Reasonable for Directors to refuse consent in a conservation area?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Reasonable for Directors to refuse consent in a conservation area?


    So the Directors of our Freeholders Association (Mansion Block with Freehold owned by Leaseholders), have now discovered that one leaseholder has:

    - taken out a support wall between the living room and main bedroom, to push the wall back and turn the living room into a kitchen (so now with wooden floors & a kitchen above the below flat's living room)
    - made a section of a back bedroom into a third shower room, with shower, sink and WC all going through a macerator that sits on the floor with no insulation for noise for the below flat's bedroom.
    -threaded the new waste pipe through the ceilings of the below flat's kitchen, and 2nd bedroom, exiting through their window lintel.

    All this was done without permission. The local buildings control/council also were not notified. A local surveyor looked over the works and it took 2 years to correct all the bad and shoddy works (including leaks into the below flat and noise issues from the macerator), but no official building or official surveyor signed off on any of it.

    The Directors at the time granted leases, as they said they were told they could "not reasonably withhold consent". And now too much time seems to have passed to rescind the lease.

    Are the Directors liable for allowing bad works, ongoing noise issues for the below flat, change of use of wet-above-dry rooms, the new use of the flat being 3 bedsits with multiple occupancy use of the kitchen above a living room - causing sound issues in the below living room, and back bedroom from the third bathroom?

    The mansion flats are Edwardian and in a conservation area. It used to be a listed building but I believe is no longer. The lease stipulates no noise nuisance or leaks effluence, floors to be carpeted, and permissions to alter to be sought. All of these terms have been breached. ..?

    I believe it is quite difficult for a company's members to sue its directors. The correct course of action is to vote the directors out of office.

    If this happened some time ago, the directors' appointments have probably been re-ratified, which would, I think constitute ratifying any questionable decisions they had made.

    To successfully sue, I think you would have to replace them, then the new board prove they were operating outside their authority, or deliberately operating against the interests of the company. They are only required to operate to the level of competence they actually possess; it is up to the members to ensure only competent people get appointed.


      The phrase in unreasonably refuse, not reasonably refuse.

      I don't understand why they were granting leases. Surely the lease already existed, and only licence to alter was required?

      It is reasonable to refuse if no building notice has been issued.

      It is reasonable to refuse if not structural engineering calculations have been provided.

      It is reasonable to refuse if the leaseholder won't pay for the freeholder's surveyor to approve the work.

      It is probably reasonable to refuse if the modification would result in a nuisance to other flats.


        Thanks Leaseholder. Very helpful


        Latest Activity


        • Reply to AGM cancelled.
          by eagle2
          Any meeting which you decide to hold will be an informal meeting only, you do need to follow the correct procedure if you wish to hold a valid meeting,

          The Articles should state whether or not directors need to declare conflicts of interest and whether or not they are entitled to vote on...
          26-01-2022, 13:30 PM
        • AGM cancelled.
          by Grumio
          Is this legal?

          A bit of background, we currently have three directors, we are allowed to have up to a maximum of eight directors according to the articles of association. We are all leaseholders. Last summer the three directors decided to hire a managing agent who is now in charge of the...
          26-01-2022, 00:46 AM
        • Reply to AGM cancelled.
          by Grumio
          It is both a managing agent and a residence Association. But we want to go back to managing the block ourselves.

          Thanks for the reply, yes invitations have been sent to all our members. And I agree, they should not cancel the AGM, especially when they haven’t got a plausible reason to...
          26-01-2022, 12:12 PM
        • Reply to Lease extension triggers doubling ground rent change
          by sgclacy
          Doubling every 25 years is simply a guess as to what inflation may be, if inflation of the current levels ( about 6% ) was to continue the real value of the rent would fall by 77% and doubling would not address the enormous damage done by inflation. However, if inflation was less than 2.81% per annum...
          26-01-2022, 11:57 AM
        • Reply to Lease extension triggers doubling ground rent change
          by Section20z
          You are clearly using the informal route and can thus negotiate whatever terms you like.
          freeholder will want to retain some ground rent but avoid the doubling clause, maybe suggest small fixed rises every ten years....
          26-01-2022, 10:40 AM
        • Reply to Service charges according to floorspace vs lease stipulation
          by Section20z
          Quite, there is also the question here of who the actual freeholder is and whether the whole thing is any concern of the OP who only ever need pay 25% !!...
          26-01-2022, 10:25 AM
        • Service charges according to floorspace vs lease stipulation
          by Santa Fe
          Hello. I own a flat in a block of four. The new owner of the smallest flat is disputing their contribution to service charges based on floor size. All four flats have historically paid 25% each, but of the four leases only mine states that I pay 25%. I have spoken with a solicitor about this and he...
          24-01-2022, 22:55 PM
        • Reply to AGM cancelled.
          by eagle2
          Yes, I am confused too. If there is a Residents Association, it is required to comply with its constitution.

          There seems to be a Company involved as well. Whether or not it is required to hold an AGM depends on its Articles, AGMs can be cancelled for various reasons, lockdowns are an example,...
          26-01-2022, 10:19 AM
        • Reply to Service charges according to floorspace vs lease stipulation
          by eagle2
          I think that we have found 3 possible alternatives already and no doubt we could find more, As Section20z says it is very rare for a court or a tribunal to intervene, The lease appears to allow the freeholder (?) to decide what is fair and reasonable and it has decided that an equal share is reasonable,...
          26-01-2022, 10:01 AM
        • Reply to AGM cancelled.
          by fos333
          Is this a Residence Association or Residents Management Company?

          Had invitations to the AGM been sent out to all members? If invitations had been issued then no the AGM should not have been cancelled.

          If the 2 directors are "good friends of the managing agent" they...
          26-01-2022, 10:00 AM