Can lessee split-up flat and garage?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Can lessee split-up flat and garage?

    I own a leasehold flat which has a supplmental lease attached for a garage
    I don't use the garage and want to sell it (it has it own land registry title)
    but have been told by the freeholder that I can't do this - even though there appears to be no restriction in the lease/s. Can he prevent me selling & how do I seperate the leases?

  • #2
    The answer to this problem probably lies in one or other of your leases. It would be normal to require permission from the freeholder to sell (transfer) the lease and certainly in the case of the flat it will say something like "such permission not to be unreasonably withheld". The garage is slightly different in that it would clearly be beneficial to the block in general to keep the garage for the use of someone who lives there (rather than it becoming Joe Bloggs round the corner's surplus auto spares store or the like...) and that may well be taken into consideration in the drafting of the relevant clause in the lease.

    Your best bet is to have a solicitor look at both leases and tell you whether a) there is any restriction on you selling the garage, and if so b) whether it is enforcable.

    Comment


    • #3
      Surely your flat and garage are worth more together. You should be thinking about future saleability.

      Few additional lateral thoughts:

      - Have you tried renting the garage to other lessees?
      - Have you tried renting the garage to the public (perhaps through an agent)?
      - Have you tried selling the lease to the freeholder?

      I think you're mad if you sell.

      Comment


      • #4
        Garage

        Thanks for the replies. I have read though the leases and it doesn't say that the garage can't be sold separately. The main problem I have is the freeloader- I mean freeholder with whom I have some 'history' I feel he is going out of his way to be obstructive – to the extent of having his solicitor send me letters threading legal action if I sell MY garage independently of my flat. I bought the garage a few months after my flat (in 1980) so it's not that they came together, the garage has its own title registered at the Land Registry, the problem is that the then freeholder granted a supplemental lease which seemed fine at the time. So my question remains – can a supplemental lease be separated from the main lease? Is there some form of arbitration or court proceeding where I can get the matter resolved?
        I take Poppy's view into account but there is lots of parking available in the complex and none of the other garages are used for parking – just storage, I have found a buyer who is also a leaseholder in an adjacent block and this is the course I'd like to follow.
        Thanks again.

        Comment


        • #5
          It would be impossible to answer your question since there is no general rule, all leases are different.

          Ask the freeholder's solicitor which clause in the lease he is relying on when he says you can't sell the garage separately, his answer may point you in the right direction. If not, you will need a solicitor to handle the transfer anyway so why not use their free 15 minutes or whatever they offer to ask them whether the sale is even possible.

          Comment


          • #6
            Garage

            Thanks for the reply. I know all leases are different but isn't this a more general question - can a lease and a supplemental lease be seperated - there is no reference to this point in either lease, does anyone have experience of doing this? The freeholders solicitors have refused to state what clause they are relying on - they just give the immpression that it goes without saying that lease and supplemental lease can't be seperated. My solicitor doesnt seem to want to stick his neck out on this one - so if anybody knows of a speacilist in this field I would be most grateful for that information. Cheers.

            Comment


            • #7
              Shall we look at it from a different angle

              Am I right in thinking that the garage lease was set up after the flat lease? Admittedly not terribly important.

              For whatever reason when the leases were created the freeholder decided that was the way they wanted to run things. My guess is that from an administrative point of view the freeholder wanted to deal with fewer lessees. (Say there are 6 flats and 6 garages. It is easier and cheaper to administer 6 lessees instead of 12.)

              Always rely on what the terms of the lease state. You say that neither lease specifies a way of separating the two. Only through mutual agreement between yourself and the freeholder can they be separated. I believe you already have that answer…

              Are you really going to pay another solicitor to give you the same answer as your current solicitor?

              Comment


              • #8
                Thanks for your response Poppy,
                The answer to your first question is Yes. There are far more flats than garages in the complex and one happened to come up for sale 2 months after I bought my flat - the obvious question there is how was it able to be sold -well long story but the then freeholder was the owner, so I was granted this supplemental lease which I suppose seemed easier at the time for the freeholder, as the garage leases is under the same terms as the main lease plus the extra terms in the supplemental lease. I can't believe the only way is through mutal agreement - one of us must be right in law. (The funny thing is that the person on the freehold company board who is causing the trouble wanted to buy my garage 3 years ago, we were quite friendly then, he offered £x and I knew it was worth £xx and when I would'nt sell to him for his price he got quite nasty and we have'nt spoken since - this is the 'history' I mentioned earlier)
                So yes I would pay another solicitor for the right advice - and before you say it - no I won't sell it to him now - on principle! (I don't need the money but it would be nice! )

                Comment

                Latest Activity

                Collapse

                • Excessive Communual repair works - New Landlord
                  samponsford.sp
                  Hi There,

                  I'm hoping you can help. First time posting but getting desperate. I'm a part owner of 3 flats out of 4 that are situated above a takeaway in a building. Recently we have a new landlord who has paid to have a fire safety check completed and also an assessment of the external...
                  21-08-2017, 12:26 PM
                • Ground rent rpi base
                  landforce
                  Hi.

                  Hopefully an easy question but does anyone know if when the ground rent is rpi linked is it from when the leasehold was set up or when you purchased the property. I.e if leasehold was set up in dec 12 but the property was purchased in Sept 13 is the base from dec12 or Sept 13?...
                  20-08-2017, 08:48 AM
                • Reply to Ground rent rpi base
                  landforce
                  Thanks for the above . V useful knowledge there
                  21-08-2017, 07:42 AM
                • Clarification on lease and recovering costs
                  jerome_sw
                  Please can someone clarify the meaning of this section of the lease;

                  "to indemnify the landlords against all costs charges and expenses (including legal costs and fees payable to any surveyor) which may be incurred or be borne by the landlords
                  (a) in or in contemplation of any...
                  20-08-2017, 11:45 AM
                • Reply to Clarification on lease and recovering costs
                  jerome_sw
                  We are due to attend the FTT on the breach of covenant so if they deem the breach to have occurred then I am thinking (b) could apply. In any event I think (c) would apply as the costs have been incurred in pursuing the leaseholder to remedy the breach and repair the property back to it's original state....
                  20-08-2017, 20:37 PM
                • Reply to Ground rent rpi base
                  sgclacy
                  The 1993 Act did not regard ground rents of little signicance - the full value had to be reflected in the valuation

                  by having a nil ground rent it was deigned to make it a complete formality for a lender to agree to the deed, originally it was intended that mortgagees consent would not...
                  20-08-2017, 15:31 PM
                • Reply to Clarification on lease and recovering costs
                  andydd
                  Yes generally accepting the lease as continuing (by demanding and accepting rent/services charges) means you have waived any right to forfeit and so any right to costs, Im really not sure what b) and c) mean, a|) is the standard clause in most leases, Im not sure b) or c) cover breach of a covenant...
                  20-08-2017, 14:16 PM
                • Reply to Ground rent rpi base
                  MrSoffit
                  "Two properties exactly the same one with a ground rent of a peppercorn and the other with a rent of £250 per annum will attract two differing sale prices. The one with a ground rent will clearly sell for less and the discount in the price is in effect a loan and the interest on that loan is in...
                  20-08-2017, 13:39 PM
                • Reply to Ground rent rpi base
                  sgclacy
                  Rents linked to the RPI protects both the landlord and the tenant. From the landlords perspective it protects the rent from the adverse effects of inflation and from the Tenants point of view protects them from the consequences of the estimate of future inflation being wrong. For example if inflation...
                  20-08-2017, 11:53 AM
                • Reply to Ground rent rpi base
                  MrSoffit
                  I ran some capitalisations assuming an original 99 year lease worth £100K when new with 79 years term left to run using the following variables:-

                  Increment rate (years): 15, 20, 25, 33
                  Method: RPI% @ 2.5%,3.5%,4.5% versus fixed doubling
                  Initial amounts: £100, £150, £200,...
                  20-08-2017, 11:08 AM
                Working...
                X