varying our leaseholder's lease

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    varying our leaseholder's lease

    Hello

    I am new to the forum, I hope you can help.

    We are a block of 3. The freehold is held by 2 of the flats (owner occupied). Our leaseholder rents out his flat and we have had a nightmare over the years getting him to contribute to works etc.

    We feel that we are being held to ransom by an absent leaseholder who is the minority in the building as he relies on the fact that we don't want to fight and would just like to live in peace. Its frustrating that he wants the benefit of us owner occupiers that want a nice home whilst he contributes very little.

    The problem is made worse by the fact that we have a poorly worded and vague lease. Issues are arising regarding the intercom system, health and safety issues e.g. installing emergency lighting.

    Our leaseholder will never agree to it but if 2 out of 3 leaseholders (both also being freeholders) agree ... can we apply to the LVT to vary the terms of all out leases to cover issues such as health and safety obligations etc that were never in the mind of lawyers drafting the original leases? what are the risks? and costs?
    Thank you for any assistance

    Zena

    #2
    I am afraid that you cannot change the lease terms along the lines you would like without the tenant's consent.

    "he relies on the fact that we don't want to fight and would just like to live in peace"

    You have to make a decision whether you let that go on.

    Comment


      #3
      But where they do no t agree you can resort to mediation arbitration or determination by the LVT.

      Where the leaseholder will not consent to a variation you may be able to vary the lease, and corresponding leases ie the other 2, by application under section 35 and 36, and/or by majority under s37 of the landlord and Tenant Act 1987.

      The grounds would be that the leases fail to make, in broad terms, satisfactory provision for repair of the building.

      http://www.lease-advice.org/publicat...asp?item=18#19
      Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

      Comment


        #4
        Thank you for your help.

        I don't think section 35 will apply as we are a block of 3 flats. However section 37 may be helpful. If 2 out of the 3 leaseholders agree then we can make a majority application to the LVT include the one non-consenting lease. The Act doesn't seem to state that these leaseholders cannot also be freeholders.

        I think we may need to take legal advice on whether our grounds are reasonable and cost risks.

        Thank you again

        Zena

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by zena View Post
          Thank you for your help.

          I don't think section 35 will apply as we are a block of 3 flats. However section 37 may be helpful. If 2 out of the 3 leaseholders agree then we can make a majority application to the LVT include the one non-consenting lease. The Act doesn't seem to state that these leaseholders cannot also be freeholders.

          I think we may need to take legal advice on whether our grounds are reasonable and cost risks.

          Thank you again

          Zena

          Erm confused by the reply; you can apply as a leaseholder or freeholder(s). if you referring to the qualifier which from memory is 3 + flats, that refers to, eg, a head lease which contains 3 or more flats in one demise, not three flats with long leases and no intervening head lease.
          Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

          Comment

          Latest Activity

          Collapse

          • Successful RTM claim
            skidder
            Hi all,

            I wonder if anybody can be of assistance.

            Cutting a long story short we have managed to obtain the RTM from a very aggressive freeholder. The right will transfer to us in August.

            It is a small block of four converted one bedroom flats

            We have...
            24-05-2018, 14:03 PM
          • Reply to Successful RTM claim
            skidder
            Thanks Leaseholder64 for the reply.

            Apologies for the confusion.

            I have received a renewal from the freeholder for insurance for the upcoming year. I shall pay this and the majority will be refunded in August when we handover.

            I shall then arrange my own policy...
            27-05-2018, 15:56 PM
          • Reply to Successful RTM claim
            leaseholder64
            I'm a bit confused because the first half says you are arranging the insurance and the second half says the freeholder is!

            Why would you think that he freeholder would not want to be name as having an interest in the insurance? (I would say it was essential they were named!)
            ...
            27-05-2018, 14:20 PM
          • Reply to Successful RTM claim
            skidder
            Hi Gordon999

            I have received a notice confirming RTM will commence in August. The freeholder states that the insurance will run out on this date and I will have to arrange. Policy is currently £1920 for four flats. I need to name the freeholder on my policy.

            Also can you confirm...
            27-05-2018, 10:38 AM
          • Reply to Successful RTM claim
            Gordon999
            Your RTM Is due to commence in August and will take over running the service account and maintenance of building. The RTM decides everything and freeholder is left with collecting the ground rent and dealing with forfeiture of lease (which is unlikely to happen ) .

            When does your current...
            27-05-2018, 10:21 AM
          • Reply to Successful RTM claim
            skidder
            Thanks Leaseholder64 much appreciated.

            So as above I do not need to go through another section 20. i.e. If all 3 leaseholders sit down and agree specs etc costing say £5k. We would all divide the amount correctly and sign papers saying monies paid and agreed etc. Would this be sufficient?...
            26-05-2018, 15:32 PM
          • Reply to Successful RTM claim
            leaseholder64
            Section 20 protects the leaseholders, not the freeholder. If the freeholder objected it would be because the proposed work was not sufficient to comply with the lease, not because of consultation issues.

            You should get a lot of information on handover. Even if the contractors are abandoned,...
            26-05-2018, 15:15 PM
          • Sub Letting Fees
            isthisnameavailable
            Another topic on this, sorry I can see there have been plenty.

            I have today received a letter from {Mod - name removed} on behalf on {Mod - name removed}. They are saying I have not replied to their letter dated May 19 2017 (I haven't) and things will be passed on to external solicitors...
            21-05-2018, 18:22 PM
          • Reply to Sub Letting Fees
            leaseholder64
            I think the organisation in question is not a managing agent. They make money purely from acting as an agent for the freeholder for ground rent and administration charges. i don't think they manage the property.

            I suspect you have to think long and talk to your MP as it looks like they...
            26-05-2018, 14:58 PM
          • Reply to Sub Letting Fees
            Gordon999
            What is your recommendation if the freehold was sold without Right of First Refusal offer to leaseholders and current freeholder is using a managing agent to demand extortionate subletting fees ?
            26-05-2018, 14:15 PM
          Working...
          X