Director of a Residential Management Company Issue

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    There is a time to be firm and a time to offer assistance and contacting leaseholders does not do any harm, it can only encourage the ongoing relationship. There are numerous factors involved and it is unreasonable to have one system which fits all. Management nor leases nor legal action nor Tribunals can be defined in black and white terms, there are too many grey areas. It is all very well saying that solicitors; letters will be added to the debt, but 7 times out of 10, they will be added to the service charges and other leaseholders will rightly question why the costs were incurred. How long does it take to collect monies when taking legal action? If you can agree a repayment plan with the leaseholder in a shorter period, it is far better than running the risk of incurring costs for all leaseholders.

    Comment


      #17
      Well of course if crooked freeholders add private legal costs to the service charge that will not be a legitimate service charge item and would inevitably be rejected at Tribunal. And if it is happening repeatedly and if the Directors cannot be removed the building will probably end up with a Tribunal appointed manager or completely derelict.

      Comment


        #18
        That happens too, in fact it seems to be the freeholders who are the most guilty of abuse who are the first to threaten legal action.
        Much as I am enjoying this debate, I am aware that we are departing from the original question.

        Comment


          #19
          Hey all

          Thanks so much for your all your input. It is good to have clarity.

          My other question though, as he is a director, could what he did (rallying other leases to agree with his idea to pause the payments) be classed as fraud due to it being for his personal reasons and not the interests of the company and the repairs that need to happen?

          We have not taken legal action as a payment plan has been agreed. But this director is now not voting yes for the essential works to take place. Even though previously agreed and logged in minutes, they have come back months later and said the minutes lie (no email dispute was made at the time the minutes were sent round). The reason being they don't agree with the spec (we have sought advice on the spec, and it is the minimum work we need for the repair, no further costs can be cut). This too me screams a red flag. The management company concerned about this directors behaviour and is cautious about how to proceed, even though the majority have voted in favour for the works to proceed.

          Has anyone experienced a director like this before, or know how is best to act? If we don't get the works booked in we risk further damage and health and safety risks to the properties.

          Again, any advice welcomed.

          Comment


            #20
            There is nothing unusual with a director holding a different view to other directors, but his actions were inappropriate, he should represent the board's view and set an example. It is not fraud, he probably considered that he was acting in the interests of a majority or significant number of leaseholders. A director can also change his mind for whatever reason. The board should continue to make decisions based on a majority vote and all directors should be reminded that they should accept decisions. The director should not be removed simply because he has a different opinion but he should be warned that if he acts against the board decisions in future, he may be asked to resign..

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by eagle2 View Post
              The director should not be removed simply because he has a different opinion but he should be warned that if he acts against the board decisions in future, he may be asked to resign..
              Hey thanks for your reply. I would never think to remove someone for having a different opinion, i think it is necessary to have diversity within the board, it is more their motivations seem personal and not in the interests of the company. If any director isn't making decisions in the interests of the company what is the best way forward? How would you go about asking a director to resign? I am 99% sure they would not do voluntarily in this instance as we have already said to them what we think this decision looks like, so I don't think it is an option. They are tremendously stubborn.



              Comment


                #22
                It is useful to consider the views of minorities and as long as you can outvote him, it should not be a problem, Good communication with the members is important in these cases. It is often better to keep the director involved so that you can try to understand his views, reason with him and plan your moves..Otherwise. you would simply ask him to resign and explain that if he does not agree, you will ask the members to decide.

                Comment


                  #23
                  ThanksEagle, we have a meeting arranged for next week to vote on some big decisions so I guess we will see how it goes!

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by eagle2 View Post
                    You can destroy a good relationship in an instant by even threatening legal action and it can take a long time to restore trust. It can also lead to charges being challenged when they may have been accepted otherwise. It pays to know your leaseholders and contact those who normally pay regularly and enquire if there is a problem. There are ways of assisting leaseholders. You may be able to offer monthly payments instead of half yearly payments or you may be able to offer loans and charge interest for the benefit of all leaseholders. Agents will not offer this service, they do not care if you have a good relationship, they prefer to push a button after 14 days and send automatic reminders followed by threats of legal action. Sometimes agents benefit by taking legal action because that gives them the right to charge additional sums. Unless the costs are recovered in full, which rarely happens, especially in these times, all leaseholders will suffer,.
                    Not all agents behave this way ; and ultimately they do as the directors advise. We asked ours if we could not send out demad letters and to look at payment plans . it has helped those that found things hard

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by thenunn View Post

                      Not all agents behave this way ; and ultimately they do as the directors advise. We asked ours if we could not send out demad letters and to look at payment plans . it has helped those that found things hard
                      That is the way that it should be run, good for you. Unfortunately there are many agents who control the directors, some even select the individuals to become directors, The agent then advises the directors to appoint the agent to manage and its contractors to carry out works etc The agent's appointment is never at risk of being terminated. That is how trust monies are not held properly in the first place and then they are wasted and disappear.

                      Comment

                      Latest Activity

                      Collapse

                      • Breach of leasehold terms with floor that's causing noise; who to enforce?
                        by SharedOwnrshpLeaseholdr
                        My upstair's neighbour's lease requires him to provide "carpets, or such other suitable floor coverings", and it also has a "nuisance" clause. He has had his flat tiled. I am now being driven nuts by noise from above. Every movement results in impact noise transmission, and I'm going...
                        13-05-2021, 21:58 PM
                      • Unreasonable Withholding of Consent by Freeholder?
                        by wabdiddly
                        Dear All,

                        Looking for an opinion and some legal views behind what I can do in the following situation.

                        My top floor flat has rather wonky flooring, which the structural engineer's report described as "in poor condition and needs levelling to provide satisfactory living...
                        13-05-2021, 18:29 PM
                      • Reply to Unreasonable Withholding of Consent by Freeholder?
                        by Lawcruncher
                        You do not need permission to carry out repairs if you have an obligation to do them.

                        If the lease only prohibits structural alterations you can carry out non-structural alterations. Taking down or putting up non-structural walls is not structural. What exactly does your lease say about...
                        13-05-2021, 21:25 PM
                      • Tenants refusing to vacate
                        by Landlord2021
                        Our tenants have been issued with a section 21 back in December. Having had six months notice they are now refusing to vacate the property as their new build house is not ready. We have sold the property subject to contract. Our buyers want to take advantage of the stamp duty holiday. What if anything...
                        13-05-2021, 17:10 PM
                      • Reply to Tenants refusing to vacate
                        by theartfullodger
                        An s21 notice does not end a tenancy nor compel a tenant to leave. The tenant is simply exercising their right, unde s5 of Housing Act 1988 ( Thatcher's ) to remain until court, court order, bailiffs/HCEO. The self-same Act ( Thatcher's ) that permits us landlords to serve s21s.

                        Their agreement...
                        13-05-2021, 19:19 PM
                      • Reply to Tenants refusing to vacate
                        by Jon66
                        Write to them pointing out you are now able to proceed to court and that you intend to do so. That this will incur costs and legal fees, that court judgements of any sort would not reflect well on their mortgage application, that once a possession order has been granted you will incur additional bailiff...
                        13-05-2021, 18:55 PM
                      • Lack of lighting in communal areas
                        by fos333
                        Hi all,

                        Who is responsible if the lack of lighting in the communal area results in injury to the occupiers of the flats?

                        The lights for the two main blocks are controlled by two photocells that can be adjusted, but at 2100 hrs tonight the internal communal lights had still...
                        12-05-2021, 20:26 PM
                      • Reply to Lack of lighting in communal areas
                        by fos333
                        Thanks for the replies.

                        The managing agent instructs the adjustment of the photocells, however, the current directors are ignorant to the issue now as it can't be impacting on them.

                        Further to the communal lighting not coming on early enough is the fact that the managing agent...
                        13-05-2021, 18:44 PM
                      • Evidence of leasehold interest?
                        by Bengt Lagander
                        I have just completed on the purchase of a long Leasehold flat.

                        Separately I am apply for a Court order restoration of the Limited Company that own the freehold which was dissolved on 15 th June 2015 so the application needs to be sent by server to the Court before 15th June 2021. This...
                        13-05-2021, 18:19 PM
                      • Reply to Tenants refusing to vacate
                        by 1600e
                        There is nothing you can do other than see if a hefty lump sum will persuade them....
                        13-05-2021, 18:10 PM
                      Working...
                      X