Who pays for incoming cable?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Who pays for incoming cable?

    I believed that the network co had to pay for cabling up to meter but some of them want to shift costs to the freeholder in flats and just go as far as the cellar.
    that makes electric supply even more complex. From three to four different electrical teams to get supply on and all trying to pass the buck.1 dno 2 freeholder,3 billing co,4 leaseholder.

    Why is there not existing cable from meter area to the flats.

    You need to explain more -- ultimately leaseholders pay for all costs whether directly or indirectly via FH.

    How did this arise, does it involve all flats?


      Ditto to the above response

      need much more info


        The ecisting cable was overheating and the dno was trying to pass the buck.


          Still not enough detail to say anything intelligible in response. What cable? Why? All flats? Who installed it? etc....


            Which cable?

            the incoming ?
            From the head to meter?
            from the meter to the switch fuse?
            From the switch fuse to the flat?


              I am unsure of the terms but i mean the cable from the cellar to the meter in the flat.


                It is the supplier's cable. You cannot touch it. Who is responsible for paying however depends on all the other stuff that is unanswered.

                Is it a private meter?

                There are also secondary costs (for example even if actually replacing the wire might be "DNO" responsibility that does not mean they pay for conduits to be opened, accessed, redecorated, if someone damaged the cable or misused the supply....).


                  Tha nks for the reply. Each flat has its own meter with their choice of supplier. The dno has now done repairs on the flat end of the cable so I presume they are taking on the buildin g network. I just suspect they will try and get us to pay if it gets expensive like replacing a big switch on a threephase supply in the cellar of the block.


                  Latest Activity


                  • Reply to Section 61 and my Landlords rights for an order of possesion
                    by andyg1
                    In consideration of the sum of Nine Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds (£9750 ) receipt of which the Lessor herby acknowledges The Lessor with limited title guarantee demised to the Lessee the Premises To Hold the Premises to the Lessee for a term of 172 years from 25th March 1978 Together With...
                    21-01-2022, 12:35 PM
                  • Section 61 and my Landlords rights for an order of possesion
                    by andyg1
                    Hi All

                    I wonder if anyone can set my mind to rest, i am the leaseholder of the flat in question . In 2008 i employed a firm of solicitors to extend my Lease . It was a 99 year lease granted in 1978 and it was eventually extended for an additional 90 years . During negotiations...
                    20-01-2022, 16:35 PM
                  • Reply to Why would managing agent use S20 dispensation?
                    by eagle2
                    The reason should have been explained to you when the application was made and you should have had the opportunity to challenge the application. The Tribunal would have considered if there was any prejudice to the leaseholders and should have made any appropriate comments within its decision.
                    21-01-2022, 06:21 AM
                  • Why would managing agent use S20 dispensation?
                    by Flashback1966
                    Have a flat in a block. The communal area is in very poor condition. Lighting not working for 15 years. Carpets worn out and threadbare. You can see the floorboard in places. Electrical cupboard door falling off.... Some residents leaving furniture in hallway.

                    The managing agents applied...
                    20-01-2022, 20:50 PM
                  • Reply to Are stopcocks responsibility of Lessee or Lessor
                    by nukecad
                    You have a point, most of the cost for a small job like that is the plumbers call out charge, so it makes sense to only have the one call out.

                    If it's just seized up then there are things you can try, it may sound odd but one of them is tightening the top nut and then slackening it again....
                    21-01-2022, 05:59 AM
                  • Are stopcocks responsibility of Lessee or Lessor
                    by NaomiB
                    Our flats were built in 1962. Some of the stopcocks are now seized up. Originally, the water came into the building and there was a stopcock for each flat in the cupboard in the communal area. It may confuse things a bit now because we have water meters for each flat outside. However, I wanted to...
                    17-01-2022, 08:44 AM
                  • Reply to Are stopcocks responsibility of Lessee or Lessor
                    by NaomiB
                    It does make a difference if I have to pay, say, £130 for just my one whereas all nine could be done for not a lot more. I've passed it over to the residents' association to decide whether they want to go ahead or not. I'll spray mine with WD40 tomorrow!...
                    20-01-2022, 23:27 PM
                  • Reply to Are stopcocks responsibility of Lessee or Lessor
                    by Flashback1966
                    Whether it is paid out of service charge or by individual flat owner, it still comes out the same pocket!.

                    However, given that you plan to sell you flat, the last thing you want is an uncontrolled water leak damaging your flat.

                    it is better to get a job done at once. ...
                    20-01-2022, 21:05 PM
                  • Isn't there any obligation to be insured?
                    by Sarah17
                    Hi All,
                    I recently bought a flat and learned since that the flat above is a regulated tenancy. The current tenant has moved in 1972. The flat is in a very shabby state, and I am worried about it (safety concerns, fire risk...etc). I wrote to the landlord and didn't receive any answer yet. A few...
                    16-01-2022, 17:57 PM
                  • Reply to Isn't there any obligation to be insured?
                    by Flashback1966
                    If there is a leak from the flat above, then you need to claim on your insurance. I know it sounds unfair, but that is how it works. The upper flat is responsible for fixing the leak. Ideally the entire building should be under one insurance policy, but sometimes, people insure separately....
                    20-01-2022, 20:33 PM