Repairs carried out by a leaseholder...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Repairs carried out by a leaseholder...

    We recently bought the freehold of a small residential block; the sellers were administrators/receivers of a failed company, who, needless to say allowed the premises to deteriorate and didnt bother insuring, or collecting any rent, or addressing any repair issues whatsoever.

    We have recently been out to tender to get the repairs organised and started to consult. One of the lessees has been in touch to say that prior to our involvement, he had some repairs carried out to the roof a section of which was leaking into his flat and is now hoping that we will collect contributions from the other lessees to reimburse him.

    We have every sympathy with the lessee concerned, and would like to do what we can to assist but don't think we can enforce payments from others in this circumstance. Does the panel agree?

    #2
    If the wording in the lease requires all flats to contribute to the roof repairs, then it is OK to charge the cost to the "building service charge account" and recover the share of cost from individual flats and to re-imburse the flat which arranged the repairs.
    But there is a time limit to comply -- the repair bill cannot go back more than 18 months as a valid expense under the service charge account.

    Comment


      #3
      repairs carried out on self help basis by lessee

      Originally posted by Gordon999 View Post
      If the wording in the lease requires all flats to contribute to the roof repairs, then it is OK to charge the cost to the "building service charge account" and recover the share of cost from individual flats and to re-imburse the flat which arranged the repairs.
      But there is a time limit to comply -- the repair bill cannot go back more than 18 months as a valid expense under the service charge account.

      GOOD POINT recoverable even if no s20 consultation took place? or would you say that the works were "urgent" and therefore no consultation was required to have taken place?

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by quarterday View Post
        GOOD POINT recoverable even if no s20 consultation took place? or would you say that the works were "urgent" and therefore no consultation was required to have taken place?
        Yes. He organised work to stop a clear breach of the building's fabric. That's urgent!
        JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
        1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
        2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
        3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
        4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

        Comment

        Latest Activity

        Collapse

        • Share of feehold/shared service charges?
          by Stu1020
          Hi there,

          I'm new to the forum and looking for advice on a sticky freehold situation.

          I own a two-bed flat in a converted building with two one-beds. The lease states that a fair proportion is payable towards the service charge. However, there has been a running agreement of...
          20-05-2022, 11:39 AM
        • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
          by Gordon999
          Since your flat has 2 bedrooms and other flats have one bedroom, you should keep the existing 38:31:31 split as fair contribution to the annual service charge account.

          For lease extension, the cost is mainly solicitors charges plus registration charge at Land Registry and Mortgage Lender.(...
          28-05-2022, 10:48 AM
        • Building works & S20 process
          by RichA
          Hi. I have a freehold after selling a leasehold flat in a block of 4 flats. We don't currently have a managing agent, so these duties currently fall to me (I am holding off appointing a managing agent whilst the leaseholders consider whether they want to RTM).

          The block needs some maintenance...
          21-05-2022, 17:20 PM
        • Reply to Building works & S20 process
          by Gordon999
          The S20 consultation with leaseholders is required for any planned works which exceed £250 cost per flat.

          If any planned works are quoted below £1000, you could place the order on the supplier with lowest quote. .

          If the freeholder is self- managing the building maintenance,...
          28-05-2022, 09:56 AM
        • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
          by sgclacy
          You appear to have bought into the flat knowing at the time your share is 38% and having owned the flat feel that this is unjust.

          Did you raise any concerns questions at the time of purchase that in a three flat split you would be paying more than 33.33% . Could it be argued that the unfairness...
          28-05-2022, 09:04 AM
        • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
          by eagle2
          The cost of extending a lease is not a service charge expense so there is no reason to allocate it on the 38/31/31 basis, your offer to split those costs equally seems to be reasonable. It is up to the freeholder to decide what is fair and reasonable for the service charges and it is up to the other...
          28-05-2022, 05:29 AM
        • Reply to Old managing agents accounts
          by eagle2
          Unless the handover took place at the end of the financial year, it is the RTM's responsibility to produce the annual accounts. You could try making a formal complaint against the agent to supply copies of all supporting documents, it should belong to a redress scheme. The difficulty is that the agent...
          28-05-2022, 05:05 AM
        • Old managing agents accounts
          by jazzythumper
          Since obtaining the RTM and changing the managing agent, we have never been given full accounts / receipts for the previous year(s). We believe that as the old freeholder and leaser holder of one of the flats were represented by the same solicitor that prior to the sale of the freehold, we were subsidising...
          20-05-2022, 11:21 AM
        • Freehold confusion
          by davetg
          30 years ago I bought a flat from a friend. The freehold at the time was registered to my friend and the lady who owned the other flat. I understood at the time that I would replace the friend on the freehold but this never happened. This was not a problem until now as when work on the structure of...
          24-05-2022, 14:29 PM
        • Reply to Freehold confusion
          by CStevens
          davetg,

          The property should be registered so the land registry should hold a copy of the leases. You would need to look at the leases to see who is responsible for what but normally in a maisonette situation the freeholder would insure and maintain the structure, foundation and roof with...
          27-05-2022, 21:58 PM
        Working...
        X