Lintel missing 1970 building

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Lintel missing 1970 building

    Should our service charges pay for a lintel above my replacement windows of my owned flat in 1970 block I am replacing old pvc windows at my cost and there is no lintel which i believe is now necessary for building regs Is this not part of structure of building ?

    #2
    Repairs to structure will normally come from service charge, who else would pay for your flat ?
    Are you sure there's no lintel - even stone age man put lintels in.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Section20z View Post
      ...
      Are you sure there's no lintel - even stone age man put lintels in.
      They didn't in my brother's house in Cheshire for a couple of windows, Edwardian I'd say.
      I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...

      Comment


        #4
        Must have had a magic brickie who laid the bricks over the apertures.

        Comment


          #5
          You should put one in just to make it safe for persons inside the flat. Some times the builders employ contract brick layers who "make do" without and don't bother to follow the regulations. A few years ago, the neighboring block of flats were found without wire ties between outer and inner brick walls.

          Comment

          Latest Activity

          Collapse

          • Reply to Section 61 and my Landlords rights for an order of possesion
            by andyg1
            Firstly than you for taking time to reply and i have typed out the demise 1. that i was concerned about . I can see i have mistakenly used the date 2050 rather than 2150 for the Section 61 for development . This seems now not be a concern . However what effect does the clause for the 12 months preceding...
            21-01-2022, 12:47 PM
          • Section 61 and my Landlords rights for an order of possesion
            by andyg1
            Hi All

            I wonder if anyone can set my mind to rest, i am the leaseholder of the flat in question . In 2008 i employed a firm of solicitors to extend my Lease . It was a 99 year lease granted in 1978 and it was eventually extended for an additional 90 years . During negotiations...
            20-01-2022, 16:35 PM
          • Reply to Section 61 and my Landlords rights for an order of possesion
            by andyg1
            In consideration of the sum of Nine Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds (£9750 ) receipt of which the Lessor herby acknowledges The Lessor with limited title guarantee demised to the Lessee the Premises To Hold the Premises to the Lessee for a term of 172 years from 25th March 1978 Together With...
            21-01-2022, 12:35 PM
          • Why would managing agent use S20 dispensation?
            by Flashback1966
            Have a flat in a block. The communal area is in very poor condition. Lighting not working for 15 years. Carpets worn out and threadbare. You can see the floorboard in places. Electrical cupboard door falling off.... Some residents leaving furniture in hallway.

            The managing agents applied...
            20-01-2022, 20:50 PM
          • Reply to Why would managing agent use S20 dispensation?
            by eagle2
            The reason should have been explained to you when the application was made and you should have had the opportunity to challenge the application. The Tribunal would have considered if there was any prejudice to the leaseholders and should have made any appropriate comments within its decision.
            21-01-2022, 06:21 AM
          • Are stopcocks responsibility of Lessee or Lessor
            by NaomiB
            Our flats were built in 1962. Some of the stopcocks are now seized up. Originally, the water came into the building and there was a stopcock for each flat in the cupboard in the communal area. It may confuse things a bit now because we have water meters for each flat outside. However, I wanted to...
            17-01-2022, 08:44 AM
          • Reply to Are stopcocks responsibility of Lessee or Lessor
            by nukecad
            You have a point, most of the cost for a small job like that is the plumbers call out charge, so it makes sense to only have the one call out.

            If it's just seized up then there are things you can try, it may sound odd but one of them is tightening the top nut and then slackening it again....
            21-01-2022, 05:59 AM
          • Reply to Are stopcocks responsibility of Lessee or Lessor
            by NaomiB
            It does make a difference if I have to pay, say, £130 for just my one whereas all nine could be done for not a lot more. I've passed it over to the residents' association to decide whether they want to go ahead or not. I'll spray mine with WD40 tomorrow!...
            20-01-2022, 23:27 PM
          • Reply to Are stopcocks responsibility of Lessee or Lessor
            by Flashback1966
            Whether it is paid out of service charge or by individual flat owner, it still comes out the same pocket!.

            However, given that you plan to sell you flat, the last thing you want is an uncontrolled water leak damaging your flat.

            it is better to get a job done at once. ...
            20-01-2022, 21:05 PM
          • Isn't there any obligation to be insured?
            by Sarah17
            Hi All,
            I recently bought a flat and learned since that the flat above is a regulated tenancy. The current tenant has moved in 1972. The flat is in a very shabby state, and I am worried about it (safety concerns, fire risk...etc). I wrote to the landlord and didn't receive any answer yet. A few...
            16-01-2022, 17:57 PM
          Working...
          X