Reasonable for Directors to refuse consent in a conservation area?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Reasonable for Directors to refuse consent in a conservation area?


    So the Directors of our Freeholders Association (Mansion Block with Freehold owned by Leaseholders), have now discovered that one leaseholder has:

    - taken out a support wall between the living room and main bedroom, to push the wall back and turn the living room into a kitchen (so now with wooden floors & a kitchen above the below flat's living room)
    - made a section of a back bedroom into a third shower room, with shower, sink and WC all going through a macerator that sits on the floor with no insulation for noise for the below flat's bedroom.
    -threaded the new waste pipe through the ceilings of the below flat's kitchen, and 2nd bedroom, exiting through their window lintel.

    All this was done without permission. The local buildings control/council also were not notified. A local surveyor looked over the works and it took 2 years to correct all the bad and shoddy works (including leaks into the below flat and noise issues from the macerator), but no official building or official surveyor signed off on any of it.

    The Directors at the time granted leases, as they said they were told they could "not reasonably withhold consent". And now too much time seems to have passed to rescind the lease.

    Are the Directors liable for allowing bad works, ongoing noise issues for the below flat, change of use of wet-above-dry rooms, the new use of the flat being 3 bedsits with multiple occupancy use of the kitchen above a living room - causing sound issues in the below living room, and back bedroom from the third bathroom?

    The mansion flats are Edwardian and in a conservation area. It used to be a listed building but I believe is no longer. The lease stipulates no noise nuisance or leaks effluence, floors to be carpeted, and permissions to alter to be sought. All of these terms have been breached. ..?

    I believe it is quite difficult for a company's members to sue its directors. The correct course of action is to vote the directors out of office.

    If this happened some time ago, the directors' appointments have probably been re-ratified, which would, I think constitute ratifying any questionable decisions they had made.

    To successfully sue, I think you would have to replace them, then the new board prove they were operating outside their authority, or deliberately operating against the interests of the company. They are only required to operate to the level of competence they actually possess; it is up to the members to ensure only competent people get appointed.


      The phrase in unreasonably refuse, not reasonably refuse.

      I don't understand why they were granting leases. Surely the lease already existed, and only licence to alter was required?

      It is reasonable to refuse if no building notice has been issued.

      It is reasonable to refuse if not structural engineering calculations have been provided.

      It is reasonable to refuse if the leaseholder won't pay for the freeholder's surveyor to approve the work.

      It is probably reasonable to refuse if the modification would result in a nuisance to other flats.


        Thanks Leaseholder. Very helpful


        Latest Activity


        • Reply to Section 20
          by Anna1985
          Macromia , yes part of driveway demised to LL and part not demised to anyone.

          According to lease the LL should his part to keep and maintain the said area edged bla in a neat and tidy condition and further to keep and maintain the fences belonging thereto in a good state of repair....
          26-05-2022, 20:46 PM
        • Section 20
          by Anna1985
          So the lease allows for the property to be kept in good condition.
          Thus, the shared hall could be spruced up no problem, but there is an issue with driveway - partially it belongs to the freeholder, partially to the ground floor leaseholder - it is made out of the old paving stones, it looks...
          22-05-2022, 21:03 PM
        • 2-1 transfer - what does Freeholder do?
          by Flashback1966
          I am a Freeholder. Have a flat there too. I have received an email from the leaseholder's soclitors acting for Mr A. They are doing a 2-1 transfer from the names of Mr A and Ms B to just Mr.

          The solicitors want to know the requirements on completion.

          Is is just a notice of...
          26-05-2022, 18:46 PM
        • Reply to 2-1 transfer - what does Freeholder do?
          by sgclacy
          In addition to the notices sometime the lease may require a deed of covenant and therefore you may need to prepare a deed of Covenant

          If there are any arrears these must be settled on completion...
          26-05-2022, 20:27 PM
        • Reply to 2-1 transfer - what does Freeholder do?
          by Lawcruncher
          What does the lease say?

          You do not need confirmation from Mrs B.
          26-05-2022, 20:27 PM
        • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
          by Flashback1966
          The other flats are demanding I pay 38% of costs to extend leases when the freehold itself, a very comparable legal procedure, was calculated on an equal third share.

          Confused. Did you extend the lease or buy the Frehold?

          In my opinion, if the Freehold was purchased, it should...
          26-05-2022, 17:49 PM
        • Share of feehold/shared service charges?
          by Stu1020
          Hi there,

          I'm new to the forum and looking for advice on a sticky freehold situation.

          I own a two-bed flat in a converted building with two one-beds. The lease states that a fair proportion is payable towards the service charge. However, there has been a running agreement of...
          20-05-2022, 11:39 AM
        • Reply to S20 - Quotes not valid for long enough for 30 day consult
          by Gordon999
          If the review is just between 2 flats, calling a meeting with upstairs leaseholder , to review quotations and decide which one to accept will be quicker than waiting for 30 days. With inflation around 10% p.a , the parties at the meeting could choose to accept a quotation at 2.5% higher than a...
          26-05-2022, 14:20 PM
        • Reply to Old managing agents accounts
          by jazzythumper
          Does it matter that it has been more than six months since the RTM took control? Does it matter than the freeholder who I would like to see these accounts from sold the freehold more than 6months ago? Is there a standard template or form I could use to write to the previous freeholder?

          26-05-2022, 11:26 AM
        • Old managing agents accounts
          by jazzythumper
          Since obtaining the RTM and changing the managing agent, we have never been given full accounts / receipts for the previous year(s). We believe that as the old freeholder and leaser holder of one of the flats were represented by the same solicitor that prior to the sale of the freehold, we were subsidising...
          20-05-2022, 11:21 AM