to the sale of the freehold, we were subsidising...
    20-05-2022, 11:21 AM
  • Freehold confusion
    by davetg
    30 years ago I bought a flat from a friend. The freehold at the time was registered to my friend and the lady who owned the other flat. I understood at the time that I would replace the friend on the freehold but this never happened. This was not a problem until now as when work on the structure of...
    24-05-2022, 14:29 PM
  • Reply to Freehold confusion
    by CStevens
    davetg,

    The property should be registered so the land registry should hold a copy of the leases. You would need to look at the leases to see who is responsible for what but normally in a maisonette situation the freeholder would insure and maintain the structure, foundation and roof with...
    27-05-2022, 21:58 PM
  • Reply to Freehold confusion
    by CStevens
    Yeah i guess i would agree with that but, as you say, the value is only to the leaseholders and a freehold subject to 999 years is not worth a great deal of money to anyone other than the occupants and in fact, if the leases are drafted correctly, they should require the leaseholders to become members...
    27-05-2022, 21:52 PM
Working...
X