License to Alter Premium Query

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by jazzythumper View Post
    Is this a sensible approach?
    Sorry, but absolutely not! Why give the landlord a windfall which cannot be justified? The landlord's interest in your flat is minimal. He or his predecessor took full value for it when the lease was granted.

    The law is clear. There is no need to pay.

    [QUOTE=jazzythumper;n1114609]With regards to point 3 if they didn't agree to this would it further reinforce that consent is unreasonably being withheld?/QUOTE]

    Not really, no, but if they do not come up with some good reasons for refusal they get close to unreasonably withholding consent..

    Comment


      #17
      [QUOTE=Lawcruncher;n1114655]

      Sorry, but absolutely not! Why give the landlord a windfall which cannot be justified? The landlord's interest in your flat is minimal. He or his predecessor took full value for it when the lease was granted.

      The law is clear. There is no need to pay.

      Originally posted by jazzythumper View Post
      With regards to point 3 if they didn't agree to this would it further reinforce that consent is unreasonably being withheld?/QUOTE]

      Not really, no, but if they do not come up with some good reasons for refusal they get close to unreasonably withholding consent..
      The reason that I suggested, the reduced premium was that I am wary of the legal costs of going to a county court to pursue a license to alter where we don't pay a premium and only pay the administrative costs.

      Is there not a risk that these costs could end up similar to any premium we would pay?

      This is what the Leasehold Advisory Service explained to us was a big risk of this.

      Comment


        #18
        Landlords and their advisers know they are in the driving seat and rely on leaseholders taking the line of least resistance. There are times when taking the line of least resistance is a sensible way forward, but I cannot see that volunteering to pay £5000 can in any way be justified.

        You have not said how long ago it was since you applied for consent. If it was fairly recently then I think you need to do some pressing before considering taking action. Have you put the law to them?

        Before you take any decision, perhaps we can go into what has been said so far. If the exchanges have been in writing, what has the landord or his agent said? If there is some indication that they will consent that may amount to actual consent. Please quote exact words.

        Comment


          #19
          I've sent you a DM as I'm not sure it's a good idea to post the correspondence here.

          Comment

          Latest Activity

          Collapse

          • Freeholder owns a number of leases, is this something to avoid?
            by phatfish
            I am buying a flat in a block of 11 where the landlord is a small company with two directors. One happens to be the owner of the lease i would take possession of.

            The other does not own any of the leases directly, but some family members own at least 4 of them (maybe one or two more, i...
            27-09-2020, 17:43 PM
          • Reply to Freeholder owns a number of leases, is this something to avoid?
            by Macromia
            All leaseholders should be treated equally and in accordance with the terms of the lease. Unfortunately this isn't always what happens.

            Hypothetically, you have the same protections where the freeholder is a company owned by leaseholders, and run by directors who have a controlling interest,...
            28-09-2020, 01:19 AM
          • LPE1 Questions
            by comm1985
            For the purposes of LPE1 could someone clarify the below:

            1. Slightly confused by the terms 'Managed Area' and 'Common Parts'. For a building of 4 standalone flats with no communal areas or entrances.

            a) I assume the "Managed Area" is the building containing the...
            27-09-2020, 18:28 PM
          • Reply to LPE1 Questions
            by Macromia
            Managed area will include the building and any grounds, gardens, outbuildings, etc., basically anything that the leaseholders may be required to contribute to the maintenance of via service charges.

            Common parts would include communal corridors, gardens, etc., and may also include parts...
            28-09-2020, 01:08 AM
          • management and maintenance costs for parking court
            by cooked
            sorry this may in the wrong forum but I could not see a forum title which was relevant
            my wife and I own (leasehold) two flats in a block of 3 flats
            each of the 3 flats has two parking spaces in a 30 space parking court
            in 2018, we became the RTM for the building but the parking court...
            25-09-2020, 22:30 PM
          • Reply to management and maintenance costs for parking court
            by Macromia
            Without knowing what your "parking court" is like, I would think that all of the charges that you list would likely be considered reasonable - apart from the management fees (personally I would consider the accountancy/audit charges to be of no value whatsoever to leaseholders, and therefore...
            28-09-2020, 00:53 AM
          • Reply to Freeholder owns a number of leases, is this something to avoid?
            by phatfish
            Hi Scot,

            Thanks for the reply. Yes i worded that badly, all i meant was the lease has a provision that states that all leaseholders are responsible for an equal share of a service charge and i have no reason to believe one lease is different from another.

            I did familiarize...
            27-09-2020, 20:52 PM
          • Reply to management and maintenance costs for parking court
            by cooked
            The fees charged to us for the parking court have risen slightly in the last few years and there was no reduction when we took over the management of the building.
            The management of the parking court remained with the original management company even though the management of the building itself...
            27-09-2020, 19:27 PM
          • Reply to Freeholder owns a number of leases, is this something to avoid?
            by scot22
            The Freeholder MUST abide by the lease and any leasehold ownership can be problematic. I doubt if you have to pay whatever is demanded. It would have to be expenditure justified by the lease and be reasonable.
            I suggest looking on the LEASE site where there is a wealth of information.
            27-09-2020, 18:25 PM
          • Reply to Responsibility of window frames
            by Macromia
            I would agree that it may be cheaper in the long run if the window frames are the responsibility of the leaseholder, but would not necessarily agree that a tribunal would say that the leaseholder is responsible for the frames.

            Especially if this was argued well, I think that it s more likely...
            27-09-2020, 18:06 PM
          Working...
          X