varying our leaseholder's lease

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • varying our leaseholder's lease

    Hello

    I am new to the forum, I hope you can help.

    We are a block of 3. The freehold is held by 2 of the flats (owner occupied). Our leaseholder rents out his flat and we have had a nightmare over the years getting him to contribute to works etc.

    We feel that we are being held to ransom by an absent leaseholder who is the minority in the building as he relies on the fact that we don't want to fight and would just like to live in peace. Its frustrating that he wants the benefit of us owner occupiers that want a nice home whilst he contributes very little.

    The problem is made worse by the fact that we have a poorly worded and vague lease. Issues are arising regarding the intercom system, health and safety issues e.g. installing emergency lighting.

    Our leaseholder will never agree to it but if 2 out of 3 leaseholders (both also being freeholders) agree ... can we apply to the LVT to vary the terms of all out leases to cover issues such as health and safety obligations etc that were never in the mind of lawyers drafting the original leases? what are the risks? and costs?
    Thank you for any assistance

    Zena

  • #2
    I am afraid that you cannot change the lease terms along the lines you would like without the tenant's consent.

    "he relies on the fact that we don't want to fight and would just like to live in peace"

    You have to make a decision whether you let that go on.

    Comment


    • #3
      But where they do no t agree you can resort to mediation arbitration or determination by the LVT.

      Where the leaseholder will not consent to a variation you may be able to vary the lease, and corresponding leases ie the other 2, by application under section 35 and 36, and/or by majority under s37 of the landlord and Tenant Act 1987.

      The grounds would be that the leases fail to make, in broad terms, satisfactory provision for repair of the building.

      http://www.lease-advice.org/publicat...asp?item=18#19
      Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

      Comment


      • #4
        Thank you for your help.

        I don't think section 35 will apply as we are a block of 3 flats. However section 37 may be helpful. If 2 out of the 3 leaseholders agree then we can make a majority application to the LVT include the one non-consenting lease. The Act doesn't seem to state that these leaseholders cannot also be freeholders.

        I think we may need to take legal advice on whether our grounds are reasonable and cost risks.

        Thank you again

        Zena

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by zena View Post
          Thank you for your help.

          I don't think section 35 will apply as we are a block of 3 flats. However section 37 may be helpful. If 2 out of the 3 leaseholders agree then we can make a majority application to the LVT include the one non-consenting lease. The Act doesn't seem to state that these leaseholders cannot also be freeholders.

          I think we may need to take legal advice on whether our grounds are reasonable and cost risks.

          Thank you again

          Zena

          Erm confused by the reply; you can apply as a leaseholder or freeholder(s). if you referring to the qualifier which from memory is 3 + flats, that refers to, eg, a head lease which contains 3 or more flats in one demise, not three flats with long leases and no intervening head lease.
          Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

          Comment

          Latest Activity

          Collapse

          • 'Administrative Fee' Request
            Doback
            Hi all,

            Recently Recieved the following letter from {Mod - name removed}.:


            ["We act as agents for {Mod - name removed} Limited.
            Our records indicate that the above property is being sublet/let or will be sublet/let shortly.

            Please complete and...
            27-07-2017, 17:27 PM
          • Reply to 'Administrative Fee' Request
            Doback
            leaseholder64 - There is no other clause in the lease relating to subletting.


            Gordon999- There's nothing about paying a fee in the lease, they are calling it an administrative charge in the letter. Thanks I'll ask for a letter, I'm sure they will have one. I agree they think every...
            29-07-2017, 09:35 AM
          • Leasehold Extension Cost - 59 years remaining, ground rent 70pa.
            Meiling
            Hi, I have currently offered to purchase a property at 440,000 with 59 years remaining on the lease (ground rent 70 pa) with envisaging to pay 45k to extend the lease for another 99 years. I am currently in mid-purchase when it has emerged that the current seller has served a Section 42 Notice with...
            28-07-2017, 20:34 PM
          • Reply to Leasehold Extension Cost - 59 years remaining, ground rent 70pa.
            MrSoffit
            Hi, as per statutory formula, if GR currently £70 for 59 years, using Savills graph suggests currently worth 82.9% of full value, so uplift value would be £535,585, but you need your surveyor and theirs to argue this out.

            I get a premium of about £61,500. Where did you get £45K? Your...
            28-07-2017, 21:43 PM
          • Lease extension
            chrisco
            Hi All, I have approached the freeholder on an informal basis to extend the lease of a flat I own as a rental. He has come up with reasonable price for the premium to extend to 125 years from now but wants to double the ground rent every 25 years (from £80 to £160 p/a initially). My solicitor has...
            27-07-2017, 23:59 PM
          • Reply to Lease extension
            Gordon999
            You should read the Guardian Newspaper ( 25/26 Jul )
            28-07-2017, 21:35 PM
          • FTT refuses permission to appeal but leaseholder still won't pay service charge
            Farrella
            First Tier Tribunal refuses permission to appeal their decision for the correct ("reasonable") service charge payable by leaseholder. But leaseholder still refuses to pay service charge and wants to go to court (or Upper Tribunal). Is the FTT useless at enforcing service charge payment?...
            26-07-2017, 16:11 PM
          • Reply to FTT refuses permission to appeal but leaseholder still won't pay service charge
            andydd
            No but it feasible that the ut overturns the FTT decision, it's not a reversal as such but higher courts overule lower ones it happens every day., he may not make a fool of himself. I appealed to the ut and whilst they didn't hear the case their response was very useful and opened up other avenues to...
            28-07-2017, 21:31 PM
          • Reply to FTT refuses permission to appeal but leaseholder still won't pay service charge
            andydd
            He is entitled to appeal directly the the upper tribunal I'm not sure if the case is then on hold until they reach a decision?, id assume so. The ut may simply turn it down, if so there is a procedure for FTT decisions to be enforced, although I can't recall it but it's similar to returning to high...
            28-07-2017, 21:28 PM
          • Reply to Leasehold Extension Cost - 59 years remaining, ground rent 70pa.
            Gordon999
            Your statutory right to lease extension is for 90 years giving a 149 years lease at peppercorn ground rent.(Nil) .
            28-07-2017, 21:26 PM
          Working...
          X