Retrospective consent licence and reasonable fees

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lawcruncher

    But first things first:

    When was the extension constructed?

    Please quote in full the lease clause(s) relating to alterations.

    On the purchase were questions asked of the landlord or managing agents? If, so, what were the questions and answers in respect of alterations and if the tenant was in breach of covenant?

    Has the landlord or agent inspected since you bought? If so, when?

    Has rent been demanded or accepted since you bought? If so, when was the last occasion?

    Leave a comment:

  • jils
    started a topic Retrospective consent licence and reasonable fees

    Retrospective consent licence and reasonable fees

    Hello there,

    I purchased a leasehold flat a few years ago and have recently been contacted by the managing agents acting on behalf of the freeholder to say that a small rear extension at the property (built before my purchase) does not have consent. Naturally I am quite worried about this, but even more so as the flat is currently on the market.

    The agents have advised that we need to be granted a retrospective consent licence and have quoted £4,000 in an email that I note was marked "without prejudice" which I understand means cannot be used in future legal conversations, which struck me as odd. I have since looked online and have found that this agency has been involved in disputes in the past to do with extortionate consent fees, so I'm quite concerned.

    The agents have advised that I get in touch with the solicitors who assisted in the purchase as it could be likely we have a case against them if they did not do the right checks, and that the solicitors insurance will cover the consent licence fees. I have looked at the documents we received at the time and although the extension was listed as an alteration by the sellers on an information form, no indication was given about consent. We didn't flag this with the solicitors further - do we have a leg to stand on re: them not doing further checks?

    I understand that freeholders are able to charge alteration fees, but that they must be "reasonable". Unfortunately it has been very hard to find information about retrospective consent and what a reasonable fee actually is. Does anyone have any insight they can share? Is £4,000 a fair fee, is there room for negotiation, is it likely we are being charged too much as a punt (the "without prejudice" has made me wonder")?

    Thank you very much for any help you may be able to give!

Latest Activity


  • Reply to Management of client account closure
    by eagle2
    The RICS code paragraph 6,1 states that an agent holds client money in trust and if it fails to account for that money properly, it is open to legal action for breach of that trust and criminal liability could arise....
    27-02-2021, 07:07 AM
  • Management of client account closure
    by AndrewDod
    I suppose this belongs in this forum but is more general.

    Let's suppose a managing agent for a RTM holds client accounts a) service charge b) reserve fund. They are held in trust but the account manager is the agent.

    Manager's contract comes to an end and is not renewed. Can...
    25-02-2021, 20:57 PM
  • Reply to Management of client account closure
    by eagle2
    ARMA has produced an advice note which states that agents are required to ensure that the handover is as smooth as possible. It states that they must deal with handovers in a professional competent and efficient manner. It states that any funds which aren’t needed to manage the block must be passed...
    27-02-2021, 06:58 AM
  • Fire doors as front doors to flats
    by Codger
    Some leaseholders have installed front doors that have upvc frames and glass panels. It is likely to be mentioned in a fire risk assessment for the block so I wonder what we can do to enforce a recommendation to install firedoors.
    22-02-2021, 11:07 AM
  • Reply to Fire doors as front doors to flats
    by Jericho
    Unless you can find someone who you can be sure will fit doors to spec you're risking wasting a load of money....
    26-02-2021, 18:59 PM
  • Lease still 106 years - should I extend now or later?
    by jay 101

    I have a 2 bed flat in London that I rent out. Value of flat is approx 260-280k. 106 years remaining on the lease. I was lead to believe that it's best to extend the lease before it becomes fewer than 100 years remaining but was after opinions as to whether or not this is true?
    24-02-2021, 14:49 PM
  • Reply to Lease still 106 years - should I extend now or later?
    by sgclacy
    It will have no effect as marriage value kicks in when the term is less than 80 years...
    26-02-2021, 17:36 PM
  • Rtm
    by mags69

    Can anyone tell me whether the value of a flat is adversely affected if the development is self managed by an RTM? I've been told that the value is reduced by 35% and I would not be able to get a mortgage. Thanks
    25-02-2021, 17:20 PM
  • Reply to Rtm
    by eagle2
    You should deal with those owners before they cause damage to the RTM. It is always worth considering their points of view and trying to accommodate them or explain your reasons why you cannot. Communication with the other owners is also important so that a minority does not influence others....
    26-02-2021, 14:27 PM
  • RTM - right to manage reserve funds separate to Property Management service funds?
    by rej
    Our block RTM has switched property managers for the past 10 years 4 times given we can't seem to find a property manager for our London block who after the first 6 months to a year continues to manage the block well without hiring their own "shady" suppliers who seem to charge 5 - 10x what...
    26-02-2021, 11:42 AM