varying our leaseholder's lease

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • zena
    started a topic varying our leaseholder's lease

    varying our leaseholder's lease

    Hello

    I am new to the forum, I hope you can help.

    We are a block of 3. The freehold is held by 2 of the flats (owner occupied). Our leaseholder rents out his flat and we have had a nightmare over the years getting him to contribute to works etc.

    We feel that we are being held to ransom by an absent leaseholder who is the minority in the building as he relies on the fact that we don't want to fight and would just like to live in peace. Its frustrating that he wants the benefit of us owner occupiers that want a nice home whilst he contributes very little.

    The problem is made worse by the fact that we have a poorly worded and vague lease. Issues are arising regarding the intercom system, health and safety issues e.g. installing emergency lighting.

    Our leaseholder will never agree to it but if 2 out of 3 leaseholders (both also being freeholders) agree ... can we apply to the LVT to vary the terms of all out leases to cover issues such as health and safety obligations etc that were never in the mind of lawyers drafting the original leases? what are the risks? and costs?
    Thank you for any assistance

    Zena

  • leaseholdanswers
    replied
    Originally posted by zena View Post
    Thank you for your help.

    I don't think section 35 will apply as we are a block of 3 flats. However section 37 may be helpful. If 2 out of the 3 leaseholders agree then we can make a majority application to the LVT include the one non-consenting lease. The Act doesn't seem to state that these leaseholders cannot also be freeholders.

    I think we may need to take legal advice on whether our grounds are reasonable and cost risks.

    Thank you again

    Zena

    Erm confused by the reply; you can apply as a leaseholder or freeholder(s). if you referring to the qualifier which from memory is 3 + flats, that refers to, eg, a head lease which contains 3 or more flats in one demise, not three flats with long leases and no intervening head lease.

    Leave a comment:


  • zena
    replied
    Thank you for your help.

    I don't think section 35 will apply as we are a block of 3 flats. However section 37 may be helpful. If 2 out of the 3 leaseholders agree then we can make a majority application to the LVT include the one non-consenting lease. The Act doesn't seem to state that these leaseholders cannot also be freeholders.

    I think we may need to take legal advice on whether our grounds are reasonable and cost risks.

    Thank you again

    Zena

    Leave a comment:


  • leaseholdanswers
    replied
    But where they do no t agree you can resort to mediation arbitration or determination by the LVT.

    Where the leaseholder will not consent to a variation you may be able to vary the lease, and corresponding leases ie the other 2, by application under section 35 and 36, and/or by majority under s37 of the landlord and Tenant Act 1987.

    The grounds would be that the leases fail to make, in broad terms, satisfactory provision for repair of the building.

    http://www.lease-advice.org/publicat...asp?item=18#19

    Leave a comment:


  • Lawcruncher
    replied
    I am afraid that you cannot change the lease terms along the lines you would like without the tenant's consent.

    "he relies on the fact that we don't want to fight and would just like to live in peace"

    You have to make a decision whether you let that go on.

    Leave a comment:

Latest Activity

Collapse

  • Appointing Property Manager
    scot22
    Do shareholders/leaseholders have any rights to determine appointment of a property manager ?
    19-04-2019, 17:04 PM
  • Reply to Appointing Property Manager
    leaseholder64
    Could the OP please clarify "property manager". What one appoints is a "manager", there is no "property" in the title. I think the only place that "property manager" appears in the legislation is in relation of the need to belong to a redress scheme, even then...
    20-04-2019, 09:14 AM
  • Reply to Appointing Property Manager
    leaseholder64
    The duty is to act in the best interests of the members as a whole, which is not not same as a duty to follow their wishes. A typical example might be fire safety. There is a good chance that the members would wish to fail to implement or even have, a fire risk assessment.

    I seem to remember...
    20-04-2019, 09:10 AM
  • RMC liabilities - not working in leaseholders interests?
    landlady2016
    I'll try to be brief and have made reference to a related problem before: For almost a decade roof repairs on a 34 flat estate have been needed and in the past few years action has been taken but at snails pace. I have had some useful comments on this forum. I now have internal damage and RMC have requested...
    18-04-2019, 08:35 AM
  • Reply to RMC liabilities - not working in leaseholders interests?
    eagle2
    The wording of the lease will determine whether or not directors may be paid as service charge expenditure out of service charge funds.

    It is not difficult to operate PAYE.

    There could be other issues though eg if the management company claims that it is dormant. ...
    20-04-2019, 09:05 AM
  • Reply to RMC liabilities - not working in leaseholders interests?
    leaseholder64
    Normal RMCs have no pot of money from which they could legally pay the directors.

    If they do pay the directors, they would need to register for and operate PAYE, as all directors's salaries however they are dressed up, are treated as employment income, for tax purposes.
    20-04-2019, 08:47 AM
  • Advice please
    pinathecat
    I live in a block of (11) privately owned flats.
    I am a resident and a director of the flats maintenance company.
    About 5 years ago, the company engaged the services of a local estate agency to purely run the maintenance side.
    So They just collect the monthly fees and look after...
    18-04-2019, 18:39 PM
  • Reply to Advice please
    eagle2
    I do not understand why commonhold has been raised within this thread, it makes absolutely no difference. Managing agents will continue to exceed their authority and the directors will still need to supervise them....
    20-04-2019, 06:50 AM
  • Reply to Advice please
    eagle2
    It is the directors who are appointed to make decisions and represent the leaseholders/members. There is no need to call a general meeting of members. You should keep minutes of the directors' meeting and inform the leaseholders/members.
    20-04-2019, 06:45 AM
  • Reply to Advice please
    eagle2
    I recommend that you do not manage yourself, it is much better to appoint an independent managing agent in this case. You would have a conflict of interest and your motives may be questioned. I suggest that you interview 2 or 3 agents and set out your requirements and see who best fits them, The new...
    20-04-2019, 06:35 AM
Working...
X