New MA demanding service charge payment for Old MA complaint

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • eagle2
    replied
    That cannot be right, your contract (lease) must be with your freeholder and agents only act on behalf of the freeholder, so I would ignore the agents completely and go to the FTT naming the freeholder as the other party. Governing bodies rarely assist and usually respond after a lengthy delay with a statement that it is a legal matter and they cannot intervene.

    Leave a comment:


  • I Like Letting
    replied
    Tribunal option not open to cases involving former managing agents. Update - I got a 'get stuffed' letter from my MP so that's a dead end. BUT new MA has dropped the rope and recommended that I complain to the former MA's governing bodies. I'm thinking that he got a prod from his governing body that I got in touch with so is being rather compliant now. So my 'debt' is being held on file awaiting action from old MA's governing bodies who should prompt old MA to deal with my complaint satisfactorily. I happened to mention that I was advised to do this by new MA. By the tone of his letter I'm guessing he got legal advice that said he shouldn't be hassling me and that it truly is a problem for the old MA to resolve. Roll on leasehold reform.

    Leave a comment:


  • eagle2
    replied
    You will probably need to apply to a Tribunal to determine whether or not the charges are reasonable. Professional bodies do not get involved normally if there are legal issues which can be resolved through the court or a tribunal.

    Leave a comment:


  • I Like Letting
    replied
    I've now written to my area MP. I will let you know what transpires.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gordon999
    replied
    Section20z,

    You probably have gained enough information over 20 years battle on that freehold company to get your local MPs in Southend to join the APPG ( In Parliament ) for leasehold reform .

    Leave a comment:


  • I Like Letting
    replied
    Allocate payment to the oldest debt? Even though they send me an invoice and I pay that amount? This is getting murkier and murkier. Eeek. A 20 year battle? That's terrible. I may well have to pay up but they will get plenty of aggravation and bad publicity first! The thing is, they don't demand any money, they just mention it if I do.

    Leave a comment:


  • Section20z
    replied
    As you point out, you will have to pay if you want to sell or extend your lease. The other issue you will have is the MA will allocate any payment you make to the oldest debt so to force court action you will need to withhold all payments (except perhaps ground rent) but be prepared for a hard long fight .
    I have had a 20 year battle with some notorious Southend shysters which only settled last year - for less than half the £60k they were claiming.
    You may also find your tenants harassed by hand delivered demands.
    Easiest route is pay up and sell up

    Leave a comment:


  • I Like Letting
    replied
    Wow that website makes for very harrowing reading. My issue is nothing compared to the leaseholders with outrageous unaffordable cladding bills. Thanks for that but I can't see the leasehold abuse article? I see there are c4 million leasehold dwellings in the UK. I can understand the problem of needing a lease for a block of flats that needs a specialised maintenance schedule and how some leaseholders might be more problematic to make payments towards upkeep but it's too easy for managers to abuse their power. I am finding that the only way to get any control is to always be on the defensive with the MA and dare them to think about ripping us all off. So far it's working......I'm a texbook flea in their ear.....

    Leave a comment:


  • Gordon999
    replied
    Originally posted by I Like Letting View Post
    Strangely enough, I was thinking about taking this up with my MP, Gordon. Mine is a known pompous git that doesn't seem to care much for underdogs at all. I got an email back from one of the MAs professional bodies whose logo is displayed on this website and he's not even a member. I should get a reply from my 'get stuffed' response to his demand for money. I'll let you all know what he says.
    The Daily Mail and Sunday Times have printed a report on leasehold abuse this month which you can read on the Leasehold Knowledge website or at your public library . Print a copy to show your local MP and get him/her to join the the APPG and to write to the Housing Minister about your problems. Ask the local MP to write a piece on how he/she is helping his voters ( leaseholders ) , for printing in the local newspaper.

    Leave a comment:


  • I Like Letting
    replied
    Strangely enough, I was thinking about taking this up with my MP, Gordon. Mine is a known pompous git that doesn't seem to care much for underdogs at all. I got an email back from one of the MAs professional bodies whose logo is displayed on this website and he's not even a member. I should get a reply from my 'get stuffed' response to his demand for money. I'll let you all know what he says.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gordon999
    replied
    You should bring your complaint to your local MP and urge him or her to join the APPG for Leasehold Reform in Parliament which you can get further information on the "leasehold knowledge partnership" website.

    Leave a comment:


  • I Like Letting
    replied
    Thank you Macromia. Yes, the disputed charge demands are stacked towards admin with inflated repair costs for very poor repairs, fees for inspection visits from their staff who lacked the expertise to question the work, 6 quarters in a single year (when there are only 4 and we've been charged for 6) and so on and on....A remote MA that employed companies from hundreds of miles away to 'maintain' the property while the building became more and more delapidated.

    I know what you mean about professional bodies, but they must have a code of conduct and they don't want the bad publicity so they might prod him into acting. Yes, this is blackmail towards a consumer. I can consult my solicitor at some point but it's now a heck of a spreadsheet and a costly exercise to pick the bones out of so I would rather the costs came from the MA's direction and not mine.

    It just doesn't seem fair that I've been pleading for someone to hear me for 2.5 years and yet the blackmailers know they can win if I decided to sell. I've also contacted the local press - not as any form of blackmail for the new MA of course but it's good to know that I can remove income to more than the dispute value from the local struggling MA with his local shop that is sited right opposite the building. Popcorn anyone?

    Leave a comment:


  • Macromia
    replied
    Presumably the disputed amounts are either service charge demands or administration charges?
    You can start a tribunal case to determine how much is 'reasonable' - but this will cost you money that you might not get back (many tribunals seem reluctant to award costs even if the party that starts the case wins on most, or sometimes even all, contested charges).
    You are right that the Freeholder is unlikely to start a court case themselves, if there is any doubt about whether or not they might win, because they can wait it out and basically blackmail leaseholders into giving up and paying if they want to sell the flat or extend the lease.

    it is very unlikely that you will have any luck with the 'professional' bodies that either managing agent belongs to. The managing agents have virtually no 'burden of proof' to convince the bodies that their membership fees support that their actions in pursuing an alleged debt are reasonable.

    Leave a comment:


  • New MA demanding service charge payment for Old MA complaint

    The freeholder and managing agent (MA) changed hands while I was disputing very poor management and extortionate services charges with the old MA. The old MA will not resolve my dispute, the new MA continues to demand payment. The ombudsman can't intervene because I'm outside their scheme (charges don't apply to new agent). I've put everything in writing but the new MA couldn't read my simple spreadsheet of logged dispute items. When I attempted to sell the property the new MA demanded payment as part of the exchange of contracts. Sale fell through so I've decided to retain the leasehold and let the property.

    Dispute is for £1800. I've told the new MA to take me to court (fairly certain my case is strong enough to win/meet half way) but they don't seem to be motivated to do that either. They know they can play the waiting game until I sell or extend the unmortgageable lease. I've also just started a complaint with the new MA's professional body to put pressure on them to resolve. I seem to be stuck and would like to know some routes to get this matter looked at and resolved. I can't start court action because I don't have a court demand for payment. Is it worth trying the old MA's professional body (RICS)? Consumer law seems to apply but MA's seem to be above that law. Lease terms say 'reasonable charges' and not one of them is. Many thanks for any input.

Latest Activity

Collapse

  • Understanding a lease
    by Pattyb
    Can anyone tell me what this means and how much ground rent is to be paid and when ?

    TIA

    To hold the demised premises unto the Lease from the nineteenth day of December One thousand nine hundred and fifty-four for the term of nine hundred and ninety-nine years yielding and...
    10-04-2021, 21:29 PM
  • Reply to Understanding a lease
    by Lawcruncher
    [QUOTE=Macromia;n1151621]There is also the possibility that, if the roof space is not demised to the upper flat but the only access is via the flat, you may effectively have rights to the area even if it is not clearly demised to you in the lease.
    I think this relies on the lease also not clearly...
    11-04-2021, 14:52 PM
  • Reply to Negotiating new leases
    by Lawcruncher
    I am not sure mediation is what is needed here as there does not seem to be a dispute as such.

    It is in the interest of both parties to do a deal if they want more freedom to extend and to increase the saleability of their flats.

    You need to go into detail to avoid future problems...
    11-04-2021, 14:47 PM
  • Negotiating new leases
    by Cornflower
    Hi, can anyone advise, please?. I am joint freeholder with one other flat, with less than 60 years remaining on our respective leases. As neighbours we do not get on, mainly caused by the fact that the lease states that we have a shared garden. When I moved in years ago, the garden was divided into...
    11-04-2021, 11:22 AM
  • Reply to Negotiating new leases
    by flyingfreehold
    see if you can get your co-freeholder to get round a table or on zoom with a skilled mediator. Many experienced lawyers become mediators. Its a better bet than litigation in so far as the parties can usually iron things out with a mediator's help.
    11-04-2021, 13:44 PM
  • RTM Director accuses another Director of fraud/stealing
    by KAH
    I am a RTM Director with two other Directors. We have appointed a external management company to help us run the management of our properties. Three property owners have substansial historical arrears ( one of which is a current Director of the RTM company).

    Our managing agent has asked...
    06-04-2021, 17:07 PM
  • Reply to RTM Director accuses another Director of fraud/stealing
    by fos333
    Thank you for the reply.

    However, very difficult to do when the MA refuses to correspond with you or return calls when messages have been left concerning the arrears.

    Even worse when acting as a "professional managing agent" terminates the agreement due to differences...
    11-04-2021, 11:49 AM
  • Major Works and Consultation "Section 20" A Warning
    by leaseholdanswers
    A recent decision has made a huge change in the interpretation of the law in Phillips & Ors V Francis

    Since 1985, service charge expenditure has been subject to control

    1 Fair and Reasonable in all respects in what is being done, how, when and it's procurement and delivery....
    28-01-2013, 15:10 PM
  • Reply to Major Works and Consultation "Section 20" A Warning
    by ram
    Please start a New topic. There is already one on here about your same problem.-in fact seems identical.
    irespective that its probably S20 related, it is a maintenence FH problem you have.
    11-04-2021, 10:17 AM
  • Reply to Major Works and Consultation "Section 20" A Warning
    by Chitty
    Service charge no consultation for major work
    I am piggy backing to this thread . Grateful for some thoughts and advise.
    My Freeholder(FH) wants me to pay for their engineer’s report on cause of damage to a balcony roof over my ceiling of my Ground floor flat. Also FH’s surveyor fees...
    11-04-2021, 09:50 AM
Working...
X