Who owns loft space when it is not stated in lease.

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Who owns loft space when it is not stated in lease.

    Hi, I own a top floor maisonette and share the freehold 50/50 with the ground floor maisonette. I would like to build a loft conversion and after checking my lease I'm unsure who the loft space belongs to. All I can see in my lease is "the right for the lessor/owner/occupier of lower maisonette to maintain in the roof space of the demised premises such tanks or cisterns as are necessary for the provision of an adequate water system for the lower maisonette....". I've looked through the forums but everyone's lease is different I guess. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks

    It will depend on the precise wording within your lease.
    Lawcruncher is a forum member who seems to best know what he is talking about regarding this, and has previously said that, if the lease doesn't specifically exclude the loft space, and the loft can only be accessed from with a particular flat, legislation effectively means that the loft space is included in the demise of that flat even if the lease doesn't specifically include the loft (I hope I'm not getting this wrong, but hopefully Lawcruncher will see your post.

    However, whether or not you have any right to the loft space is not the only consideration if you wish to build a loft conversion. If you wish to include any sort of 'window' that will mean cutting through the roof, your lease may explicitly prohibit this.
    From what you have posted, the leases for your block definitely include the right for the lower maisonette to have the tanks/cisterns necessary to provide "an adequate water system" within the loft space, so whatever plans you have will have to allow for that.


      Please see this thread: https://forums.landlordzone.co.uk/fo...-in-the-lease=

      In your case the reservation of the right to maintain a tank in the loft is a clear indication of an intention to include the loft.


        I am curious.

        If the intention was to include the loft in the demise, then why would on the drafting of the lease would there be a right to maintain a tank in the loft. I would have thought that it implies there was no intention to include the loft in the demise



          The right is for the landlord and tenant below.


            Presumably all the flats have to have a tank in the loft, not just the flat below. So I really cannot see that provision for the tank enhances the case - it weakens it in a block of > 1 level.


              vagabond does ur lease state to whom has the roof been demised to? Who is responsible for insuring/repairing and rebuilding (in case of fire)?

              i am currently progressing a loft conversion application with the FH, and even though my lease does not specifically mention the loft space, since the roof is demised to me (I also have responsibility to insure it as part of my demise), by default it incorporates the loft space and airspace. I found case law that confirmed my position. Also this was not challenged by the FH.

              very rarely leases mention loft space (especially old ones). In this situation what is important to assess is to whom has the roof been demised to.

              hope this helps.


                If you and other flat owner are joint- owners of the freehold title for your building , you should be able to reach a deal where you can build in the loft and other leaseholder builds an extension on rear side of ground floor flat


                Latest Activity


                • on -going leaks
                  by finest1
                  Hi All,

                  The flat upstair has been leaking for some years. The ceiling soon partially collapsed stopping me fro m letting the flat. The leaseholder upstairs kept claiming that the leak was not coming from her flat despite sending them photos of her wet subfloor. I sent a letter claiming...
                  18-05-2022, 17:09 PM
                • Insurance
                  by jazzythumper
                  When the freehold of our building was sold, the old freeholder cancelled the buildings insurance which we had paid for in advance through our service charge.

                  A new policy was taken out by the new freeholder. A refund for the previous policy has been given to the previous freeholder but...
                  03-04-2022, 20:24 PM
                • Reply to Insurance
                  by jazzythumper
                  I’ve managed to get the refund from the previous insurers, which is good, over £1,000 that we wouldn’t have had otherwise in our funds.
                  18-05-2022, 15:51 PM
                • Breaches of Model Articles
                  by Starlane
                  ram Our articles require a quorum for board and for shareholder meetings. It has come to light after the event that a director has called a meeting on their own and appointed another director, the meeting was inquorate and no members were made aware that this was going on, additionally no meeting has...
                  06-05-2022, 16:02 PM
                • Reply to Breaches of Model Articles
                  by Starlane
                  The Articles require a quorum for the board and shareholders, one of the directors sold their flat...I was not aware and find out months later that the director has been acting on their own then a new shareholder came onboard and again did not know that he had been appointed a director.They wont call...
                  18-05-2022, 15:38 PM
                • Section 20 notice of planned works not disclosed by vendor
                  by Lexa
                  Hi all

                  I purchased a flat last August and asked my solicitor specifically to check if any section 20 notices for planned works have been served. Their report dated 31/07/21 states no and so does the Leasehold Management Pack issued by the Manco dated 8 June 2021. I now received a letter...
                  05-05-2022, 12:56 PM
                • Reply to Section 20 notice of planned works not disclosed by vendor
                  by Lexa
                  @sglacy - The works the notice has been served for are part of a cyclical decoration programme on the wider estate and there was no way to foresee any works being planned without being made aware of the notices or plans of works. It might have been evident to the vendor but not to me. The point is...
                  18-05-2022, 13:20 PM
                • Neighbour Dispute over Bins
                  by Tony-Edwards

                  I could do with some guidance if anyone has any knowledge on this.

                  I have a 100 year old flat that was split from a larger building in 2000 and has a 999 year lease, it is next door to a commercial premises.

                  The only way to get to my flat is across their...
                  17-05-2022, 14:40 PM
                • Reply to Neighbour Dispute over Bins
                  by Tony-Edwards
                  The Lease..........

                  (20.05.1997) By a Conveyance of the land in this title and other land dated 15 July 1977 made between (1) xxx (Vendor) and (2) xxxx (Purchaser) the land was conveyed subject as follows:-

                  Subject to all existing rights and privileges in the nature of easements...
                  18-05-2022, 09:18 AM
                • Reply to Neighbour Dispute over Bins
                  by royw
                  Can't you leave them on the road for collection?
                  18-05-2022, 08:43 AM