Freeholder persists to claim registration charge to underlet despite LVT decision.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Freeholder persists to claim registration charge to underlet despite LVT decision.

    Following an application to the LVT to define reasonable fees in respect of permission to underlet, Estates & Management representing Gradeband, the freeholder,acknowledge the LVT decision about the variable administration charge and that they pay my application costs, but still try to charge me a registration fee with each new tenancy agreement. The LVT stated that the registration fee demanded is not a variable administration charge as defined in the Act but nevertheless stated that their interpretation of the lease is that I am not liable for such a charge.
    My question is what legal right can they have when my interpretation of the lease is backed in no uncertain terms by the LVT?

    I have written to them rejecting the claim and demanding a cheque for the £50 costs.

    #2
    Both companies which you mention are members of Consensus Business Group controlled by Vincent Tchenguiz. You can view the company structure at www.cqra.org and find them under Cos.no. 175 for E&M and 191 for Gradeband :

    http://www.cqra.org/index.php/lvt/11...h-2011#Company Listing


    Please post (1) the LVT case reference number or weblink and (2) what are E&M are required to re-pay you on LVT application costs ( 3) what are E&M now demanding.

    Comment


      #3
      I think events have rather overtaken that statement.....

      If the LVT ruled that the registration fee is not one over which they have control, that rather suggests that there is a fee due.

      As requested if you can quote the clause in the lease that they rely on we can comment.

      Otherwise you would have to apply to the county court, or wait for them to sue for it/them and challenge it then.
      Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

      Comment


        #4
        Presumably if Gilbertcat just keeps paying his ground rent, and E&M keep accepting it, haven't they waived any 'breach' of which they are aware, Leaseholdanswers?
        To save them chiming in, JPKeates, Theartfullodger, Boletus, Mindthegap, Macromia, Holy Cow & Ted.E.Bear think the opposite of me on almost every subject.

        Comment


          #5
          There is no breach in not paying a fee; the concern is that when they come to sell the purchaser will have their notice rejected creating a headache for all concerned.
          Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by leaseholdanswers View Post

            Otherwise you would have to apply to the county court, or wait for them to sue for it/them and challenge it then.
            Hi Leaseholdanswers, out of interest, what type of claim would the leaseholder make to the County Court?

            Comment


              #7
              Thank you for your comments.

              Regarding charges for registering underlettings, the LVT wrote:


              For what it is worth... whilst we consider that the Applicant must give notice of underlettings, we agree that no registration fee is payable. The Respondent argued that the registration of underlettings is required by paragrapgh 27.1 of the Eighth Schedule to the lease, which provides: -

              “To give written notice within 28 days to the lessor and to the Management Company (or their agents) of any assignment transfer mortgage charge grant of probate letters of administration order of court or other matter disposing of or affecting the Demised Premises or devolution of or transfer of title to the same … and also pay … such reasonable fee appropriate at the time of registration in respect of any such dealing …”

              However, the absence of any mention of underlettings from the list set out above is striking, and leads us to conclude that its omission must have been deliberate. The logic behind the exclusion of underlettings from this notification requirement is not difficult to discern: it is because notification/registration of lettings is covered by a different provision in the Lease … which makes no provision for the payment of a registration fee (and where the right to charge such a fee cannot be implied).
              My question remains - what course is open to E&M or me to resolve this ,matter. E&M are ordered by the LVT to pay our costs of £50 within 14 days. Not yet received! Due by 24th March.

              Comment


                #8
                Don't hold your breath for your £50!

                I asked for suggestions to help you on TTAS:

                http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co...#comment-71686

                I was told that E&M are desperate for cash to keep running. (They also asked me for £75 for registration a few weeks ago, after the LVT and Lands Chamber both confirmed that my lease does not call for it.)

                I suppose if you really want to escalate this, you can issue a County Court Claim for the £50. Then if they still don't pay you, perhaps apply for them to be wound up!
                To save them chiming in, JPKeates, Theartfullodger, Boletus, Mindthegap, Macromia, Holy Cow & Ted.E.Bear think the opposite of me on almost every subject.

                Comment


                  #9
                  or other matter disposing of or affecting the Demised Premises
                  Is fairly clear, an underletting of the whole certainly affects the premises. I can't for the life o me see how te Chair arrived at that conclusion, they certainly would get an argument from me if acting for a landlord.

                  if they concluded that a notice is due under this clause it follows that a fee is due.

                  But that's the risk when landlord's turn up with boiler plate arguments.

                  Give notice and offer a fee. if they decline to accept the notice that is their commercial decision you have complied with the lease by notifying and offering payment of a fee. You are hardly in breach...!

                  Let them sue for £40. I think the court will have a lot to say about that.
                  Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

                  Comment

                  Latest Activity

                  Collapse

                  • Share of feehold/shared service charges?
                    by Stu1020
                    Hi there,

                    I'm new to the forum and looking for advice on a sticky freehold situation.

                    I own a two-bed flat in a converted building with two one-beds. The lease states that a fair proportion is payable towards the service charge. However, there has been a running agreement of...
                    20-05-2022, 11:39 AM
                  • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
                    by Gordon999
                    Since your flat has 2 bedrooms and other flats have one bedroom, you should keep the existing 38:31:31 split as fair contribution to the annual service charge account.

                    For lease extension, the cost is mainly solicitors charges plus registration charge at Land Registry and Mortgage Lender.(...
                    28-05-2022, 10:48 AM
                  • Reply to Building works & S20 process
                    by Gordon999
                    The S20 consultation with leaseholders is required for any planned works which exceed £250 cost per flat.

                    If any planned works are quoted below £1000, you could place the order on the supplier with lowest quote. .

                    If the freeholder is self- managing the building maintenance,...
                    28-05-2022, 09:56 AM
                  • Building works & S20 process
                    by RichA
                    Hi. I have a freehold after selling a leasehold flat in a block of 4 flats. We don't currently have a managing agent, so these duties currently fall to me (I am holding off appointing a managing agent whilst the leaseholders consider whether they want to RTM).

                    The block needs some maintenance...
                    21-05-2022, 17:20 PM
                  • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
                    by sgclacy
                    You appear to have bought into the flat knowing at the time your share is 38% and having owned the flat feel that this is unjust.

                    Did you raise any concerns questions at the time of purchase that in a three flat split you would be paying more than 33.33% . Could it be argued that the unfairness...
                    28-05-2022, 09:04 AM
                  • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
                    by eagle2
                    The cost of extending a lease is not a service charge expense so there is no reason to allocate it on the 38/31/31 basis, your offer to split those costs equally seems to be reasonable. It is up to the freeholder to decide what is fair and reasonable for the service charges and it is up to the other...
                    28-05-2022, 05:29 AM
                  • Reply to Old managing agents accounts
                    by eagle2
                    Unless the handover took place at the end of the financial year, it is the RTM's responsibility to produce the annual accounts. You could try making a formal complaint against the agent to supply copies of all supporting documents, it should belong to a redress scheme. The difficulty is that the agent...
                    28-05-2022, 05:05 AM
                  • Old managing agents accounts
                    by jazzythumper
                    Since obtaining the RTM and changing the managing agent, we have never been given full accounts / receipts for the previous year(s). We believe that as the old freeholder and leaser holder of one of the flats were represented by the same solicitor that prior to the sale of the freehold, we were subsidising...
                    20-05-2022, 11:21 AM
                  • Freehold confusion
                    by davetg
                    30 years ago I bought a flat from a friend. The freehold at the time was registered to my friend and the lady who owned the other flat. I understood at the time that I would replace the friend on the freehold but this never happened. This was not a problem until now as when work on the structure of...
                    24-05-2022, 14:29 PM
                  • Reply to Freehold confusion
                    by CStevens
                    davetg,

                    The property should be registered so the land registry should hold a copy of the leases. You would need to look at the leases to see who is responsible for what but normally in a maisonette situation the freeholder would insure and maintain the structure, foundation and roof with...
                    27-05-2022, 21:58 PM
                  Working...
                  X