varying our leaseholder's lease

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    varying our leaseholder's lease

    Hello

    I am new to the forum, I hope you can help.

    We are a block of 3. The freehold is held by 2 of the flats (owner occupied). Our leaseholder rents out his flat and we have had a nightmare over the years getting him to contribute to works etc.

    We feel that we are being held to ransom by an absent leaseholder who is the minority in the building as he relies on the fact that we don't want to fight and would just like to live in peace. Its frustrating that he wants the benefit of us owner occupiers that want a nice home whilst he contributes very little.

    The problem is made worse by the fact that we have a poorly worded and vague lease. Issues are arising regarding the intercom system, health and safety issues e.g. installing emergency lighting.

    Our leaseholder will never agree to it but if 2 out of 3 leaseholders (both also being freeholders) agree ... can we apply to the LVT to vary the terms of all out leases to cover issues such as health and safety obligations etc that were never in the mind of lawyers drafting the original leases? what are the risks? and costs?
    Thank you for any assistance

    Zena

    #2
    I am afraid that you cannot change the lease terms along the lines you would like without the tenant's consent.

    "he relies on the fact that we don't want to fight and would just like to live in peace"

    You have to make a decision whether you let that go on.

    Comment


      #3
      But where they do no t agree you can resort to mediation arbitration or determination by the LVT.

      Where the leaseholder will not consent to a variation you may be able to vary the lease, and corresponding leases ie the other 2, by application under section 35 and 36, and/or by majority under s37 of the landlord and Tenant Act 1987.

      The grounds would be that the leases fail to make, in broad terms, satisfactory provision for repair of the building.

      http://www.lease-advice.org/publicat...asp?item=18#19
      Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

      Comment


        #4
        Thank you for your help.

        I don't think section 35 will apply as we are a block of 3 flats. However section 37 may be helpful. If 2 out of the 3 leaseholders agree then we can make a majority application to the LVT include the one non-consenting lease. The Act doesn't seem to state that these leaseholders cannot also be freeholders.

        I think we may need to take legal advice on whether our grounds are reasonable and cost risks.

        Thank you again

        Zena

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by zena View Post
          Thank you for your help.

          I don't think section 35 will apply as we are a block of 3 flats. However section 37 may be helpful. If 2 out of the 3 leaseholders agree then we can make a majority application to the LVT include the one non-consenting lease. The Act doesn't seem to state that these leaseholders cannot also be freeholders.

          I think we may need to take legal advice on whether our grounds are reasonable and cost risks.

          Thank you again

          Zena

          Erm confused by the reply; you can apply as a leaseholder or freeholder(s). if you referring to the qualifier which from memory is 3 + flats, that refers to, eg, a head lease which contains 3 or more flats in one demise, not three flats with long leases and no intervening head lease.
          Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

          Comment

          Latest Activity

          Collapse

          • Replacing RMC with RTM
            Centurino
            In seven days time we have a residents meeting to decide on the future of our apartment blocks; one with nine apartments, one with four apartments, thirteen total. They are about three meters apart physically. Our freeholder liquidated in 2012 and the lender took over as default who then set up an RMC...
            11-02-2019, 16:11 PM
          • Reply to Replacing RMC with RTM
            Wire01
            In the “eagle2” post 15-02-2019, 16:40 it says
            It would appear that the mortgage company is currently entitled as freeholder to charge you ground rent and service charges. If the mortgage company instructs the managing agent to act on its behalf, the agent can then demand charges from you, subject...
            16-02-2019, 19:23 PM
          • Problem with block management company
            Kwizzy53
            I need to report a block management company for rudeness and bullying towards landlords with leasehold flats but I cannot find their membership of an ombudsman scheme. I don't know where to go.
            30-11-2015, 19:05 PM
          • Reply to Problem with block management company
            ANDIR
            We have the same issue. We have a Chairman and about 6 directors. The Chairman thinks they are the CEO of a FTSE 100 company and instructs all emails and basically runs the show, all final decisions seem to stop with them. They control everything, gets their relative to give their opinion and uses...
            16-02-2019, 17:51 PM
          • Freeholder duties
            FreeH1
            I am trying to sell my flat for which I have a shared freehold with the 2 other flats in the block.

            Today I have been informed that one of the freeholders is refusing to complete and return the TR1 (and another form I believe is the PR1?). Without this we are unable to continue with the...
            15-02-2019, 18:49 PM
          • Reply to Freeholder duties
            Sarah B
            I recently bought a flat where this was the case and an ID1 form was requested after completion, I don't remember a TR1 which required signing for the freehold to constrain the sale (we already owned a flat in the block so would have seen it). If they don't sign you can apply to the court for a transfer...
            16-02-2019, 13:19 PM
          • Management fee 20% - too high?
            WAM
            I have been a leaseholder in a block of four maisonettes (NE Surrey / London) for many years with a recent change of managing agent (same freeholder).

            The previous managing agent allowed repairs and maintenance to be done by the leaseholders, and there were no management fees.
            ...
            12-02-2019, 10:58 AM
          • Reply to Management fee 20% - too high?
            Sarah B
            OK I didn't meant to infringe the rules, let me rephrase - what kind of landlord? is it an individual or a company, if a company is it a developer or estate company?
            16-02-2019, 13:14 PM
          • Reply to Freeholder duties
            leaseholder64
            Any duty will be in the lease or the deed of trust, neither of which I can read from here.
            16-02-2019, 10:10 AM
          • transitioning from FTT appointed manager back to RTM
            poppyfield
            Hello,

            Would be extremely grateful for help with this from someone with experience and knowledge of RTM companies:

            I am a leaseholder in a large (30) block of flats. Up until 4 years ago the building was under RTM management (for about 10 years), but for the last 4 we have...
            11-02-2019, 06:51 AM
          Working...
          X