How Do I Challenge an Unreasonable Registration Fee (Not an Administration Charge)?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Joe Forit
    replied
    Originally posted by L4NDLORD View Post
    Unreasonable freeholders are killing this business for the reasonable operators. sighs......
    Amen to that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joe Forit
    replied
    [QUOTE=eagle2;n1178241]I don't think that you need worry that your payment will not be accepted, these types of freeholders do not normally tune away money. It is more likely that they will apply the payment against the disputed charges and claim that any remaining balance relates to ground rent. I suggest that you make it crystal clear that you are paying ground rent and retain proof because it is unlikely to end there.

    Is there any chance of forming a RTM Company or purchasing the freehold?

    Oddly enough, the same people did not cash a "full and final settlement" cheque that I sent them a few years ago (different circumstances, not involving ground rent). We eventually managed to resolve that issue, cheque then cashed and everyone happy, though it took a while.

    Currently around 98 years left on a 125 year lease with leaseholder owned Management Company, so freeholder does not have enough involvement to create urgency to remove him. Perhaps in ten years time, by which time politicians may have made it a bit easier / cheaper for us to do.

    Leave a comment:


  • L4NDLORD
    replied
    Unreasonable freeholders are killing this business for the reasonable operators. sighs......

    Leave a comment:


  • eagle2
    replied
    I don't think that you need worry that your payment will not be accepted, these types of freeholders do not normally tune away money. It is more likely that they will apply the payment against the disputed charges and claim that any remaining balance relates to ground rent. I suggest that you make it crystal clear that you are paying ground rent and retain proof because it is unlikely to end there.

    Is there any chance of forming a RTM Company or purchasing the freehold?

    Leave a comment:


  • Joe Forit
    replied
    Originally posted by Section20z View Post

    Haven't you got their bank details ? You just pay it in with "ground rent" as reference and email confirmation.
    job done
    I usually do pay the ground rent by bank transfer. I was thinking a suitably endorsed cheque and covering letter would give them less wriggle room for suggesting the payment was for something else, though I suppose the 'ground rent' payment reference should do the trick. I would probably have to write to them anyway - I do not want these clowns to start communicating with me via email, they might send ten daft letters every day!

    Leave a comment:


  • Joe Forit
    replied
    Originally posted by vmart View Post
    It is best to keep ground rent separate from other matters. When you send your cheque make sure you write "ground rent" on the reverse and state the period the ground rent pertains to; and include a covering letter. Obtain the cheque back from your bank once it has cleared.

    When you paid the £24 did you state it was in full and final settlement of the registration fee; and did the landlord accept the payment?
    Thanks vmart. No, I didn't pay the £24 in full and final settlement. I think eagle2 suggested that as an option earlier in this thread, but I decided against. I'm fairly happy with that decision - it means I am 100% confident that the lease has been complied with in relation to the subletting, because the F/H has had a reasonable fee, even though he does not like it. I am tending to agree with the advice to keep the ground rent separate.

    Leave a comment:


  • Section20z
    replied
    Originally posted by Joe Forit View Post

    Yes, it's them not cashing the cheque that worries me slightly.
    Haven't you got their bank details ? You just pay it in with "ground rent" as reference and email confirmation.
    job done

    Leave a comment:


  • Joe Forit
    replied
    Originally posted by JK0 View Post
    I think if you do that, they just won't cash the cheque. They'll keep doing that until the ground rent goes over £350, and then try to forfeit the lease.
    Yes, it's them not cashing the cheque that worries me slightly.

    Leave a comment:


  • vmart
    replied
    It is best to keep ground rent separate from other matters. When you send your cheque make sure you write "ground rent" on the reverse and state the period the ground rent pertains to; and include a covering letter. Obtain the cheque back from your bank once it has cleared.

    When you paid the £24 did you state it was in full and final settlement of the registration fee; and did the landlord accept the payment?

    Leave a comment:


  • JK0
    replied
    I think if you do that, they just won't cash the cheque. They'll keep doing that until the ground rent goes over £350, and then try to forfeit the lease.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joe Forit
    replied
    UPDATE & FURTHER QUESTIONS
    Having paid £24 for registration of my subletting notice in May, I have received a total of eight letters on this subject from the freeholder and replied promptly to all of them. The freeholder is consistent in wanting a further £96, but the letters are otherwise full of nonsense and show no evidence of them having read or understood either my replies or the lease – they ask for information that the F/H has already acknowledged receipt of or does not need and (helpfully to me) list all sorts of things other than registering a notice that the F/H might do in order to justify their fee, none of which are relevant in my case – I only need to pay a reasonable fee for registering a notice.

    F/H’s seventh letter added a purported fee to my “account”, “as no satisfactory response has been received”, and their most recent letter was a letter before action, with a further purported fee. Naturally I replied explaining, again, the error of their ways and asking for confirmation that I owe them nothing and for an apology for their harassment of me.

    All the above is fine with me, I would rather reply to stupid letters than send money to a shyster just to make them go away. I would encourage anyone in a similar position to do the same. I realise that their imaginary fees are currently sitting on my imaginary account. It is now almost three months since the letter before action, so presumably their solicitors have also told them they are on a loser. I have now started to chase the F/H for confirmation that I owe them nothing and for an apology, and will continue to do so. I look forward to putting the correspondence in front of a judge one day if they do not respond positively.

    My questions relates to the ground rent payment that will become due soon. I understand that I need to make it abundantly clear that any money I send is not to be used for any of their fees, but should I try to take it a step further - should I send my cheque, “in full and final settlement of any and all monies currently owing in relation to the property”? If they cash the cheque, is that concrete proof that they accept that no fees are owed? If they do not cash the cheque, does that weaken my position because the ground rent has not been paid? Thanks for reading, any thoughts welcome!

    Leave a comment:


  • Joe Forit
    replied
    Originally posted by flyingfreehold View Post
    I hesitate to defend the freeholder,
    I'm all for defending freeholders when they are being unfairly maligned, but that does not apply in this case. The leaseholder run Management Company insures and manages the estate. I advise them of any sub-tenants, but the lease does not entitle them to receive a fee for this, so they do not attempt to charge one. The freeholder already has my correspondence address so they can send me invoices for ground rent. They would not be involved in any emergency situation. In fact, I doubt whether they could find the premises on a map.

    All the freeholder requires to register my notice is a pen, a book and someone to write a couple of names and dates therein. In practice, they are unlikely to ever need to refer to that entry once it has been made. As has been pointed out by tribunal chairmen, freeholders try to charge for everything that they might conceivably do, even though they are only entitled to charge for what they actually do (if the lease allows it).

    As Lawcruncher points out, the fee here is for registering the notice. If they wanted to add other charges, they should have put them in the lease. After all, it is freeholders who draw up leases, not leaseholders. I'm afraid my sympathy is limited on this one!

    Leave a comment:


  • Lawcruncher
    replied
    Originally posted by flyingfreehold View Post
    I hesitate to defend the freeholder, but there can be more involved than just receipting the notice and returning it.
    But that is what the fee is expressed to be for - or to be exact for registering the notice.

    All the rest is part and parcel of the administration involved in managing property.

    Leave a comment:


  • flyingfreehold
    replied
    I hesitate to defend the freeholder, but there can be more involved than just receipting the notice and returning it. Some insurers want to know if an insured premises is let rather than owner occupied (perceived to be slightly worse loss history) so the broker may need to be informed by email or letter and there is likely to be the need to change the contact details both for the lessee and to add into tenancy management programmes contact details for the sub lessee, so that in the event of water pouring from the flat, it is possible to access sub-tenants contact details in a hurry or even remotely. I don't think £20 plus VAT is enough to cover the cost of the work involved, bearing in mind the huge costs of operating a property management office with professional staff and IT systems. The big managing agents do try to charge a bit too much for notice fees, and for most other services come to that, and a reasonable fee is probably somewhere around £75 plus VAT

    Leave a comment:


  • Joe Forit
    replied
    Originally posted by eagle2 View Post

    Parliament is to consider leasehold reform over the next 12 months so I suggest that you contact your MP and request changes to the legislation.
    Ultimately that seems to be the only way forward with many of life's inequities. Unfortunately these days, even the formal 'consultations' prior to legislation seem to be greatly restricted by their online format. You are only given the opportunity to comment on how the deckchairs should be arranged on the Titanic, because the Government has already made the decision to steer towards the iceberg.

    Leave a comment:

Latest Activity

Collapse

  • Reply to 2-1 transfer - what does Freeholder do?
    by CStevens
    check the tenant's lease but normally you should (a) ensure all rent and service charges are paid up to date; (b) check that there are no existing breaches of the lease. If there are then you should require the tenant to deal with these before agreeing to acknowledge the transfer.

    With...
    27-05-2022, 06:34 AM
  • 2-1 transfer - what does Freeholder do?
    by Flashback1966
    I am a Freeholder. Have a flat there too. I have received an email from the leaseholder's soclitors acting for Mr A. They are doing a 2-1 transfer from the names of Mr A and Ms B to just Mr.

    The solicitors want to know the requirements on completion.

    Is is just a notice of...
    26-05-2022, 18:46 PM
  • Share of feehold/shared service charges?
    by Stu1020
    Hi there,

    I'm new to the forum and looking for advice on a sticky freehold situation.

    I own a two-bed flat in a converted building with two one-beds. The lease states that a fair proportion is payable towards the service charge. However, there has been a running agreement of...
    20-05-2022, 11:39 AM
  • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
    by CStevens
    You dont have to proceed on the existing agreement nor do you have to proceed on the share paid for the freehold. If the lease's state that it has to be a fair and reasonable amount then that's what it should be - whether you calculate that based on use, sq ft of the flats is really down to debate unless...
    27-05-2022, 06:30 AM
  • Reply to 2-1 transfer - what does Freeholder do?
    by Lawcruncher
    The fee is for registering the notice which takes no more than a minute. £5 works out at an hourly rate of £300 which is extremely generous for the amount of work and skill involved....
    27-05-2022, 05:52 AM
  • Old managing agents accounts
    by jazzythumper
    Since obtaining the RTM and changing the managing agent, we have never been given full accounts / receipts for the previous year(s). We believe that as the old freeholder and leaser holder of one of the flats were represented by the same solicitor that prior to the sale of the freehold, we were subsidising...
    20-05-2022, 11:21 AM
  • Reply to Old managing agents accounts
    by eagle2
    The sale of the freehold is relevant, your claim would be against the current freeholder, who may not possess and may be unable to obtain the information which you require. It would be up to the new freeholder to try to recover monies from the previous freeholder The RTM Company is only relevant to...
    27-05-2022, 05:00 AM
  • Reply to 2-1 transfer - what does Freeholder do?
    by flyingfreehold
    A "reasonable" notice fee is rather more than £5 !
    27-05-2022, 02:05 AM
  • Reply to 2-1 transfer - what does Freeholder do?
    by AndrewDod
    On what exact basis is the "fee" - what does lease say? Since you are doing it yourself, if a fee is allowed, would have thought "reasonable" might be about £5 for 10 minutes
    26-05-2022, 21:34 PM
  • Section 20
    by Anna1985
    So the lease allows for the property to be kept in good condition.
    Thus, the shared hall could be spruced up no problem, but there is an issue with driveway - partially it belongs to the freeholder, partially to the ground floor leaseholder - it is made out of the old paving stones, it looks...
    22-05-2022, 21:03 PM
Working...
X