But going from:
Each parking space in the communal garage is allocated to a specific flat.
Nothing wrong with that, but without the tenants agreeing to change the lease the 'licence' could only be imposed on the new tenants when a flat is re-let.
Eventually all the flats would change hands and all garages would be covered by the additional 'licence'.
The new proposal to let a demised space to someone else if you are not using it for a car, and split that rent 50/50 with the landlord would be a change to that licence/lease.
So unless the licence has a clause about the landlord being able to vary the conditions the new poposal can't be imposed without the agreement of the individual flat owner concerned.
Basically it's saying - "Don't store stuff in the garage parking spaces they are only for parking - but if you don't have a car to park we can arrange for another tenant to park in your space for a fee, and we can both make a bit of money from that".
It seems sensible, they could have simply just gone by what the licence currently says ie. "no storage, cars only" and so those without a car would have to leave their space empty.
(Note that unless that 'licence' has a clause about no sub-letting then it may be possible to let your empty garage space yourself, and keep all the money, but it would be easier and safer to use their proposal and let them manage it).
Leave a comment: