Macromia,
Thank you for all your help I do appreciate all your different perspectives and wisdom
Service charges Interim payment clarification
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by AndrewDod View Post
RICS can't and does not dictate the use or purpose of a reserve fund or the way this is computed beyond what the lease says.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
You are entitled to know what the fund is to be used for and how it has been calculated otherwise you do not know if it is reasonable or not. I would be tempted to suspend payment until you receive a reply and an explanation when the redecoration is to be carried out. That should prompt a response.
Leave a comment:
-
So if none of the monies have been used for the purpose of the sinking fund then would this be a breach of trust? And despite repeatedly asking what is the purpose, what are the monies for, please provide me with a statement of the account balance, are the monies held in an interest bearing account and how are they protected? I get BLANK response!
Leave a comment:
-
AndrewDod this is what our sinking fund can be used for..it does state decorating!- To set aside ( which setting aside shall for the purpose of the Sixth Schedule be deemed an item of expenditure incurred by the Lessor) such sums of money as the Lessors reasonably require to incur in replacing maintaining renewing and decorating those items which the lessor hereby covenants to replace maintain renew or decorate ( such sums set aside to be a sinking fund)
Leave a comment:
-
RICS can't and does not dictate the use or purpose of a reserve fund or the way this is computed beyond what the lease says.
Leave a comment:
-
The RICS management code 7.5 states that "the intention of a reserve fund is to spread the costs of "use and occupation" as evenly as possible throughout the life of the lease to prevent penalising leaseholders who happen to be in occupation at a particular moment when major expenditure occurs".
It adds that "it is ... good practice to hold reserve funds where the leases permit. If the lease says the landlord "must" set up a fund, then this must be done,... No attempt to collect funds for a reserve fund should be made when the lease does not permit it".
Leave a comment:
-
At least half the leases I have seen state specifically that this is not what the reserve fund is for. So it depends, I agree
Leave a comment:
-
I always use reserve funds for cyclical expenditure, decorating etc. It helps leaseholders budget for major items .
If the roof "blew off" , you would hope it would be an insurance matter.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Starlane,
The name is irrelevant. The lease (if it permits a reserve fund) will state what it is for. They don't have to tell you what it is for beyond that except in broad terms unless the lease says they do. In general sinking funds are there for things that only happen in a blue moon (every 20 years the roof blows off) - in general (depends on the lease) the purpose is not to pay for anticipated cyclic expenditure like "maintenance/only service provided insurance and no decoration for 7 years"
Leave a comment:
-
Interim charges should be defined within your lease but I agree with macromia that it usually means any charges payable on account and before the actual expenditure is known. What does your lease say about receiving an annual certificate showing the actual expenditure for the year and adjusting the interim charges to the actual amount payable? You should be credited if your share of the actual expenditure is less than the charges on account, although some leases state that any excess may be added to the reserve fund..
Leave a comment:
-
Starlane,
You can ask how they have calculated the reserve/sinking fund contribution. If it is calculated correctly, the amount should not vary substantially from year to year because the object of a reserve fund is to even out the costs over the life of the lease. You are also entitled to know how much is held in the reserve fund at the end of each year and you should be provided with a summary of the movements in that fund. Challenging the reserve fund contributions is another matter, it is extremely difficult to convince a tribunal that the contributions are unreasonable.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Starlane View PostI would like to ask for your help and guidance - what is your definition of an interim payment?
Originally posted by Starlane View Post- The Lessee shall pay to the Lessor or managing agents as the case may be the Lessee’s proportion of:
- In advance in each year the amount which shall be reasonably estimated by the manging agents or the Lessor as the case may be of the Service Charge for the year
- Any further sums as shall be required by way of an interim charge during the course of the year
It also allows them to make additional demands as interim charges if they decide that previous demands they have made are not sufficient to cover all costs.
Originally posted by Starlane View PostIn my view the landlord has not complied with the lease the service charges are required to be paid quarterly according to the lease so I have told the landlord that the May demand is invalid
Can you shed any advice on the above and any case law as I don’t accept that I should be asked to pay out large sums of money in one go and don’t know what the monies are for or being spent on?
There is nothing in UK law that prevents leaseholders from having to pay out large sums of money - the only requirements are that the money is for costs that the lease makes payable by leaseholders and that the costs are reasonable. Hypothetically, section 20 consultation requirements also apply, but these can be avoided in most cases and don't necessarily have to be carried out before costs can be demanded.
Originally posted by Starlane View PostThe paragraph not in my lease clause reads "that the lessor shall be liable to pay " any further sums as shall be required by way of an interim charge during the course of the year"....but I am NOT the LESSOR I am the lessee?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by eagle2 View Post
You can argue whether or not the charge is reasonable but it is difficult to argue that a reserve fund contribution is unreasonable.
Leave a comment:
Latest Activity
Collapse
-
by hhyHi all,
I live in a flat with a leasehold for 125 years. It has a conventional boiler and a hot water cylinder but I decided to replace them with a combi boiler.
The only clause in the lease related to alteration says:
"NOT to make any structural alterati...-
Channel: Long Leasehold Questions
30-06-2022, 21:39 PM -
-
by AndrewDodThe freeholder (whether via an agent or otherwise) can only charge what the lease says they can charge, not what their website says they can do. These are crooks pure and simple (of the common freeholder type - so not unusual to find crooks in this sector - they need to be driven out)....
-
Channel: Long Leasehold Questions
01-07-2022, 16:14 PM -
-
by LawcruncherWhat does the tenant's repair clause cover?
-
Channel: Long Leasehold Questions
01-07-2022, 15:23 PM -
-
by LawcruncherJust write back and say thank you for your letter, please let me have your client's solicitors' details. Say nothing else.
-
Channel: Long Leasehold Questions
01-07-2022, 14:39 PM -
-
by fc1892Hi,
I have read a number of threads about challenging the underletting fee and have gathered a lot of useful information from this and other forums which I will now use to respond to the MA who has written to me on behalf of the FH. I do have some specific questions regarding the wording...-
Channel: Long Leasehold Questions
01-06-2022, 16:25 PM -
-
by fc1892I have received a response from the Freeholders Agent to my request for them to advise who the Freeholders Solicitor is as that is who I shall be advising of any under-letting arrangement, in accordance with my lease. They write.
Please be advised that we act on behalf of the Freeholder/Lessor...-
Channel: Long Leasehold Questions
01-07-2022, 13:16 PM -
-
by Gordon999There is no clause "requiring leaseholders to pay a non-refundable fee" in your lease and therefore the charge of £110 fee is not valid under the lease.
-
Channel: Long Leasehold Questions
01-07-2022, 12:42 PM -
-
by hhyWow, never thought that the £110 can be claimed back! No, there's nothing about boiler in the lease. They are just trying to fool me by saying all improvements are considered to be alterations.
However I am OK with them taking the £110 TBH as long as they don't try to blackmail me. I do...-
Channel: Long Leasehold Questions
01-07-2022, 10:43 AM -
-
by Gordon999If the wording in your lease does not state "freeholder consent" is required to replace the gas boiler, then you should demand the £110 admin fee be refunded.
If it is refused , then enter a claim for £110 + court fee to the small claims court online.-
Channel: Long Leasehold Questions
01-07-2022, 09:31 AM -
-
by eagle2You are right to insist that the directors comply with the Articles, they cannot possibly go through that procedure each time there is a change of membership.
I am not surprised that the service charges have been increased, it is probably due to legal fees, which they seem to be incurring...-
Channel: Long Leasehold Questions
01-07-2022, 07:13 AM -
Leave a comment: