varying our leaseholder's lease

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • zena
    started a topic varying our leaseholder's lease

    varying our leaseholder's lease

    Hello

    I am new to the forum, I hope you can help.

    We are a block of 3. The freehold is held by 2 of the flats (owner occupied). Our leaseholder rents out his flat and we have had a nightmare over the years getting him to contribute to works etc.

    We feel that we are being held to ransom by an absent leaseholder who is the minority in the building as he relies on the fact that we don't want to fight and would just like to live in peace. Its frustrating that he wants the benefit of us owner occupiers that want a nice home whilst he contributes very little.

    The problem is made worse by the fact that we have a poorly worded and vague lease. Issues are arising regarding the intercom system, health and safety issues e.g. installing emergency lighting.

    Our leaseholder will never agree to it but if 2 out of 3 leaseholders (both also being freeholders) agree ... can we apply to the LVT to vary the terms of all out leases to cover issues such as health and safety obligations etc that were never in the mind of lawyers drafting the original leases? what are the risks? and costs?
    Thank you for any assistance

    Zena

  • leaseholdanswers
    replied
    Originally posted by zena View Post
    Thank you for your help.

    I don't think section 35 will apply as we are a block of 3 flats. However section 37 may be helpful. If 2 out of the 3 leaseholders agree then we can make a majority application to the LVT include the one non-consenting lease. The Act doesn't seem to state that these leaseholders cannot also be freeholders.

    I think we may need to take legal advice on whether our grounds are reasonable and cost risks.

    Thank you again

    Zena

    Erm confused by the reply; you can apply as a leaseholder or freeholder(s). if you referring to the qualifier which from memory is 3 + flats, that refers to, eg, a head lease which contains 3 or more flats in one demise, not three flats with long leases and no intervening head lease.

    Leave a comment:


  • zena
    replied
    Thank you for your help.

    I don't think section 35 will apply as we are a block of 3 flats. However section 37 may be helpful. If 2 out of the 3 leaseholders agree then we can make a majority application to the LVT include the one non-consenting lease. The Act doesn't seem to state that these leaseholders cannot also be freeholders.

    I think we may need to take legal advice on whether our grounds are reasonable and cost risks.

    Thank you again

    Zena

    Leave a comment:


  • leaseholdanswers
    replied
    But where they do no t agree you can resort to mediation arbitration or determination by the LVT.

    Where the leaseholder will not consent to a variation you may be able to vary the lease, and corresponding leases ie the other 2, by application under section 35 and 36, and/or by majority under s37 of the landlord and Tenant Act 1987.

    The grounds would be that the leases fail to make, in broad terms, satisfactory provision for repair of the building.

    http://www.lease-advice.org/publicat...asp?item=18#19

    Leave a comment:


  • Lawcruncher
    replied
    I am afraid that you cannot change the lease terms along the lines you would like without the tenant's consent.

    "he relies on the fact that we don't want to fight and would just like to live in peace"

    You have to make a decision whether you let that go on.

    Leave a comment:

Latest Activity

Collapse

  • Homeless living in flats hallways
    RosieB
    Hello,

    My first time here - I'm lucky I've managed 8 years of land-lording without serious issue! Until now...

    My tenanted flat is on the 2nd floor of a block. There are 3 blocks in total on the estate. In the past 2 to 3 weeks my tenants have reported homeless people sleeping,...
    18-02-2019, 13:57 PM
  • Reply to Homeless living in flats hallways
    RosieB
    Common sense...
    19-02-2019, 17:35 PM
  • Share of freehold disputes
    Outnumbered
    Hello,
    I own the 1/4 share of freehold of a house, we are 4 flats in total. We arrange meetings on an adhoc basis when we feel there are issues to discuss, and we have email conversations about fixing things etc.
    At our last meeting things got heated and I felt ganged up upon by the 3 other...
    18-02-2019, 20:50 PM
  • Reply to Share of freehold disputes
    Outnumbered
    Thanks for your reply. I think the key thing here is properly arranged meeting, it has been previously been arranged at one of their houses over alcoholic drinks, last time I had underhanded racist comments, and shouting, to the point that I was afraid and had to leave. They want to hold the meeting...
    19-02-2019, 17:32 PM
  • Reply to Share of freehold disputes
    leaseholder64
    For a company, the rules for how decisions are made are in the articles of association of that company.

    Typically the rules for electronic communication is that everyone in the meeting must have access to all the information being communicated.

    Using our, ancient, pre-electronic...
    19-02-2019, 17:27 PM
  • Reply to Share of freehold disputes
    Macromia
    If the freehold is owned by a company you will need to check what is said in the company articles and in any existing regulations that have previously been correctly passed in accordance with the articles and any other applicable rules.

    I would personally expect that, if 75% of shareholders...
    19-02-2019, 17:17 PM
  • Reply to Share of freehold disputes
    Outnumbered
    The sharehold is owned by a company for which we are directors and hold 1/4 equal share. They are threatening to take a majority vote on decisions on the house if I don’t attend a meeting, so I want to know where I stand if I don’t attend. The last meeting got nasty and was unproductive, I prefer...
    19-02-2019, 17:12 PM
  • Section 20 despite long term neglect of the buildings
    redrabbit
    For the last 6 months myself and fellow residents have been trying to defend ourselves against freeholder company with S20 work. Incredibly frustrating as they seem to not have the answers to the most basic questions.

    Current estimate of work is £15k for each household.
    ...
    17-02-2019, 18:51 PM
  • Reply to Section 20 despite long term neglect of the buildings
    eagle2
    Please note that you need to be a leaseholder at the time that you make an application to the Tribunal or to the Court. Any application would need to be disclosed to the prospective purchaser and therefore could affect your sale.

    You should seek legal advice regarding the content of a...
    19-02-2019, 15:30 PM
  • Reply to Section 20 despite long term neglect of the buildings
    redrabbit
    Thanks everyone, some really useful views here.

    Our priority is to move house, and therefore we need this work to start in May, and finish 4 months later as the freeholder has stated. I am concerned it will overrun and also concerned about the quality. However, that's a separate issue...
    19-02-2019, 12:49 PM
Working...
X