When is a house not a house?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • When is a house not a house?

    I have given notice to my freeholder to enfranchise the freehold of my house. The response from the freeholder is it's not a house, so no you can't have it!

    The 'house' is a 3 bedroom, 3 storey town 'house' in a terrace of 5 with a block of flats at either end. There is no other property either above or below it...it's a 'house'! It was built and sold as such around 1990 in a joint development by the freeholder and a house builder. I even have the original sales brochure and price list for the 'houses'.

    The freeholder's argument is that there is undemised property above it, ie, the roof structure and therefore it's not a house. This roof structure is totally separate from all other roofs albeit in a terrace of buildings and only has access from my house. My water storage tanks were in this space until I upgraded the plumbing and removed them. This of course is also true of the foundations, external walls, party walls and window frames so I assume these too will negate freehold enfranchisement.

    So how do leaseholders of terraced houses actually gain their freehold?

    I know I will now have to get Counsel opinion and my solicitor is arranging this from the recognised expert in the field but what do you guys think?

    Is the freeholder talking out of proverbial? Is he really that stupid?

    All thoughts welcome, thanks.

  • #2
    As long as there is a clear vertical division and no cellars or projections which interfere with the grant of a freehold then it qualifies.

    In simple terms freehold implies from the centre of the earth to the top of the sky so a cellar or room that crosses it cuses emblems with granting a freehold.

    If they are refusing then have the matter determined at the LVT; counsels advice is not required, simply be represented by a local chartered surveyor that deals with house enfranchisement, who can give expert evidence for you.
    Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

    Comment


    • #3
      When is a house not a house?

      I would be very grateful if you could post the outcome to your question as I am in a similar situation. Many thanks

      Comment


      • #4
        Well, Counsel's opinion, and he's the acknowledged expert in the country, is that they are correct, it's a flat!

        That's the bad news, but the good news is that as it's a flat we can group together into 'blocks' of two or more units and go collective instead under the 1993 Act! So that is probably what we will do. Need to gather up a few neighbours now.

        Counsel's opinion was that the lease was (very carefully) worded so as not to demise all of the house, ie not the foundations, roof, walls, etc and all we lease is the space within. Hence, it's not a house but a 'flat' (even though it's 4 storeys from garage to roof space and solely vertically divided to boot!).

        Now I know the Law's an Ass!

        Comment


        • #5
          The definition of "house" in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 is based (as leaseholdanswers suggests) on the idea of "verticality" to ensure terraced houses were not excluded on the grounds that they were part of a building. Unfortunately the wording allows the Act to be circumvented by drafting such as the OP has.

          Gold star to the lawyer who drafted the lease.

          Black mark to the lawyer who approved it.

          Comment


          • #6
            It's interesting that over the years no solicitor has ever raised any issue with the lease. I say this because what we have all bought, and sold, has not been a 'house' even though they were advertised and bought as such many times!

            Doesn't say much for the quality of conveyancing lawyers does it?

            I suspect the original drafting of the leases was more to do with them all being the same and being primarily written for the adjacent blocks of 70 odd flats, the real ones that is!.

            Comment


            • #7
              We do not of course know what any particular conveyancer (apart from yours) may have advised. Not being able to enfranchise is not really a huge big deal. If you had been told would you have withdrawn? Even so, I agree it ought to have been spotted and pointed out. I am afraid that a lot of residential leasehold conveyancing does not get the attention it should have. At the firm I worked for last either we did the job properly and the client had to pay for it, or we did not do it. It is unfortunate that leases are often of the lower priced properties where clients are unwilling or unable to pay higher fees. Still, if something is missed and the client loses out financially, the conveyancer has to make good the loss whatever fee he charged.

              The fact that the terraced houses are part of a mixed development explains why the house leases were drawn up as they were. Enforcement of obligations becomes tricky if not backed by a lease.

              Comment

              Latest Activity

              Collapse

              • How to report a summary offence
                camera
                Hello,

                How do we report a summary offence?

                E.g. if we are not given a copy of our insurance policy after a proper demand and elapsed duration...

                E.g. if our landlord has locked the gas meter and prevented our access in an emergency..

                I'm referring...
                23-07-2017, 19:57 PM
              • How can I confirm if garages have been sold that once came with a flat?
                pernes
                Hi, I am trying to check what flats have sold their garages, to either other flats in the block who either didn't have one before or have purchased a second one or if someone outside the block now owns any.

                The block has three more flats than garages. Is there a way I can check this out?...
                22-07-2017, 21:07 PM
              • Reply to How can I confirm if garages have been sold that once came with a flat?
                pernes
                We do have a separate lease for the garage, both leases have the same title number. The garage lease has about 37 years remaining. So because they are on a different lease is that why vat is charged, because it is not a dwelling? We all have share of freehold so does that mean the garage leases can...
                23-07-2017, 19:44 PM
              • Reply to How can I confirm if garages have been sold that once came with a flat?
                leaseholder64
                What makes you think that they ever came with the flat? Having VAT on them makes me think they may be a on a completely different lease (and there will be a separate Land Registry entry.
                23-07-2017, 10:13 AM
              • Reply to How can I confirm if garages have been sold that once came with a flat?
                MrSoffit
                Hi, We have two dozen flats and only four garages. The garages are not owned by the flats numbered on the lease plans for those places. All leases include a car parking space in the demise, except the four with a garage who have this over-typed and the car space crossed out. Not even initialled as...
                22-07-2017, 22:52 PM
              • Reply to How can I confirm if garages have been sold that once came with a flat?
                theartfullodger
                Buy the deeds & plan of each flat from land registry
                22-07-2017, 21:50 PM
              • leaking roof in a leasehold flat
                bedruzenka
                Hello
                I own a leasehold flat and the roof has been leaking for almost 2 years now.My flat is on first floor of a converted end terrace Victorian house so there is another flat downstairs. According to my lease the freeholder is responsible for the roof but the leaseholders have to pay for it.The...
                22-07-2017, 07:14 AM
              • Reply to leaking roof in a leasehold flat
                leaseholder64
                An agent should be communicating any relevant information to their principal. If the freeholder gets into trouble because the agent doesn't tell them something, they should sue the agent!

                Section 7.8 of the RICS Code says the freeholder should be told immediately of any arrears.
                22-07-2017, 19:55 PM
              • Directors AND Officers of leasehold run companies?
                MrSoffit
                This forum often deals with the hassles of leaseholder run companies, the powers of the directors, and managing agents acting as company secretaries but dictating the show.

                There is another twist in the governance of leaseholder companies as imposed by managing agents and their associates....
                12-07-2017, 18:35 PM
              • Reply to Directors AND Officers of leasehold run companies?
                Auntym
                Thank you for your reply - much appreciated.
                22-07-2017, 15:33 PM
              Working...
              X