Ground rent deed of variation - which deal is best?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Ground rent deed of variation - which deal is best?

    We are selling a flat with over 100 years left on the lease. The ground rent is £200 pa, doubling every 20 years throughout the term. It is next due to double in 2035. The buyer's solicitor insists that we get the lease varied because the buyer's mortgage lender won't lend against the current ground rent provisions. Our freeholder has offered two deed of variation options:

    1. A premium of 2.5K, plus legal costs of c. £750.00 to enter a deed of variation stating that the freeholder won't rely on Housing Act 1988 for repossession

    OR

    2. A premium of 2.5K, plus legal costs of c. £750.00 to enter into a deed of variation stating that the doubling occurs every 25 years throughout the term instead of every 20 years.

    Which deal is best?
    Does 2.5K, plus legal costs of c. £750.00 sound excessive?

    #2
    Or....a leasehold indemnity policy at £34.00

    If you search online for Guaranteed Conveyancing solutions you will find a specialist site that offers indemnity policies. Go to quick quote and


    select "forfeiture of lease Housing Act repossession"

    limit of indemnity being the amount of the mortgage

    and at £250k the premium is £34

    Therefore, what this tells us is that if an insurance company (who will clearly understand the risks) decide the premium for such a risk is £34.00 then there really is nothing to worry about

    If they won’t accept the policy then I think option 1 is the answer

    Comment


      #3
      Our freeholder didn't charge a premium, just had to pay their legal fees. But 1 is probably the better option. There are mortgage lenders who will offer on 20 years gr doubling. There is a table of lenders somewhere on the net with their lending criteria.

      Comment


        #4
        sgclacy,

        We didn't think there was an issue with 20 year doublers so we too suggested an indemnity policy but the buyer's solicitor insisted that this would not be good enough as it only provides indemnity for the lender - not the borrower. The buyer's solicitor said that any equity and/or deposit the borrower has in the flat would not be protected. That's why the buyer's solicitor is insisting on getting a deed of variation...

        Comment


          #5
          Jon66,

          I agree that option 1 seems a better solution as option 2 still has the Housing Act 1988 to contend with. I wasn't sure whether I was missing something though?

          You are lucky that your freeholder didn't charge a premium but ours is insisting on charging one - pointing out the fact that they are not compelled to enter into a deed of variation in the first place! This is what made me wonder whether a premium of 2.5K, plus costs was excessive. Let's face it - if the freeholder is not compelled to enter into a deed of variation - what would prevent the freeholder charging us 50K, plus costs for the deed of variation - knowing that if we refuse to pay then we are likely to lose this buyer and all other buyers using the same lender?

          Comment


            #6
            Duh, 2 is far and away the better option as you will be paying considerably less ground rent over the term.
            And all your buyer has to do is pay the ground rent and avoid forfeiture/loss of equity/ deposit.
            It's a red herring and ruse for lawyers to make more money. Repossession under the act for ground rent has never happened.

            Comment


              #7
              Section20z,

              With the premium at £34 the risk must be effectively zero

              Comment


                #8
                Section20z,

                If we were keeping the flat, we would choose option 2. However we are selling the flat and the buyer's lender categorically won't lend with the ground rent provisions as they are. The sale is at a pretty advanced stage already and needs to complete by end of September 2021 to take advantage of the stamp duty holiday. Neither the buyer nor the buyer's solicitor seem willing to switch lenders at this late stage.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Hello I am desperate for some advice. I too am in the same situation as Lorimer. I sold my flat last July 2020 and had to get a deed of variation sorted at the insistence of buyers solicitor whereby the rent will increase with Retail Index Price. This took well over 5 months to get the Landlord to agree to and activate at a cost of £1500 including my solicitors charge. because it took so long my buyer pulled out. I was lucky to quickly get another buyer but after 12 weeks the new buyers solicitor is wanting a further clause added to the deed of variation stating that 'the freeholder won't rely on Housing Act 1988 for repossession' This was put to the management company back in July 2021 and so far have received no response despite my solicitor trying to chase. Is it usual for a buyers solicitor to want both clauses? I will point out my buyer is a cash buyer and not relying on a mortgage. I am in a stale mate situation and cannot afford further costs or the length of time to get sorted even if the management company agree. I am having to pay 2 mortgages as I now live in a different area and cannot sustain this. My solicitor is offering no solutions of

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Yes it's normal because even the gr going up with rpi is still a problem, mine is 12 years old and goes up with rpi and now it's 259 a year, no one can get a mortgage lender to agree with that amount as it's above 250.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Why don’t u trigger section 42 (lease extension) to get rid of the GR once for all???

                      u can start the process then pass on the benefit to the buyer on completion. That should resolve the issue.

                      Comment

                      Latest Activity

                      Collapse

                      • Share of feehold/shared service charges?
                        by Stu1020
                        Hi there,

                        I'm new to the forum and looking for advice on a sticky freehold situation.

                        I own a two-bed flat in a converted building with two one-beds. The lease states that a fair proportion is payable towards the service charge. However, there has been a running agreement of...
                        20-05-2022, 11:39 AM
                      • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
                        by Gordon999
                        Since your flat has 2 bedrooms and other flats have one bedroom, you should keep the existing 38:31:31 split as fair contribution to the annual service charge account.

                        For lease extension, the cost is mainly solicitors charges plus registration charge at Land Registry and Mortgage Lender.(...
                        28-05-2022, 10:48 AM
                      • Reply to Building works & S20 process
                        by Gordon999
                        The S20 consultation with leaseholders is required for any planned works which exceed £250 cost per flat.

                        If any planned works are quoted below £1000, you could place the order on the supplier with lowest quote. .

                        If the freeholder is self- managing the building maintenance,...
                        28-05-2022, 09:56 AM
                      • Building works & S20 process
                        by RichA
                        Hi. I have a freehold after selling a leasehold flat in a block of 4 flats. We don't currently have a managing agent, so these duties currently fall to me (I am holding off appointing a managing agent whilst the leaseholders consider whether they want to RTM).

                        The block needs some maintenance...
                        21-05-2022, 17:20 PM
                      • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
                        by sgclacy
                        You appear to have bought into the flat knowing at the time your share is 38% and having owned the flat feel that this is unjust.

                        Did you raise any concerns questions at the time of purchase that in a three flat split you would be paying more than 33.33% . Could it be argued that the unfairness...
                        28-05-2022, 09:04 AM
                      • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
                        by eagle2
                        The cost of extending a lease is not a service charge expense so there is no reason to allocate it on the 38/31/31 basis, your offer to split those costs equally seems to be reasonable. It is up to the freeholder to decide what is fair and reasonable for the service charges and it is up to the other...
                        28-05-2022, 05:29 AM
                      • Reply to Old managing agents accounts
                        by eagle2
                        Unless the handover took place at the end of the financial year, it is the RTM's responsibility to produce the annual accounts. You could try making a formal complaint against the agent to supply copies of all supporting documents, it should belong to a redress scheme. The difficulty is that the agent...
                        28-05-2022, 05:05 AM
                      • Old managing agents accounts
                        by jazzythumper
                        Since obtaining the RTM and changing the managing agent, we have never been given full accounts / receipts for the previous year(s). We believe that as the old freeholder and leaser holder of one of the flats were represented by the same solicitor that prior to the sale of the freehold, we were subsidising...
                        20-05-2022, 11:21 AM
                      • Freehold confusion
                        by davetg
                        30 years ago I bought a flat from a friend. The freehold at the time was registered to my friend and the lady who owned the other flat. I understood at the time that I would replace the friend on the freehold but this never happened. This was not a problem until now as when work on the structure of...
                        24-05-2022, 14:29 PM
                      • Reply to Freehold confusion
                        by CStevens
                        davetg,

                        The property should be registered so the land registry should hold a copy of the leases. You would need to look at the leases to see who is responsible for what but normally in a maisonette situation the freeholder would insure and maintain the structure, foundation and roof with...
                        27-05-2022, 21:58 PM
                      Working...
                      X