varying our leaseholder's lease

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    varying our leaseholder's lease

    Hello

    I am new to the forum, I hope you can help.

    We are a block of 3. The freehold is held by 2 of the flats (owner occupied). Our leaseholder rents out his flat and we have had a nightmare over the years getting him to contribute to works etc.

    We feel that we are being held to ransom by an absent leaseholder who is the minority in the building as he relies on the fact that we don't want to fight and would just like to live in peace. Its frustrating that he wants the benefit of us owner occupiers that want a nice home whilst he contributes very little.

    The problem is made worse by the fact that we have a poorly worded and vague lease. Issues are arising regarding the intercom system, health and safety issues e.g. installing emergency lighting.

    Our leaseholder will never agree to it but if 2 out of 3 leaseholders (both also being freeholders) agree ... can we apply to the LVT to vary the terms of all out leases to cover issues such as health and safety obligations etc that were never in the mind of lawyers drafting the original leases? what are the risks? and costs?
    Thank you for any assistance

    Zena

    #2
    I am afraid that you cannot change the lease terms along the lines you would like without the tenant's consent.

    "he relies on the fact that we don't want to fight and would just like to live in peace"

    You have to make a decision whether you let that go on.

    Comment


      #3
      But where they do no t agree you can resort to mediation arbitration or determination by the LVT.

      Where the leaseholder will not consent to a variation you may be able to vary the lease, and corresponding leases ie the other 2, by application under section 35 and 36, and/or by majority under s37 of the landlord and Tenant Act 1987.

      The grounds would be that the leases fail to make, in broad terms, satisfactory provision for repair of the building.

      http://www.lease-advice.org/publicat...asp?item=18#19
      Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

      Comment


        #4
        Thank you for your help.

        I don't think section 35 will apply as we are a block of 3 flats. However section 37 may be helpful. If 2 out of the 3 leaseholders agree then we can make a majority application to the LVT include the one non-consenting lease. The Act doesn't seem to state that these leaseholders cannot also be freeholders.

        I think we may need to take legal advice on whether our grounds are reasonable and cost risks.

        Thank you again

        Zena

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by zena View Post
          Thank you for your help.

          I don't think section 35 will apply as we are a block of 3 flats. However section 37 may be helpful. If 2 out of the 3 leaseholders agree then we can make a majority application to the LVT include the one non-consenting lease. The Act doesn't seem to state that these leaseholders cannot also be freeholders.

          I think we may need to take legal advice on whether our grounds are reasonable and cost risks.

          Thank you again

          Zena

          Erm confused by the reply; you can apply as a leaseholder or freeholder(s). if you referring to the qualifier which from memory is 3 + flats, that refers to, eg, a head lease which contains 3 or more flats in one demise, not three flats with long leases and no intervening head lease.
          Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

          Comment

          Latest Activity

          Collapse

          • 1st Service Demand
            Seaes56
            I would like to send out a service charge demand to my neighbours. This is the first time they will have been asked to pay anything for about 30 years. This is a property I inherited which was in a bad state of repair. I am freeholder and the other leaseholder. My neighbours are quite set in their ways...
            19-07-2018, 19:57 PM
          • Reply to 1st Service Demand
            andydd
            Also some of the things you list sound like improvements as opposed to maintenence...
            21-07-2018, 09:40 AM
          • Reply to 1st Service Demand
            andydd
            Seems OK. .whether you can ask for work started but not completed depends on the wording of the leases (s) and whether or not you have incurred an actual costs..be aware that some older leases don't contain any provision for collecting monies in advance and that you must pay for everything and be reimbursed...
            21-07-2018, 09:38 AM
          • Leaseholder/freeholder relationships
            Emilycarter
            Hi

            Can a freeholder insist that a Leaseholder contacts the Managing Agent only with matters relating to the property?. We have a Leaseholder who insists on copying us into all communications, (via our personal email addresses and not the freeholder email address) and if the Managing...
            20-07-2018, 21:15 PM
          • Reply to Leaseholder/freeholder relationships
            andydd
            Good question. Ultimately the LH relationship is with you and I don't think there is anything you can do to prevent him contacting you.
            21-07-2018, 09:34 AM
          • Reply to Leaseholder/freeholder relationships
            leaseholder64
            I had trouble parsing the question. I wasn't sure if only referred to the managing agent, or only referred to the type of problem.

            In the former case, in this forum, AST tenants are often advised to bypass the letting agent, so I don't see why that should not also be true for the long...
            21-07-2018, 09:34 AM
          • Reply to Leaseholder/freeholder relationships
            fos333
            Hi,

            It would appear you want the rewards without the hassle, you have to ask yourself is your MA responding to reasonable requests and responding to leaseholders expecting to receive those replies in a timely manner, which as you already know is not correct or they wouldn't be contacting...
            21-07-2018, 02:08 AM
          • Have requested shareholder meeting and it is being continually declined
            Milly26
            Good evening All,

            I have tried to call a shareholder meeting with two directors since June. I am not a director and there are only three of us.
            The articles require a quorum of two so they are frustrating the meeting and quorum by not holding the meeting/attending.
            I thought...
            19-07-2018, 19:00 PM
          • Reply to Have requested shareholder meeting and it is being continually declined
            leaseholder64
            You can't win in a company law environment, as you would be out voted in a quorate meeting.

            Ignore the fact that you are member of the company and handle this under leasehold law, i.e. get an FTT ruling that the service charge is not reasonable/not payable.
            19-07-2018, 19:13 PM
          • Freeholder has no limited company - what are my options
            Robert Wilson
            Dear Fellow Property Hub Forum Member,



            I am in a bit of a pickle as I am in the process of selling my flat and during this, it has transpired that the landlord, who lives in the same house, has not set up a company to manage any service charges, repairs, etc. He always emailed...
            19-07-2018, 10:21 AM
          Working...
          X