Unauthorised lease variation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Tried that Gordon the broker refused they said they will only give the information to the Principal and even RICS guide states they need to be transparent

    Comment


      #17
      Macromia,

      You don't happen to be a managing agent yourself do you? as you seem to put forward that managing agents can do stuff when they cant as I have said earlier unless you are FCA authorized or RICS members you cant claims handle or take commissions. That comes straight from the horses mouth the FCA.

      Comment


        #18
        Another angle I thought about under due diligence should the insurance brokers be doing deals with non FCA members...may report the brokers to the FCA as well.

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by Gordon999 View Post
          But there is nothing to stop you demanding the broker to reveal how much commission is paid to your managing agent or freeholder.
          Originally posted by Stacker View Post
          Tried that Gordon the broker refused they said they will only give the information to the Principal and even RICS guide states they need to be transparent
          There is no legal obligation for the broker to provide any specific information about a policy to anyone except the policyholder (or in some circumstances relevant law enforcement bodies).
          If you wish to know anything about insurance policies that apply to your leasehold property you will have to request the information from the managing agent and/or freeholder. Managing agents are supposed to disclose any commission that they make (if they get anything at all) but I believe that this is 'best practice' rather than a legal obligation, and freeholders currently don't have any obligation to tell you anything about commissions.



          ​​​​​​​
          Originally posted by Stacker View Post
          You don't happen to be a managing agent yourself do you? as you seem to put forward that managing agents can do stuff when they cant as I have said earlier unless you are FCA authorized or RICS members you cant claims handle or take commissions. That comes straight from the horses mouth the FCA.
          No, I'm not a managing agent. In my experience, managing agents are generally pretty much useless and don't even come close to providing value for money for leaseholders. Unfortunately, current laws allow leaseholders to be fleeced because they are mainly influenced by organisations that protect the people who make money off leaseholders.


          ​​​​​​​
          Originally posted by Stacker View Post
          Another angle I thought about under due diligence should the insurance brokers be doing deals with non FCA members...may report the brokers to the FCA as well.
          Since your original, vaguely worded query didn't mention insurance commissions or insurance claims, I don't think that Gordon should have even brought up FCA authorisation - it seems to have led you off on what seems to be a pointless tangent that I doubt has any hope of getting you any sort of worthwhile result.

          A few additional questions for you (even though you have still made no attempt to provide the information that I asked for earlier (without which you cannot be given appropriate advice):

          1. Do you have any evidence that a commission has been paid to either the managing agent, or the freeholder, as a result of insurance being placed with this particular broker?
          2. Are you aware of any recent claims having been made on the insurance, or any claims that are currently being made?
          3. Do you have any evidence that the managing agents have been directly involved with any negotiations about the insurance (whether while the insurance was being arranged, or as part of the handling of any claim), or any evidence that they advised the freeholders about the arrangement of the policy or how any claim should be settled?

          If the answer to questions 1 & 3 is "no", you have nothing to go to the FCA with.

          Comment


            #20
            Macromia I sense we will have to agree to disagree on some points as you are frankly coming across as a defender of the freeholder, I wonder if you are a freeholder, member director yourself? You are entitled to your opinions however that is all they are opinions. I tend to go to the authorities such as the Financial Ombudsman, RICS, Property Ombudsman and a solicitor I would rely more on their advice including LEASE than your opinion. So I will leave you on that note as I have also been looking at past Tribunal papers and I have been fortunate to find as you have done in the past good case law which supports my case.

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by Stacker View Post
              I sense we will have to agree to disagree on some points as you are frankly coming across as a defender of the freeholder, I wonder if you are a freeholder, member director yourself?
              Agreeing to disagree is something that people should only do if the subject is a matter of personal opinion. It shouldn't be considered a 'solution' when either the relevant facts are unknown or one side refuse to accept them.
              In this case you haven't provided the information that is necessary to answer your queries. If you would do so, it is possible that I might agree that you have a case that might be successful in a court or tribunal (and, no, I am not a freeholder, or a director on freehold company - and nothing I have posted is in defence of freeholders).



              Originally posted by Stacker View Post
              You are entitled to your opinions however that is all they are opinions.
              Um, yes.
              That's what you get as replies on forums. Most of the people who reply like to give informed opinions - but that requires the provision of relevant information relating to the query by the person asking for help.



              Originally posted by Stacker View Post
              I tend to go to the authorities such as the Financial Ombudsman, RICS, Property Ombudsman and a solicitor I would rely more on their advice including LEASE than your opinion.
              Any advice that 'authorities' might provide relies as much on the provision of the correct information as advice on a forum does. If you provide incomplete detail, or ask the wrong question, the advice that you get will not be appropriate, and may even be inappropriate.

              Without meaning to be rude, if you aren't going to post the information that is necessary in order for questions to be answered properly in a forum, and don't respect the opinions that you get as replies anyway because you prefer to go to 'authorities', why waste your own time, and the time of anyone who might reply, by posting forum questions in the first place?

              Comment

              Latest Activity

              Collapse

              • Reply to Old managing agents accounts
                by eagle2
                I suggest that you apply to or take action against the freeholder directly, the agent is only acting on behalf of the freeholder. If you think that the freeholder is likely to supply information, you can ask him to volunteer it otherwise you will apply to the Tribunal. If he is unlikely to volunteer...
                26-05-2022, 05:38 AM
              • Old managing agents accounts
                by jazzythumper
                Since obtaining the RTM and changing the managing agent, we have never been given full accounts / receipts for the previous year(s). We believe that as the old freeholder and leaser holder of one of the flats were represented by the same solicitor that prior to the sale of the freehold, we were subsidising...
                20-05-2022, 11:21 AM
              • Reply to Old managing agents accounts
                by jazzythumper
                would this be a good starting point?

                https://www.lease-advice.org/faq/how...eing-used-for/...
                25-05-2022, 15:37 PM
              • Reply to Old managing agents accounts
                by jazzythumper
                As in a simple application to the old managing agent Or freeholder? Which one?

                To provide all accounts and payments based on the fact that we disagree with the charges? How far back can we go? And does having paid the service charges mean we have agreed to these?

                Thanks for...
                25-05-2022, 15:31 PM
              • Reply to Freehold confusion
                by Section20z
                It's never advisable , it can cause serious issues if you have a claim affecting communal areas. For buildings insurance the whole property should be covered and the cost split between the two flats.
                The only problem with an absent freeholder is that when selling the flat a pernickity solicitor...
                25-05-2022, 10:02 AM
              • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
                by Stu1020
                eagle2,

                Thank you for the response.
                25-05-2022, 09:40 AM
              • Reply to Freehold confusion
                by AndrewDod
                There is no cast iron rule that the freehold "share" has to be transferred with any sale. You may need to purchase it from the friend (or his estate)....
                25-05-2022, 09:22 AM
              • Share of feehold/shared service charges?
                by Stu1020
                Hi there,

                I'm new to the forum and looking for advice on a sticky freehold situation.

                I own a two-bed flat in a converted building with two one-beds. The lease states that a fair proportion is payable towards the service charge. However, there has been a running agreement of...
                20-05-2022, 11:39 AM
              • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
                by eagle2
                I suggest that you ask the other 2 leaseholders to explain why they consider that the current allocation is fair. The freeholder has the right to review the allocation from time to time. Unfortunately, a "fair proportion" means that several alternatives would be considered reasonable to a...
                25-05-2022, 06:27 AM
              • RTM Hand Over Issues
                by martin15
                RTM handing over issues

                Our RTM companies comprise 4 blocks of 6 identical two bedroom flats and each block is registered at Companies House as a separate company.
                Following the acquisition date, it was discovered the former directors ignored legal advice and changed property management companies...
                23-05-2022, 19:36 PM
              Working...
              X