Landlord breach of covenant

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Landlord breach of covenant

    Hi All, the directors and managing agent have through their actions breached the landlord own covenants and should not be benefitting from the breach. Do I take this to county court as I dont think this is within the FTT jurisdiction?

    #2
    I suggest that you apply to the FTT for reduction of annual service charge due to non-compliance to the lease or due failure to maintain your building. You can apply for reduction of service charge for past years if you have proof.

    Comment


      #3
      The FTT wont deal with it they say its not in their jurisdiction, the directors have induced the company to breach the lease so that the cost can not be challenged at FTT..its breach of contract!

      Comment


        #4
        I suggest you study the free guide of FTT jurisdiction and costs of application to the FTT . You can ask for a judgement on the reasonableness of the service charge.

        The LEASE website keeps records of past FTT judgements on service charges and you can search their data base for cases of servivice charge reduction..

        https://www.lease-advice.org/advice-...perty-chamber/

        Comment


          #5
          Thank you Gordon however the way the managing agent and directors have structured the deal...asking the leaseholders to pay a third party directly does not come under FTT I have studied cases online...in addition the directors and managing agent entered into contracts when the company had no money. They failed to collect service charges beforehand for the contracts

          Comment

          Latest Activity

          Collapse

          • Share of feehold/shared service charges?
            by Stu1020
            Hi there,

            I'm new to the forum and looking for advice on a sticky freehold situation.

            I own a two-bed flat in a converted building with two one-beds. The lease states that a fair proportion is payable towards the service charge. However, there has been a running agreement of...
            20-05-2022, 11:39 AM
          • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
            by eagle2
            I suggest that you ask the other 2 leaseholders to explain why they consider that the current allocation is fair. The freeholder has the right to review the allocation from time to time. Unfortunately, a "fair proportion" means that several alternatives would be considered reasonable to a...
            25-05-2022, 06:27 AM
          • RTM Hand Over Issues
            by martin15
            RTM handing over issues

            Our RTM companies comprise 4 blocks of 6 identical two bedroom flats and each block is registered at Companies House as a separate company.
            Following the acquisition date, it was discovered the former directors ignored legal advice and changed property management companies...
            23-05-2022, 19:36 PM
          • Reply to RTM Hand Over Issues
            by eagle2
            You appear to have a claim against the freeholder, not the individual companies, who are acting as agent for the freeholder. A Tribunal does not have the jurisdiction to deal with monies which should be handed over, it is a matter for the courts,
            25-05-2022, 06:16 AM
          • Old managing agents accounts
            by jazzythumper
            Since obtaining the RTM and changing the managing agent, we have never been given full accounts / receipts for the previous year(s). We believe that as the old freeholder and leaser holder of one of the flats were represented by the same solicitor that prior to the sale of the freehold, we were subsidising...
            20-05-2022, 11:21 AM
          • Reply to Old managing agents accounts
            by eagle2
            You do not appear to hold sufficient information to make a claim against the freeholder at this stage. I suggest that you apply to the FTT to challenge the charges. You would then be able to ask the Tribunal to direct the freeholder to disclose further information....
            25-05-2022, 06:06 AM
          • Reply to S20 - Quotes not valid for long enough for 30 day consult
            by Macromia
            With just two properties involved, and you being a resident, your best option would probably be to agree a time to talk through the proposed work and the need to skip the full 30 days that are supposed to be allowed for each stage of consultation.
            If the other leaseholder has any major concerns,...
            25-05-2022, 02:52 AM
          • S20 - Quotes not valid for long enough for 30 day consult
            by Flatman78
            Hi LZ Community

            Just wondering if anyone's had/having any issues with S20 and allowing leaseholder 30 days to review estimates, raise concerns etc.

            Building material prices have fluctuated massively since covid and brexit.
            with a combination of Brexit, impact from russia/ukraine...
            23-05-2022, 14:42 PM
          • Reply to Section 20
            by Macromia
            This really doesn't help at all.

            In what was does the driveway partially belong to the freeholder and partially to the leaseholder?
            Are you saying that part of the driveway is demised to this leaseholder and part is undemised and therefore a common area? Or does the freeholder have...
            25-05-2022, 02:39 AM
          • Reply to Freehold confusion
            by sgclacy
            Your friend may not have to have his ID confirmed as the consideration will be far less than £5,000 and if he did form ID5 makes life a lot easier as it can be done via a video link...
            24-05-2022, 19:59 PM
          Working...
          X