Advice please director acting on their own

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Advice please director acting on their own

    Hi, after some advice on dealing with a situation. One of our directors took it upon himself to take a letter asking owners to vote on a company for works the company is his,and he actually wrote the letter from his company , but more importantly he did this without the knowledge of agreement of the other directors.
    We had agreed at our last meeting to a standard of work and we would look at the quotes we had and then decide on the company at our next meeting. I believe what they have done is so wrong and has now caused more confusion with the owners

    How would you deal with this ?

    #2
    Work with others to remove him from his position?
    My views are my own - you may not agree with them. I tend say things as I see them and I don't do "political correctness". Just because we may not agree you can still buy me a pint lol

    Comment


      #3
      Agreed. Remove him asap following correct procedure. It was blatant abuse of his position.

      Comment


        #4
        Any director can, should be, and will be prevented from discussing and even voting on the matter if he/she has links with the firms quoting.

        Shareholders don't vote on who they should employ ( though it happens sometimes )
        The leaseholders / shareholders are asked as to their preference, and asked to suggest alternative firms that should be contacted to obtain quotes from.

        THe DIRECTORS -- all of them, make the final decisions.

        Your other directors must write to ALL leaseholders and inform them that it is regulated that any director that has personal connections with firms that are quoting, --- That director is excluded from all discussions, and banned from even voting on the subject.

        Type it out now, but hand deliver the offending directors letter first.

        I can't find the info at the moment- as had 2 computers crash recently

        Comment


          #5
          The other directors should give the director a warning. Whether or not voting is permitted when there is a conflict of interests depends on the Articles, but good practice would require the director to abstain even if he is permitted to vote. If the director continues to fail to act according to the decisions made by the board of directors, the directors should call a meeting of members and ask the members to vote on whether or not the director should remain in office.

          Comment


            #6
            Trouble is, leaseholders are appathetic.
            Oh, he's such a nice man, this Director, lets keep him and forgive him

            Happend here.

            Board of directors can dismiss a director, so long as they have it ratified by the members shortly afterwards.
            ( E.G. Director steals money, had the bank account details - so - No, he gets removed instantly, and not wait 3 weeks before you get the "nod" from the members )

            Comment


              #7
              The directors do not have the power to remove another director, they are answerable to the members and only the members can remove a director, If the members do not vote him out, he remains a director regardless of what the other directors think, If a director steals money, it is theft and you report it to the police.

              Comment


                #8
                Ram our articles allow a director with a conflict of interest to vote sadly ,though good practise would say not too.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Eagle 2..what if said directors appointment has not yet been ractified by members ?

                  Comment


                    #10
                    It makes no difference if the director's appointment has not been ratified by the members, he is a director as long as he has was properly appointed in accordance with the Articles (presumably by the other directors) and only the members may remove him as a director.

                    Comment

                    Latest Activity

                    Collapse

                    • Reply to Freeholder/Agent Demanding Money for Repairs
                      by eagle2
                      It makes you wonder why any freeholder should comply with s20 at all. As you say, it can wait to see if any leaseholder challenges the costs. It does not even need to explain why it did not comply with s20, the only consideration appears to be whether or not the leaseholders suffered any financial prejudice,...
                      23-10-2021, 06:34 AM
                    • Freeholder/Agent Demanding Money for Repairs
                      by SSLA91
                      Hi all,

                      Long time lurker of this forum and recent new member. Have always found the forum incredibly helpful so thank you! Have now got an issue with our freeholder that I could use some specific advice on (have tried searching for similar posts but to no avail).

                      We have recently...
                      20-10-2021, 20:28 PM
                    • Section 20 notice
                      by Starlane
                      Hello I would welcome input on the following:
                      Two roofs feed into a valley, the valley is in need of repair, this is a shared responsibility and therefore a shared cost. so how do we issue a section 20 notice when really we need the consent and agreement from two different buildings/landlords...
                      22-10-2021, 19:09 PM
                    • Reply to Section 20 notice
                      by Starlane
                      Hi Macromia thank you as always for your helpful and sensible input.. one building is saying one thing and another building the other, the usual chinese whispers so I took the bull by the horns and spoke to everyone and I am almost there apart from a Director who wants to do their own thing ( not being...
                      22-10-2021, 20:57 PM
                    • Share of freehold questions - confused
                      by sixunforced
                      Not sure if this is the right place for this query but anyway, I'm a first time buyer and have been searching for a property for like two years now (not continuously but on and off and obv covid halted my search for a while). I found a really nice 2 bedroom flat for under £320,000 in a block of around...
                      18-11-2020, 21:19 PM
                    • Reply to Share of freehold questions - confused
                      by Starlane
                      Agree thank you...
                      22-10-2021, 20:52 PM
                    • Reply to Section 20 notice
                      by Macromia
                      Assuming that the two freeholders have agreed that they will work together and share the costs, they jointly agree what needs to be communicated to the leaseholders and then each freeholder writes to the leaseholders in their building.
                      22-10-2021, 20:16 PM
                    • Freeholder threatening to cut water off
                      by Disraeli-LLH
                      I was hoping you would be able to help. We own a ground floor flat LLH(970 yrs remaining). The freeholder owns the house and lets the flat upstairs on an AST.

                      The freeholder currently undertaking works including replumbing. We have been on a shared water supply and we connect through their...
                      20-10-2021, 15:35 PM
                    • Reply to Freeholder threatening to cut water off
                      by Macromia
                      This is possibly by far the most important consideration, in my opinion.
                      If the OP's lease doesn't allow 'improvements' to be charged to service charges, the freeholder cannot require them to contribute anything towards the costs, and would therefore be something that they would have had no choice...
                      22-10-2021, 20:08 PM
                    • Reply to Freeholder/Agent Demanding Money for Repairs
                      by Macromia
                      Possibly...

                      Although when my freeholder applied for dispensation a while back (arguing that the proposed work had to be carried out as a matter of urgency) they were granted dispensation with the First Tier Tribunal commenting that the 2013 Supreme Court Case of Daejan versus Benson meant...
                      22-10-2021, 19:51 PM
                    Working...
                    X