Is freeholder consent enforecable for works before they became the freeholder

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Is freeholder consent enforecable for works before they became the freeholder

    Hi all. I can't find the answer to this anywhere. Can a new freeholder take enforecement action for something done before they purchased the freehold?

    The previous leaseholder of my flat made alterations in 2011. It is my understanding that the freeholder at the time wasn't easily contactable but there was/is a management company as party to the lease and the leaseholder got the management company's consent for the works (a side return extention internal layout change). I bought the flat in 2013. In 2014 the old (hard to contact) freeholder sold the freehold to a big property company and they have owned it since. In 2017 I extended my lease through the statutory process and this included the freeholder getting their own valuation done. We agreed a price with me paying their legal and valuation fees as expected.

    I'm now in the process of selling my flat and the buyers solicitor is getting very agitated that there isn't a freeholder's consent for the works and just the management company consent. So we may have to pay for an indemnity insurance. I'm certainly not asking the new freeholder for consent as I know they charged another leaseholder about £1,000 in legal fees for consent to planned building work a couple of years ago.

    My question is, could they take enforecement action or is it not allowed as this work was done before they aquired the freehold. Plus from doing a valuation of the flat in its current state as part of the lease extention is than an implicit consent for the works as no objection was raised then.

    Many thanks

    #2
    Your solicitor should have pointed out that a lease extension is a 'surrender & re-grant'. So your lease now includes the extension. (Buyer's solicitor probably already knows this, and I suspect this is a bargaining tool to get the price down.)
    To save them chiming in, JPKeates, Theartfullodger, Boletus, Mindthegap, Macromia, Holy Cow & Ted.E.Bear think the opposite of me on almost every subject.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by JK0 View Post
      Your solicitor should have pointed out that a lease extension is a 'surrender & re-grant'. So your lease now includes the extension.
      Exactly. The old lease is now a dead letter. When the new lease was granted all the covenants are applicable only from the commencement date.

      Originally posted by JK0 View Post
      Y(Buyer's solicitor probably already knows this, and I suspect this is a bargaining tool to get the price down.)
      More likely he has "forgotten" the law - as it seems your solicitor has.

      Comment


        #4
        Thanks very much both of you

        Comment

        Latest Activity

        Collapse

        • Reply to Building works & S20 process
          by Gordon999
          The S20 consultation with leaseholders is required for any planned works which exceed £250 cost per flat.

          If any planned works are quoted below £1000, you could place the order on the supplier with lowest quote. .

          If the freeholder is self- managing the building maintenance,...
          28-05-2022, 09:56 AM
        • Building works & S20 process
          by RichA
          Hi. I have a freehold after selling a leasehold flat in a block of 4 flats. We don't currently have a managing agent, so these duties currently fall to me (I am holding off appointing a managing agent whilst the leaseholders consider whether they want to RTM).

          The block needs some maintenance...
          21-05-2022, 17:20 PM
        • Share of feehold/shared service charges?
          by Stu1020
          Hi there,

          I'm new to the forum and looking for advice on a sticky freehold situation.

          I own a two-bed flat in a converted building with two one-beds. The lease states that a fair proportion is payable towards the service charge. However, there has been a running agreement of...
          20-05-2022, 11:39 AM
        • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
          by sgclacy
          You appear to have bought into the flat knowing at the time your share is 38% and having owned the flat feel that this is unjust.

          Did you raise any concerns questions at the time of purchase that in a three flat split you would be paying more than 33.33% . Could it be argued that the unfairness...
          28-05-2022, 09:04 AM
        • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
          by eagle2
          The cost of extending a lease is not a service charge expense so there is no reason to allocate it on the 38/31/31 basis, your offer to split those costs equally seems to be reasonable. It is up to the freeholder to decide what is fair and reasonable for the service charges and it is up to the other...
          28-05-2022, 05:29 AM
        • Reply to Old managing agents accounts
          by eagle2
          Unless the handover took place at the end of the financial year, it is the RTM's responsibility to produce the annual accounts. You could try making a formal complaint against the agent to supply copies of all supporting documents, it should belong to a redress scheme. The difficulty is that the agent...
          28-05-2022, 05:05 AM
        • Old managing agents accounts
          by jazzythumper
          Since obtaining the RTM and changing the managing agent, we have never been given full accounts / receipts for the previous year(s). We believe that as the old freeholder and leaser holder of one of the flats were represented by the same solicitor that prior to the sale of the freehold, we were subsidising...
          20-05-2022, 11:21 AM
        • Reply to Freehold confusion
          by CStevens
          davetg,

          The property should be registered so the land registry should hold a copy of the leases. You would need to look at the leases to see who is responsible for what but normally in a maisonette situation the freeholder would insure and maintain the structure, foundation and roof with...
          27-05-2022, 21:58 PM
        • Freehold confusion
          by davetg
          30 years ago I bought a flat from a friend. The freehold at the time was registered to my friend and the lady who owned the other flat. I understood at the time that I would replace the friend on the freehold but this never happened. This was not a problem until now as when work on the structure of...
          24-05-2022, 14:29 PM
        • Reply to Freehold confusion
          by CStevens
          Yeah i guess i would agree with that but, as you say, the value is only to the leaseholders and a freehold subject to 999 years is not worth a great deal of money to anyone other than the occupants and in fact, if the leases are drafted correctly, they should require the leaseholders to become members...
          27-05-2022, 21:52 PM
        Working...
        X