Undisclosed Major Works

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Undisclosed Major Works

    Hi all

    I'm hoping to get some guidance on whether there is a requirement for a Freeholder to disclose forthcoming Major Works to a purchaser of a leasehold flat.

    My wife and completed on a Leasehold flat in January 2015 with the process having begun the purchase process in late October 2014. The freeholder is a local council. During that process our "pre assignment pack" provided to our solicitor suggested future works for 5 years totalling approximately £5,000 which we were fine with.

    Roughly 7 months after moving in we were given an S20 that started at £6,500 and was then increased shortly after to £12,500. The work was completed over 18 months ago now and whilst we still haven't had a final bill the last S20b we received is suggesting the cost will be in excess of £25,500.

    I have recently been given a survey report commissioned by the council from April 2014 specifying the exact works which were then carried out, albeit priced at a quarter of what they have spiralled to (a separate issue).

    Whilst we are very happy to contribute to works as Leaseholders, we feel that the Freeholder should have informed us of these works as we would obviously have factored it into our purchase price. They are claiming it was emergency works despite the surveys.

    What is the legal situation on disclosure of this type of information as my understanding is that we have suffered a material loss of approximately £20,000 as we expected £5,000 of major works in the first 5 years based on their disclosure.

    Thanks for you advice.

    #2
    They told you they were a council. That pretty much implies there will be large major works bills at short notice.

    Where they asked about major works?

    Did they actually know they were needed at the time they were asked?

    Comment


      #3
      Hi Leaseholder64

      Thanks for the reply. We bought in full knowledge that it was a council and how much impact they can have. Our solicitor did ask about upcoming major works which they put at £5,000 for the next 5 years and unrelated to any of the works since carried out.

      I now have a report, from the council, from 7 months prior to beginning the purchase process that shows they were aware that the works now carried out were required and the costings, and this was not disclosed at the time.

      Comment


        #4
        I thought there was a limit set at £15,000 for Councils charges by Housing secretary Pickles ..

        https://www.lease-advice.org/faq/my-...-can-be-asked/

        Comment


          #5
          No they do not have to disclose anything. You should have factored the major downsides of purchasing a leasehold property into the price (basically the potential for theft and scamming). The fact that it is a council, makes it doubly so.

          Comment


            #6
            AndrewDod may not be correct. Firstly councils are susceptible to Judicial Review JR on various grounds one of which is legitimate expectation. There may be a basis for a claim for breach of that doctrine and a good direct access land law and public law barrister should have a look at it, but only if there is evidence that they had knowledge of the forthcoming s20 and if they had a duty to disclose it.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Jon66 View Post
              AndrewDod may not be correct. Firstly councils are susceptible to Judicial Review JR on various grounds one of which is legitimate expectation. There may be a basis for a claim for breach of that doctrine and a good direct access land law and public law barrister should have a look at it, but only if there is evidence that they had knowledge of the forthcoming s20 and if they had a duty to disclose it.
              Since there is no law relating to whether the freeholder has to respond to a potential buyer at all (about anything) there won't be any law relating to how they have to respond - and in any case the only obligations they have is to the lease (and there is no law to state that they have to provide a projection of future costs in future years to the person involved in that contract - the lessee - let alone a third party.

              Yes it would be nice if one could easily deal with freeholder/leaseholder issue. But it's not nice. The precise purpose of the law (what it contains, what it does not contain, and how existing law can be implemented) is to facilitate theft and extraction of money. Judicial review of a corrupt system will be a waste of time. The purpose of JR is to examine whether legislative and executive branches are exceeding their authority - this sort of money extraction is legally sanctioned and smoothed over.

              Comment


                #8
                The point is the council misled the buyer, which is governed by public law.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Jon66 View Post
                  The point is the council misled the buyer, which is governed by public law.
                  They didn't. The original S20 was around what they stated. And then it spiralled out of control (which is what Councils do after various layers of ineptness, non-caring and backhanders). They were not able to predict that they would be inept, non-caring and corrupt.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    It's unclear. Op asks the question 'should he have been informed of the works', inferring they had not been so informed, but earlier in his post says he was informed of works but the costs spiralled. Perhaps AlexT would like to come back to us and clarify the point.

                    Comment

                    Latest Activity

                    Collapse

                    • Freeholder demanding a premium
                      by Disraeli-LLH
                      We have a 1 bed ground floor flat with c.970 years left. Our lease stipulates that we have to get written consent to make any alterations or additions to the premises.
                      We are looking to do some works to our 1 bed flat. This includes relocating the kitchen which will create a second bedroom. The...
                      01-07-2020, 16:19 PM
                    • Reply to Freeholder demanding a premium
                      by Disraeli-LLH
                      Sorry I forgot to add, this is the wording the Freeholder used in correspondence to his solicitor (he forwarded it on to us):
                      The owners of the ground floor flat wish to undertake certain structural alterations and have asked for our permission. We are minded to grant consent subject to the
                      ...
                      02-07-2020, 09:32 AM
                    • Reply to Freeholder demanding a premium
                      by Disraeli-LLH
                      Great thank you all, very helpful.
                      To give further background. The house is victorian, converted into 2 flats. We have the ground floor on a LLH. The freeholder has retained the upper parts and lets them on an AST. So unfortunately we cannot buy the freehold or set up a RTM.
                      The room we...
                      02-07-2020, 09:21 AM
                    • Reply to Freeholder demanding a premium
                      by scot22
                      Lawcruncher, I am always ready to admit I'm wrong and learn. I respect your knowledgeable posts.

                      My reasoning is that leaseholder buys the right to occupy a specific dwelling and, in some cases, land around. If lease holder changes causes an increase in value then Freeholder, in my view,...
                      02-07-2020, 08:59 AM
                    • Reply to Permission to let problems
                      by Lawcruncher
                      Please quote in full the clause(s) relating to underletting.
                      02-07-2020, 07:55 AM
                    • Permission to let problems
                      by sid1956
                      Hi
                      Wondered if someone could help with some advice please.

                      My long leasehold flat has been rented for a few years. By oversight prior permission was not sought from freeholder in advance. The lease says that prior permission must be sought and a fee of £45 paid for each sublet....
                      28-06-2020, 21:43 PM
                    • Reply to Freeholder demanding a premium
                      by Gordon999
                      How many flats in the block ? what is the total annual ground rent ? is it cheaper to buy the freehold title than pay a hefty premium ? .

                      The alternative option is set up RTM for your block and the RTM charge the premium and keep it.
                      02-07-2020, 07:26 AM
                    • Confused - E & M Management
                      by Flashback1966
                      Totally confused. Solicitor did a lease extension on an 80s purpose built flat in private development. The freeholder is the local council.

                      However, for reason, the statutory notices had been served on the local council and E&M management. They were pain to deal with.
                      ...
                      02-07-2020, 00:42 AM
                    • Reply to Confused - E & M Management
                      by Gordon999
                      You have to contact the local council to ask who is the agent for collecting ground rent.

                      Perhaps the solicitor is handling two different lease extensions and solicitor 's office staff got them mixed up.
                      02-07-2020, 07:19 AM
                    • Reply to Freeholder demanding a premium
                      by Lawcruncher
                      The freeholder has indicated they are minded to agree to the works

                      Depending on the words used (and the precise terms of the covenant), consent may already have been given. See Mount Eden Land Ltd v Prudential Assurance Co Ltd. Please set out the terms of the covenant and (if in writing)...
                      02-07-2020, 07:02 AM
                    Working...
                    X