Undisclosed Major Works

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Undisclosed Major Works

    Hi all

    I'm hoping to get some guidance on whether there is a requirement for a Freeholder to disclose forthcoming Major Works to a purchaser of a leasehold flat.

    My wife and completed on a Leasehold flat in January 2015 with the process having begun the purchase process in late October 2014. The freeholder is a local council. During that process our "pre assignment pack" provided to our solicitor suggested future works for 5 years totalling approximately £5,000 which we were fine with.

    Roughly 7 months after moving in we were given an S20 that started at £6,500 and was then increased shortly after to £12,500. The work was completed over 18 months ago now and whilst we still haven't had a final bill the last S20b we received is suggesting the cost will be in excess of £25,500.

    I have recently been given a survey report commissioned by the council from April 2014 specifying the exact works which were then carried out, albeit priced at a quarter of what they have spiralled to (a separate issue).

    Whilst we are very happy to contribute to works as Leaseholders, we feel that the Freeholder should have informed us of these works as we would obviously have factored it into our purchase price. They are claiming it was emergency works despite the surveys.

    What is the legal situation on disclosure of this type of information as my understanding is that we have suffered a material loss of approximately £20,000 as we expected £5,000 of major works in the first 5 years based on their disclosure.

    Thanks for you advice.

    #2
    They told you they were a council. That pretty much implies there will be large major works bills at short notice.

    Where they asked about major works?

    Did they actually know they were needed at the time they were asked?

    Comment


      #3
      Hi Leaseholder64

      Thanks for the reply. We bought in full knowledge that it was a council and how much impact they can have. Our solicitor did ask about upcoming major works which they put at £5,000 for the next 5 years and unrelated to any of the works since carried out.

      I now have a report, from the council, from 7 months prior to beginning the purchase process that shows they were aware that the works now carried out were required and the costings, and this was not disclosed at the time.

      Comment


        #4
        I thought there was a limit set at £15,000 for Councils charges by Housing secretary Pickles ..

        https://www.lease-advice.org/faq/my-...-can-be-asked/

        Comment


          #5
          No they do not have to disclose anything. You should have factored the major downsides of purchasing a leasehold property into the price (basically the potential for theft and scamming). The fact that it is a council, makes it doubly so.

          Comment


            #6
            AndrewDod may not be correct. Firstly councils are susceptible to Judicial Review JR on various grounds one of which is legitimate expectation. There may be a basis for a claim for breach of that doctrine and a good direct access land law and public law barrister should have a look at it, but only if there is evidence that they had knowledge of the forthcoming s20 and if they had a duty to disclose it.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Jon66 View Post
              AndrewDod may not be correct. Firstly councils are susceptible to Judicial Review JR on various grounds one of which is legitimate expectation. There may be a basis for a claim for breach of that doctrine and a good direct access land law and public law barrister should have a look at it, but only if there is evidence that they had knowledge of the forthcoming s20 and if they had a duty to disclose it.
              Since there is no law relating to whether the freeholder has to respond to a potential buyer at all (about anything) there won't be any law relating to how they have to respond - and in any case the only obligations they have is to the lease (and there is no law to state that they have to provide a projection of future costs in future years to the person involved in that contract - the lessee - let alone a third party.

              Yes it would be nice if one could easily deal with freeholder/leaseholder issue. But it's not nice. The precise purpose of the law (what it contains, what it does not contain, and how existing law can be implemented) is to facilitate theft and extraction of money. Judicial review of a corrupt system will be a waste of time. The purpose of JR is to examine whether legislative and executive branches are exceeding their authority - this sort of money extraction is legally sanctioned and smoothed over.

              Comment


                #8
                The point is the council misled the buyer, which is governed by public law.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Jon66 View Post
                  The point is the council misled the buyer, which is governed by public law.
                  They didn't. The original S20 was around what they stated. And then it spiralled out of control (which is what Councils do after various layers of ineptness, non-caring and backhanders). They were not able to predict that they would be inept, non-caring and corrupt.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    It's unclear. Op asks the question 'should he have been informed of the works', inferring they had not been so informed, but earlier in his post says he was informed of works but the costs spiralled. Perhaps AlexT would like to come back to us and clarify the point.

                    Comment

                    Latest Activity

                    Collapse

                    • Reply to Service charges according to floorspace vs lease stipulation
                      by sgclacy
                      So the new lessee who wishes to challenge the proportion would have seen BEFORE he purchased the flat what percentage he was to pay - the unfairness of the bargain was patently clear BEFORE he purchased and may we’ll have been reflected in the price paid for the flat. So notwithstanding all of that...
                      28-01-2022, 22:45 PM
                    • Water Leaks Again and Again and Again...
                      by bigalxyz
                      Director of RMC - 11 flats in London
                      There seems to be a long standing problem with the plumbing in the bathroom of one of the flats. 4 water leaks in the last 18 months, causing damage to the flat below.

                      Is there anything the RMC can do to compel the leaseholder of the problem flat...
                      28-01-2022, 16:05 PM
                    • Reply to Water Leaks Again and Again and Again...
                      by bigalxyz
                      There's no single cause - there have been multiple leaks - each time a different cause. Blocked bath overflow, leaking washing machine hose, leaking toilet cistern inlet, failed balloon valve in toilet, shower screen not fitted properly...all kinds of things. Just general neglect. Owner's never there,...
                      28-01-2022, 22:32 PM
                    • Reply to Water Leaks Again and Again and Again...
                      by bigalxyz
                      Thank you.

                      I plan to leaf through the lease at the weekend - there may well be clauses along the lines that you suggest (it does ring a bell). Also I do know that there's a clause along the lines of "leaseholders mustn't do anything to mess up the insurance of the building, and are...
                      28-01-2022, 22:30 PM
                    • Reply to Water Leaks Again and Again and Again...
                      by Macromia
                      What it says in the lease is mostly what you have to rely on. I would be looking for any clauses that the flat needs to be kept in a good state of repair, and in particular anything that mentions keeping the pipes that serve the flat in a good state of repair and replaced when necessary and anything...
                      28-01-2022, 20:53 PM
                    • Reply to Licenced Garage
                      by Pariah81
                      We have around 5 individual garages and another garage with 3 parking spaces (I refer to that as the communal garage). Each parking space in the communal garage is allocated to a specific flat.

                      Whilst the document tries to convey it is assigned on licence, from the case law I have read,...
                      28-01-2022, 20:41 PM
                    • Reply to Service charges according to floorspace vs lease stipulation
                      by Macromia
                      If three out of four leaseholders, where all four share the freehold, stand together in opposition against the fourth, that is by definition the three 'ganging up' against the fourth. The fact that the same system may have been in use previously, and may even have been willingly accepted by previous...
                      28-01-2022, 20:39 PM
                    • 87 Years left on Lease - Cant buy freehold until 2 years?
                      by pt888
                      A property recently came back onto the market for the reason being that the previous buyer was unable to lend money from his bank due to the lease only having 87 years remaining, the estate agent therefore said that going forward only cash-buyers would be considered. Out of those cash buyers i was selected....
                      28-01-2022, 20:38 PM
                    • Reply to Water Leaks Again and Again and Again...
                      by Gordon999
                      You need to inspect the bathroom and determine the cause of water ingress to flat below . If there is a shower head , the water spray may fall into the gap between the bath and wall. If there is no shower spray, the pipes under the bath may be loose .??

                      If the bath user forgets...
                      28-01-2022, 20:22 PM
                    • Who owns loft space when it is not stated in lease.
                      by vagabond
                      Hi, I own a top floor maisonette and share the freehold 50/50 with the ground floor maisonette. I would like to build a loft conversion and after checking my lease I'm unsure who the loft space belongs to. All I can see in my lease is "the right for the lessor/owner/occupier of lower maisonette...
                      21-01-2022, 14:45 PM
                    Working...
                    X