RTM Insurance Claims

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    RTM Insurance Claims

    Hi

    An RTM Co organises the building insurance in a large block where the premium is paid equally by all leaseholders. The RTM Co does NOT include all leaseholders, nor does it include the freeholder.

    Should insurance claims be discussed, disclosed or agreed with all leaseholders and/or the freeholder ? Or can the RTM Co manage all claims without transparency ?

    Ta


    #2
    Well pretty much nothing about the management of the leaseholder-freeholder relationship is "transparent", "agreed", "discussed" or "disclosed" - so not sure why you expect this to be different. RTM is often the nightmare version of the scenario - often much worse than management by an external freeholder when things go wrong.

    What is the exact problem of which you are distressing?

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by grazbo View Post
      Hi
      The RTM Co does NOT include all leaseholders, nor does it include the freeholder.
      But the buildings insurance DOES.
      The insurance covers all the building. and it's the freeholders building.

      If you have to make a claim, not everyone needs to know about it, depending on the claim.

      Tree branch falls on next doors car and claim is made and payment made.
      Underground drains crack / grass roots block. You make a claim if covered.
      Leaseholders cover their own flat for breakages, theft / fire and leaks.

      S wha is the problem, if any ?

      The rtm management decide on the insurance policy ( usually a standard "Blocks of flats policy ).
      That is why it's called a "Right to manage".

      Comment


        #4
        Thanks ram and AndrewDod , to add some context; I am suspicious about a number of insurance claims. I am not the claimant - rather, each claim was made by a director of the RTMCo.

        At best, this may be taking advantage of the situation, where directors of the RTMCo make claims against the insurance whenever it suits, always based on issues regarding their respective flats. If issues arise with a property that belongs to a director of the RTMCo, a claim is registered and monies are received, without any communication to L/Hs or F/Hs.

        There appears to be no paper or email trail available. There is no way to verify the validity of any issue or the value of the claim. The first anyone outside of the RTMCo knows is when the insurance premium increases.

        At worst, it may be fraudulent, where an individual director exploits the freedom to make claims without recourse, and makes up a random claim value (higher than the actual cost to rectify)

        Ethically I presumed that each claim would be transparent to L/H and F/H - or at least as a minimum, there would be an "audit" trail managed by the RTMCo which could be requested by the F/H and other L/Hs.

        From another perspective, maybe the question is : how can an RTMCo (and its directors) be held to account for claims made to an insurance company ?

        Comment


          #5
          It is a common scenario - theft by dominant RTM participants or majority owner Directors of RMCs. Unfortunately there are few if any feasibly actionable legal protections either under Company Law or Leasehold law. Whatever you do you are in a cleft stick. You could report potentially fraudulent claims to the insurers - but you will end up paying a higher price for insurance. Or you could sue yourself. Or you could apply to the FTT to have a manager appointed which will cost you a lot in high management fees (and many FTT appointed managers are outright crooks and opportunists too) -- but fiddling the insurance and common types of cheating may not reach the bar for FTT appointment - so it depends what other management malfunction exists.

          I have no doubt what you feel is happening is probably happening. Figuring out what to do about it is trickier.

          Comment

          Latest Activity

          Collapse

          • Freeholder/Agent Demanding Money for Repairs
            by SSLA91
            Hi all,

            Long time lurker of this forum and recent new member. Have always found the forum incredibly helpful so thank you! Have now got an issue with our freeholder that I could use some specific advice on (have tried searching for similar posts but to no avail).

            We have recently...
            20-10-2021, 20:28 PM
          • Reply to Freeholder/Agent Demanding Money for Repairs
            by eagle2
            It makes you wonder why any freeholder should comply with s20 at all. As you say, it can wait to see if any leaseholder challenges the costs. It does not even need to explain why it did not comply with s20, the only consideration appears to be whether or not the leaseholders suffered any financial prejudice,...
            23-10-2021, 06:34 AM
          • Section 20 notice
            by Starlane
            Hello I would welcome input on the following:
            Two roofs feed into a valley, the valley is in need of repair, this is a shared responsibility and therefore a shared cost. so how do we issue a section 20 notice when really we need the consent and agreement from two different buildings/landlords...
            22-10-2021, 19:09 PM
          • Reply to Section 20 notice
            by Starlane
            Hi Macromia thank you as always for your helpful and sensible input.. one building is saying one thing and another building the other, the usual chinese whispers so I took the bull by the horns and spoke to everyone and I am almost there apart from a Director who wants to do their own thing ( not being...
            22-10-2021, 20:57 PM
          • Reply to Share of freehold questions - confused
            by Starlane
            Agree thank you...
            22-10-2021, 20:52 PM
          • Share of freehold questions - confused
            by sixunforced
            Not sure if this is the right place for this query but anyway, I'm a first time buyer and have been searching for a property for like two years now (not continuously but on and off and obv covid halted my search for a while). I found a really nice 2 bedroom flat for under £320,000 in a block of around...
            18-11-2020, 21:19 PM
          • Reply to Section 20 notice
            by Macromia
            Assuming that the two freeholders have agreed that they will work together and share the costs, they jointly agree what needs to be communicated to the leaseholders and then each freeholder writes to the leaseholders in their building.
            22-10-2021, 20:16 PM
          • Reply to Freeholder threatening to cut water off
            by Macromia
            This is possibly by far the most important consideration, in my opinion.
            If the OP's lease doesn't allow 'improvements' to be charged to service charges, the freeholder cannot require them to contribute anything towards the costs, and would therefore be something that they would have had no choice...
            22-10-2021, 20:08 PM
          • Freeholder threatening to cut water off
            by Disraeli-LLH
            I was hoping you would be able to help. We own a ground floor flat LLH(970 yrs remaining). The freeholder owns the house and lets the flat upstairs on an AST.

            The freeholder currently undertaking works including replumbing. We have been on a shared water supply and we connect through their...
            20-10-2021, 15:35 PM
          • Reply to Freeholder/Agent Demanding Money for Repairs
            by Macromia
            Possibly...

            Although when my freeholder applied for dispensation a while back (arguing that the proposed work had to be carried out as a matter of urgency) they were granted dispensation with the First Tier Tribunal commenting that the 2013 Supreme Court Case of Daejan versus Benson meant...
            22-10-2021, 19:51 PM
          Working...
          X