Why would a freeholder be reluctant to sell to leaseholders?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tipper
    Why not just exercise your statutory rights to enfranchise the freehold collectively?

    You need 50% plus of leaseholders to get involved/sign-up and an enfranchisement specialist valuer to do the haggling.

    Or just set up a management company and takeover the management using the 'Right to Manage' legislation.

    (Could be worth doing RTM first anyway as some freeholders are reluctant to hand over cash after the freehold has been enfranchised)

    See the lease.org website.

    Leave a comment:

  • Gordon999
    You should contact LEASE ( www.lease-advice.org ) and ask their legal advisor and get advice if you can take the freehold title at last sold price.

    Leave a comment:

  • Neil Morgan

    Yep. For that reason I tend to pay up while querying the figures for the record.

    Leave a comment:

  • Neil Morgan

    Thanks - the auction conditions made it clear that the buyer would have pay the hammer price AND make good any arrears to the seller, without full evidence being required from the seller. Is that normal? It seems like a big loophole.

    Leave a comment:

  • AndrewDod
    Freeholders actually MAKE money out of service charge arrears.......

    They engage an expensive lawyer to challenge the lessees, and get handsome backhanders. The only losers are the lessees.

    Leave a comment:

  • Section20z
    1. Could be any number of reasons, bid in error, read legal pack after, c 19, shill bidder etc etc

    2. Difficult question , in my opinion where lessees have reserved their rights it naturally reduces the hammer price as buyers know they are going to lose some costs. In fact I would never bid in such circumstances.
    I have served 5b notice in the past as an invitation to negotiate with lessees, so maybe try direct approach again ??

    Leave a comment:

  • Why would a freeholder be reluctant to sell to leaseholders?

    Hi everyone - complete newbie here. I found this interesting forum when Googling issues from the point of view of a long leaseholder.

    My situation is that I own a studio flat in London on a long lease, with my son in occupation. The freeholder is a property company that actually used to operate from the building, but then moved out and converted its offices into ground floor studio flats. The floors above it are also residential flats and the adjoining building is similar, but with a long leasehold office on the ground floor. There is a top floor flat going across both properties, which ties the freeholds together for practical purposes. So there are two freeholds and about a dozen leaseholders.

    Relations between the freeholder and leaseholders are not good - the usual tales of poor maintenance, service charges for minimal services, management fees comprising 33% of the total service charge, etc. You get the picture. Some leaseholders are in arrears/in dispute because of roof leaks that have not been remedied.

    Anyway, a couple of years ago, we got notified that the freeholds were to be auctioned. They did not sell - reserve presumably not met. This has now happened several times. The last time, the leaseholders got their act together, formed a limited company, and prepared to exercise our preemption rights under s6.3 of the LTA 1987. Sadly, we messed up and failed to submit a notice on behalf of the company as well as one on behalf of the tenants. Then we heard the freeholds had been sold, so we had missed out. But, a few weeks later, we hear that the buyer has failed to complete, so yet another auction is planned.

    I have two questions really.

    1. The fall of the hammer at auction is as binding as an exchange of contracts, as I understand. So how has the buyer failed to complete? I suppose lack of funds is one possibility, but are they able to get out eg because the level of service charge arrears has only just come to light?

    2. More importantly, as the freeholder knows the leaseholders have step in rights if they match the hammer price, why would the freeholder persist in going to auction repeatedly, and refuse to negotiate a price with the leaseholders in line with the most recent hammer price? is there any reason beyond a simple breakdown of relations?

    Thanks for reading - if you have!

Latest Activity


  • RTM setup for 1 estate comprised of 2 blocks
    by stokey83
    We are 2 blocks separated physically but located at the same address with one freeholder.
    We will be exercising our RTM with a large majority and we pay the SC in the same pot.
    We meet all criteria as qualifying tenants etc.
    Based on current law I understand 2 RTM companies...
    28-09-2020, 15:26 PM
  • Reply to Freeholder owns a number of leases, is this something to avoid?
    by andybenw
    I agree that you should have a very careful look at the condition of the building and what maintenance has taken place historically. The situation may be an advantage if the freeholder is intent on keeping the building in good condition due to the number of leases he/his family hold. Equally if all...
    28-09-2020, 10:45 AM
  • Freeholder owns a number of leases, is this something to avoid?
    by phatfish
    I am buying a flat in a block of 11 where the landlord is a small company with two directors. One happens to be the owner of the lease i would take possession of.

    The other does not own any of the leases directly, but some family members own at least 4 of them (maybe one or two more, i...
    27-09-2020, 17:43 PM
  • Reply to Freeholder owns a number of leases, is this something to avoid?
    by Section20z
    You need to be looking carefully at the service charge and how well the block is maintained. You could take the contrary view that they have a vested interest in maintaining the property and keeping costs reasonable.
    28-09-2020, 10:28 AM
  • 13 year back bill from freeholder
    by Carolinelambie21
    Hi , I can see a few topics similar to this but wanted some clarification.
    our freeholder hasn’t billed us since we bought our flat 13 years ago despite us asking him to.
    now we have notified we are selling so he has finally issued us a bill going back to 2007 for
    ground rent...
    28-09-2020, 08:06 AM
  • Reply to 13 year back bill from freeholder
    by Section20z
    No he can't but yes he can. If you are selling you really don't have much choice, if you begin a dispute then you will need to inform potential buyers who may be put off.
    If he's approachable why not offer 50% in full and final settlement, assuming you are obliged to pay insurance and electricity...
    28-09-2020, 08:18 AM
  • Reply to Freeholder owns a number of leases, is this something to avoid?
    by Macromia
    All leaseholders should be treated equally and in accordance with the terms of the lease. Unfortunately this isn't always what happens.

    Hypothetically, you have the same protections where the freeholder is a company owned by leaseholders, and run by directors who have a controlling interest,...
    28-09-2020, 01:19 AM
  • LPE1 Questions
    by comm1985
    For the purposes of LPE1 could someone clarify the below:

    1. Slightly confused by the terms 'Managed Area' and 'Common Parts'. For a building of 4 standalone flats with no communal areas or entrances.

    a) I assume the "Managed Area" is the building containing the...
    27-09-2020, 18:28 PM
  • Reply to LPE1 Questions
    by Macromia
    Managed area will include the building and any grounds, gardens, outbuildings, etc., basically anything that the leaseholders may be required to contribute to the maintenance of via service charges.

    Common parts would include communal corridors, gardens, etc., and may also include parts...
    28-09-2020, 01:08 AM
  • management and maintenance costs for parking court
    by cooked
    sorry this may in the wrong forum but I could not see a forum title which was relevant
    my wife and I own (leasehold) two flats in a block of 3 flats
    each of the 3 flats has two parking spaces in a 30 space parking court
    in 2018, we became the RTM for the building but the parking court...
    25-09-2020, 22:30 PM