Who owns loft space when it is not stated in lease.

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Who owns loft space when it is not stated in lease.

    Hi, I own a top floor maisonette and share the freehold 50/50 with the ground floor maisonette. I would like to build a loft conversion and after checking my lease I'm unsure who the loft space belongs to. All I can see in my lease is "the right for the lessor/owner/occupier of lower maisonette to maintain in the roof space of the demised premises such tanks or cisterns as are necessary for the provision of an adequate water system for the lower maisonette....". I've looked through the forums but everyone's lease is different I guess. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks

    It will depend on the precise wording within your lease.
    Lawcruncher is a forum member who seems to best know what he is talking about regarding this, and has previously said that, if the lease doesn't specifically exclude the loft space, and the loft can only be accessed from with a particular flat, legislation effectively means that the loft space is included in the demise of that flat even if the lease doesn't specifically include the loft (I hope I'm not getting this wrong, but hopefully Lawcruncher will see your post.

    However, whether or not you have any right to the loft space is not the only consideration if you wish to build a loft conversion. If you wish to include any sort of 'window' that will mean cutting through the roof, your lease may explicitly prohibit this.
    From what you have posted, the leases for your block definitely include the right for the lower maisonette to have the tanks/cisterns necessary to provide "an adequate water system" within the loft space, so whatever plans you have will have to allow for that.


      Please see this thread: https://forums.landlordzone.co.uk/fo...-in-the-lease=

      In your case the reservation of the right to maintain a tank in the loft is a clear indication of an intention to include the loft.


        I am curious.

        If the intention was to include the loft in the demise, then why would on the drafting of the lease would there be a right to maintain a tank in the loft. I would have thought that it implies there was no intention to include the loft in the demise



          The right is for the landlord and tenant below.


            Presumably all the flats have to have a tank in the loft, not just the flat below. So I really cannot see that provision for the tank enhances the case - it weakens it in a block of > 1 level.


              vagabond does ur lease state to whom has the roof been demised to? Who is responsible for insuring/repairing and rebuilding (in case of fire)?

              i am currently progressing a loft conversion application with the FH, and even though my lease does not specifically mention the loft space, since the roof is demised to me (I also have responsibility to insure it as part of my demise), by default it incorporates the loft space and airspace. I found case law that confirmed my position. Also this was not challenged by the FH.

              very rarely leases mention loft space (especially old ones). In this situation what is important to assess is to whom has the roof been demised to.

              hope this helps.


                If you and other flat owner are joint- owners of the freehold title for your building , you should be able to reach a deal where you can build in the loft and other leaseholder builds an extension on rear side of ground floor flat


                Latest Activity


                • Share of feehold/shared service charges?
                  by Stu1020
                  Hi there,

                  I'm new to the forum and looking for advice on a sticky freehold situation.

                  I own a two-bed flat in a converted building with two one-beds. The lease states that a fair proportion is payable towards the service charge. However, there has been a running agreement of...
                  20-05-2022, 11:39 AM
                • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
                  by Gordon999
                  Since your flat has 2 bedrooms and other flats have one bedroom, you should keep the existing 38:31:31 split as fair contribution to the annual service charge account.

                  For lease extension, the cost is mainly solicitors charges plus registration charge at Land Registry and Mortgage Lender.(...
                  28-05-2022, 10:48 AM
                • Reply to Building works & S20 process
                  by Gordon999
                  The S20 consultation with leaseholders is required for any planned works which exceed £250 cost per flat.

                  If any planned works are quoted below £1000, you could place the order on the supplier with lowest quote. .

                  If the freeholder is self- managing the building maintenance,...
                  28-05-2022, 09:56 AM
                • Building works & S20 process
                  by RichA
                  Hi. I have a freehold after selling a leasehold flat in a block of 4 flats. We don't currently have a managing agent, so these duties currently fall to me (I am holding off appointing a managing agent whilst the leaseholders consider whether they want to RTM).

                  The block needs some maintenance...
                  21-05-2022, 17:20 PM
                • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
                  by sgclacy
                  You appear to have bought into the flat knowing at the time your share is 38% and having owned the flat feel that this is unjust.

                  Did you raise any concerns questions at the time of purchase that in a three flat split you would be paying more than 33.33% . Could it be argued that the unfairness...
                  28-05-2022, 09:04 AM
                • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
                  by eagle2
                  The cost of extending a lease is not a service charge expense so there is no reason to allocate it on the 38/31/31 basis, your offer to split those costs equally seems to be reasonable. It is up to the freeholder to decide what is fair and reasonable for the service charges and it is up to the other...
                  28-05-2022, 05:29 AM
                • Reply to Old managing agents accounts
                  by eagle2
                  Unless the handover took place at the end of the financial year, it is the RTM's responsibility to produce the annual accounts. You could try making a formal complaint against the agent to supply copies of all supporting documents, it should belong to a redress scheme. The difficulty is that the agent...
                  28-05-2022, 05:05 AM
                • Old managing agents accounts
                  by jazzythumper
                  Since obtaining the RTM and changing the managing agent, we have never been given full accounts / receipts for the previous year(s). We believe that as the old freeholder and leaser holder of one of the flats were represented by the same solicitor that prior to the sale of the freehold, we were subsidising...
                  20-05-2022, 11:21 AM
                • Reply to Freehold confusion
                  by CStevens

                  The property should be registered so the land registry should hold a copy of the leases. You would need to look at the leases to see who is responsible for what but normally in a maisonette situation the freeholder would insure and maintain the structure, foundation and roof with...
                  27-05-2022, 21:58 PM
                • Freehold confusion
                  by davetg
                  30 years ago I bought a flat from a friend. The freehold at the time was registered to my friend and the lady who owned the other flat. I understood at the time that I would replace the friend on the freehold but this never happened. This was not a problem until now as when work on the structure of...
                  24-05-2022, 14:29 PM