Buying a property and landlord is selling the freehold

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Buying a property and landlord is selling the freehold

    Good evening, i hope this is the correct forum. I am purchasing a flat and the seller is also the owner of the freehold of the building. It was agreed that he would grant me a lease of 175 yrs from Dec 2015. The house purchase was going within schedule until the seller communicated to me last friday that I should exchange by this Wednesday. This was quite alarming because there are still a few things that I would like to investigate on (e.g scheduled works and how much they will cost) and the deadline was never mentioned before. Following some chasing, it turned out that they are going to sell the freehold at an auction this thursday and i will have until mid November both for exchange and completion. It seemed a bit dodgy and I was wondering if are there any things worth considering/checking and how and if I should procede. Are there any possible bad implications for me? Thanks in advance for your help

    How many flats are there ? 2 or more, as the freeholder must give the leaseholders the option of purchasing the freehold, togeter with time limits to accept or refuse, but you may not be subject to knowing that information, nor need deemed it, as you are not a leaseholder.

    Again, how many flats are there ?

    It is very strange to offer you the freehold, then suddenly to want to sell the freehold from under you.
    Proceed with extreme caution.

    He is not granting you a lease of 175 yrs from Dec 2015.
    The lease already in existence, and was made in Dec 2015.
    You give him money, and he will transfer the existing lease to you ( assign )
    PLEASE remember, you are not buying a flat, you are buying a lease to allow you exclusive access the the rooms within that flat for 175 years from Dec 2015, and at the end of the lease, the freeholder is then the owner of the flat, and the occupants get their belongings, and leave, and no payment for the flat, as the flat was leased, not bought.

    Go read the lease as well, as that is what you are buying.

    Me, I would pull out, as an unknown person / company will be operating the running and maintenance ( probably badly ) of the flats if sold at auction. They only buy freeholds to MAKE money off the leaseholders.

    Run away.


      I don't see anything in the OP that suggests that the freehold was being offered with the sale of the flat. I also don't see any reason to assume that the current lease on the flat is what is being offered with the sale - perhaps these details can be clarified?

      For example, the current lease could potentially have very few years left to run which, under 'normal' circumstances would reduce the value of the lease. However, as the leaseholder is currently also the freeholder, he can grant a new lease (which can be given whatever length and start date he wants - perhaps the 2015 date will make the lease the same as other properties in the building?).

      I don't understand why the sale of the lease should be considered urgent because of the sale of the freehold. The current freeholder can grant himself the new lease before he sells the freehold regardless of whether you buy now or not. Perhaps the terms of the new lease aren't particularly favourable so the current freeholder doesn't want to be stuck owning a lease under the stated terms when he has to pay ground rent etc. to another freeholder?

      I would definitely be very suspicious.


      Latest Activity


      • Share of feehold/shared service charges?
        by Stu1020
        Hi there,

        I'm new to the forum and looking for advice on a sticky freehold situation.

        I own a two-bed flat in a converted building with two one-beds. The lease states that a fair proportion is payable towards the service charge. However, there has been a running agreement of...
        20-05-2022, 11:39 AM
      • Reply to Share of feehold/shared service charges?
        by eagle2
        I suggest that you ask the other 2 leaseholders to explain why they consider that the current allocation is fair. The freeholder has the right to review the allocation from time to time. Unfortunately, a "fair proportion" means that several alternatives would be considered reasonable to a...
        25-05-2022, 06:27 AM
      • RTM Hand Over Issues
        by martin15
        RTM handing over issues

        Our RTM companies comprise 4 blocks of 6 identical two bedroom flats and each block is registered at Companies House as a separate company.
        Following the acquisition date, it was discovered the former directors ignored legal advice and changed property management companies...
        23-05-2022, 19:36 PM
      • Reply to RTM Hand Over Issues
        by eagle2
        You appear to have a claim against the freeholder, not the individual companies, who are acting as agent for the freeholder. A Tribunal does not have the jurisdiction to deal with monies which should be handed over, it is a matter for the courts,
        25-05-2022, 06:16 AM
      • Reply to Old managing agents accounts
        by eagle2
        You do not appear to hold sufficient information to make a claim against the freeholder at this stage. I suggest that you apply to the FTT to challenge the charges. You would then be able to ask the Tribunal to direct the freeholder to disclose further information....
        25-05-2022, 06:06 AM
      • Old managing agents accounts
        by jazzythumper
        Since obtaining the RTM and changing the managing agent, we have never been given full accounts / receipts for the previous year(s). We believe that as the old freeholder and leaser holder of one of the flats were represented by the same solicitor that prior to the sale of the freehold, we were subsidising...
        20-05-2022, 11:21 AM
      • Reply to S20 - Quotes not valid for long enough for 30 day consult
        by Macromia
        With just two properties involved, and you being a resident, your best option would probably be to agree a time to talk through the proposed work and the need to skip the full 30 days that are supposed to be allowed for each stage of consultation.
        If the other leaseholder has any major concerns,...
        25-05-2022, 02:52 AM
      • S20 - Quotes not valid for long enough for 30 day consult
        by Flatman78
        Hi LZ Community

        Just wondering if anyone's had/having any issues with S20 and allowing leaseholder 30 days to review estimates, raise concerns etc.

        Building material prices have fluctuated massively since covid and brexit.
        with a combination of Brexit, impact from russia/ukraine...
        23-05-2022, 14:42 PM
      • Reply to Freehold confusion
        by sgclacy
        Your friend may not have to have his ID confirmed as the consideration will be far less than £5,000 and if he did form ID5 makes life a lot easier as it can be done via a video link...
        24-05-2022, 19:59 PM
      • Freehold confusion
        by davetg
        30 years ago I bought a flat from a friend. The freehold at the time was registered to my friend and the lady who owned the other flat. I understood at the time that I would replace the friend on the freehold but this never happened. This was not a problem until now as when work on the structure of...
        24-05-2022, 14:29 PM