Which has more sway the lease or the article of associaton

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Which has more sway the lease or the article of associaton

    Just getting ready for the meeting tomorrow. One question I would like to ask so that I am prepared.

    In the AofA it does say that a resolution can be passed but does a vote for something which is not on the lease actually.

    What is more important the lease or the AofA. Is the lease the most important of the two or can a resolution outweigh what it says in the lease.

    The Lease. A company is treated as a person in law. That person is contracted to obey the lease. Any leaseholder, whether or not a member of the company, could successfully sue the company if they suffer as the result of a breach of the lease by the company.

    Similarly, the company is person that has to obey landlord and tenant law.

    It is a common misunderstanding that owning a share of the freehold absolves you from complying with the lease.

    Note the legal position would be no different from a breach of any other contract that was authorised by a general meeting, except that the other party wouldn't be the same natural person wearing a different hat.


      Actually, strictly speaking, they have the same same sway, as they are both contracts.


        Whilst it is legally binding to follow them it does not give authority to alter the lease which is another legally binding contract. The lease is by deed. Does that have any effect ?


          Originally posted by scot22 View Post
          The lease is by deed. Does that have any effect ?
          No, a deed is just a specific type of contract.
          It doesn't make it more or less important.

          When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
          Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).


            Originally posted by leaseholder64 View Post
            The Lease. ... It is a common misunderstanding that owning a share of the freehold absolves you from complying with the lease.
            Spot on as ever. Leaseholders are still leaseholders. Always. If they hold the freehold they could vote to extend their leases and even by sheer folly remove the ground rent for members of the company, but they cannot tear up all the provisions because a lease is a mutual benefit contract, and if you read the Deed it should say this clearly ... Lessee of this lease hereby covenants until death or thereafter to obey for the mutual protection of the Lessor and the other Lessees of said Gaff to obey all the covenants in this lease...blah blah.

            Otherwise they might vote to spend the service charge on a cruise.
            Do not read my offerings, based purely on my research or experience as a lessee, as legal advice. If you need legal advice please see a solicitor.


              Well that is all very helpful gentlemen. Yes we did agree to extend the lease but that was agreed with the proviso that we changed the lease so that it was readable and workable. At the moment despite size everyone pays a one six share of the drains, roof, shared areas such as garden. However when it comes to the outside decoration Leaseholders are expected to paint the outside of their flat themselves which is a bit awkward. Not for me as mine is a garden flat but for others who need scaffolding. However I Have agreed to have the decorations done altogether but they expect me to pay a one sixth even when the LVD said my share was a one eighth. However we are not moving forward on this so unless I agree the work is not gong to get done and I have water coming into my flat through the render. Penetrative damp.

              The other thing is that my share to put in a sinking fund cannot be one six. However I will pay it as long as it isnt too high, but I have a feeling the MA is going to ask for a whole lot more. However there is no sinking or reserve fund in the lease and that was one of the things I wanted changing as well as the lease to be more clear about the decorations.

              So thank you for all your help. Much appreciated.


              Latest Activity


              • Reply to Converting front garden into a driveway.
                by Section20z
                I think paving could be argued to be a normal use of a garden, (bearing in mind it will need to be permeable anyway for building regs) If the other 2 flats aren't going to complain then I'd be inclined to just do it.
                What's the worst that can happen.......
                31-03-2020, 21:39 PM
              • Converting front garden into a driveway.
                by ForumFirstTimer

                I purchased my ground floor flat last year, its a converted house with 3 flats in. It has a small front garden which is 100% mine within the lease, but it is large enough that it would fit a car on it.

                The 'Garden' right now it just patchy weeds.

                My question...
                30-03-2020, 15:09 PM
              • Sole Director
                by Stacker
                Hope you are all healthy and safe!....our AOA state that a quorum is required. The sole director has appointed another director, without one shareholder knowing about the meeting my question is would the meeting have been quorate and could the company secretary act ( one they hire not a member) be part...
                29-03-2020, 10:41 AM
              • Reply to Sole Director
                by Stacker
                The articles clearly sate no decisions to be taken unless the meeting is quorate meaning directors - the board, the same for shareholder meetings. A sole director can impose his sole authority if he is the only shareholder however the company has AOA which clearly state all meetings are to be quorate...otherwise...
                31-03-2020, 12:55 PM
              • Reply to Sole Director
                by Stacker
                Sorry leaseholder 64 that is wrong...
                31-03-2020, 12:51 PM
              • Reply to Converting front garden into a driveway.
                by Lawcruncher
                They may not "need" payment. It depends on what the lease says. There are three possibiities:

                ┬Ě The lease says nothing about making alterations or additions or. if it does, the changes you propose are not covered. In that case you can go ahead without asking the landlord....
                31-03-2020, 08:37 AM
              • Recourse for work we paid out based on freeholder's incorrect advice
                by eshroom
                When my mum bought her flat exactly 5 years ago, she discovered an issue with the buildings wast pipe, which was under her basement flat. It had been leaking and caused a foul smell.

                She informed the freeholder of the urgent drain issue and they said it was not something for them to investigate...
                30-03-2020, 21:50 PM
              • Reply to Converting front garden into a driveway.
                by ForumFirstTimer
                thanks for your reply.

                What would they specifically need payment for? The fact that it's going to be used as a driveway or because I am changing the front garden from grass (solid and weeds) to paving?

                30-03-2020, 21:11 PM
              • Reply to Converting front garden into a driveway.
                by nukecad
                You would need the freeholders permission for a start, and if they allow you then they will probably want payment for that.
                30-03-2020, 19:50 PM
              • Pansies before people
                by D P Dance
                The managing agents of one of my rental properties, who have been vilified on Trust Pilot, when asked if they are considering relief for landlords whose tenants have defaulted on their rent have refused point blank to consider offer help and have told me I quote

                .. you need to accept the...
                24-03-2020, 13:24 PM