Sharing cost

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Sharing cost

    Hello
    I am selling my flat. In order to do so I had to pay for a asbestos certificate which cost me £400+vat.
    Is it fair to ask the other freeholders to share the cost? The building has three flats and we share the freehold.
    Your views are appreciated.

    #2
    If it is for the communal area, the freeholder should have paid for this many years ago, and should have an asbestos management plan in place if any was found.

    If this is for your flat, I'd say that was your expense.

    Comment


      #3
      Thank you for your answer.

      Does someone know if there is anything I can do to make the other shareholders pay?

      Comment


        #4
        Can you confirm this is for the communal areas?

        If so, point out that they have been committing a criminal offence for many years Also, only the freeholder can commission the survey, as it will involve taking samples not just a visual check and leaseholders won't have the right to cut bits out of the communal area, however, small.

        Generally, this would be paid for from the service charge. If there is nothing that allows that the lease would probably be declared defective, if formally challenged and most people would proceed, at risk, on that basis, without formally applying to have the defective lease corrected.

        The freeholder will also be asked for a fire risk assessment. If you don't have one of those, you have been committing a criminal offence since 2013. (Technically it doesn't need to be in writing, but conveyancers will expect it to be.)

        Comment


          #5
          Yes, it is for the communal area

          Comment


            #6
            The problem is that you failed to do this when you were required to do it That means you are now against time pressures. You are probably going to have to fund this yourself, even though it should have been a service charge item, split equally amongst all the leaseholders.

            Comment


              #7
              It should be a shared expense payable by the freeholders or leaseholders depending on the wording of the lease. You should try to persuade the others in the block to contribute failing which you may need to threaten legal action.

              Comment


                #8
                The leaseholders are the joint freeholders! If the lease requires the freeholder to pay, there really should have been a formal agreement that freeholder costs be split equally.

                Is this one of these leases that tries to avoid having service charges?

                Worst case is that the joint freeholders are simply jointly and severally responsible, in which case an external creditor could go after any one individually, so I don't see how one could go after the others. Hopefully there is something to the effect that they are responsible for one third each and only for that third, or there is a proper service charge provision.

                The cost of this is likely to be a few hundred pounds. Taking legal action could delay things, and the fact that it has to be taken could put buyer off.

                Whilst it is a criminal offence not to have had the survey done, there is no law that requires it to be provided to prospective buyers. This is probably the result of a question on form LPE1, and it is quite possible to simply say not available or refuse to answer the whole form. Buyers may be put off by this, but it is their choice. In practice, the main risk to the buyer is that there may be asbestos in poor condition, and they may get hit with large service charges to have it removed or made safe. The buyer themselves, may never have thought of asking the question; it is just a standard conveyancing question for flats.

                When was the building built, and if converted, when converted? Those might give a clue as to whether there is likely to be asbestos, and a big risk to the buyer.

                Comment


                  #9
                  The success in seeking reimbursement will depend more on the style and approach of your letter than the actual law.

                  i would write to the freeholder stating that you commissioned the asbestos report and as a consequence have undertaken a task which they should have undertaken - therefore so that they can use that report to confirm to the insurers that an asbestos survey has been done you ask that they credit your service charge account with the cost or reimburse you 2/3 of the cost - by not having an asbestos report it MAY have invalidated their insurance cover

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by sgclacy View Post
                    i would write to the freeholder
                    The OP would be writing to himself! He is one third of the freeholder.

                    This is a dysfunctional share of the freehold case.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      One important point is that the whole case for sharing is based on the fact that the freeholders have failed to perform a statutory duty.

                      If the OP wanted something from them that they weren't obliged to have obtained anyway, and which is not something that the lease requires them to provide, it would be for the OPs benefit and the freeholder could charge them the full cost, or more . There would still be a moral case for sharing, but not a legal one. (Freeholders do charge for providing this sort of information, even when they do possess it. They are under no obligation to provide it, so can set any price that the market will bear.)

                      Currently the freeholders, including the OP, in theory at least, risk fines of of up to £20,000 and six month prison sentences.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by sgclacy View Post
                        The success in seeking reimbursement will depend more on the style and approach of your letter than the actual law.

                        i would write to the freeholder stating that you commissioned the asbestos report and as a consequence have undertaken a task which they should have undertaken -
                        I agree, the other 2 leaseholders and joint freeholders should be approached and asked to contribute towards the cost in exchange for a copy of the report which they will need.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Thanks for your replies.
                          The building was build at the end of 19 century and converted into flats in the 80s

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Affinity View Post
                            Thanks for your replies.
                            The building was build at the end of 19 century and converted into flats in the 80s
                            The initial build will be low risk for asbestos. The 1980s conversion was after limitations started being imposed, but might not be quite late enough. Of course, earlier maintenance may have added asbestos.

                            Comment

                            Latest Activity

                            Collapse

                            • Leasehold remortgage
                              by LC4OA
                              I’m in the process of remortgaging my leasehold property. I’m in dispute with the managing agents over historic section 20 notice of intention failures for two sets of major works and for me not paying into a contingency fund, for which there is no provision in my lease. The arrears equal £3k....
                              25-01-2020, 17:06 PM
                            • Reply to Leasehold remortgage
                              by LC4OA
                              A reserve fund is for major works and is provided for in the lease. However, agents are trying to take £1500 for a contingency fund which they say covers risk assessments and surveys although assessments/surveys that have been undertaken have also been demanded under separate headings in service charge....
                              25-01-2020, 23:31 PM
                            • Help - Loft Demise - Lease - Trespassing??
                              by Mrmckenzie74
                              Hi all!

                              Hope you're all well?

                              I'm new here so I hope you don't mind my direct approach.
                              I may be in a bit of a pickle and could really do with a bit of advice on the following...

                              Snap shot:

                              Top floor flat

                              Purpose built maisonettes...
                              24-01-2020, 16:51 PM
                            • Reply to Help - Loft Demise - Lease - Trespassing??
                              by Mrmckenzie74
                              ​​​​Are you sure on above, as Lawcruncher usually says if the hatch is in your flat, the loft belongs to you ( which I always disagree with.)

                              - Apologies, I said freeholder instead of leaseholder...

                              Regarding a hatch in your ceiling - where else can it be put. Build...
                              25-01-2020, 22:54 PM
                            • Section 20 Major Works: undisclosed connection between landlord and winning bidder
                              by AB2017
                              Hi, our landlord is running a section 20 consultation for a major works contract. He obtained three quotes, one very high, the second very slightly cheaper and the third very low. The third was disqualified, purportedly on the grounds that they must have misunderstood the job. The second bidder has...
                              25-01-2020, 22:33 PM
                            • Getting rid of a build in wardrobe
                              by annaV
                              Hi all,

                              I am in the process of buyig a leasefold flat (110 years remaining). The master bedroom has a build in wardrobe, which is shown on the footprint. The flat has a second box room, which I intend turning into a walk-in closet as I live on my own and have plenty of things I need to...
                              25-01-2020, 14:12 PM
                            • Reply to Getting rid of a build in wardrobe
                              by scot22
                              As a general rule I say always ask. Then you have been open and that should avoid any future problem. For any situation good communication is beneficial. If you ask before exchanging contracts and there are any issues you are forewarned and possibly negotiate price reduction.
                              25-01-2020, 22:23 PM
                            • Reply to Leasehold remortgage
                              by AndrewDod
                              What's the difference between a reserve fund (which you say you paid) and a contingency fund (which you say is not provided for in lease)?

                              Who else paid for stuff - we presume the other lessees in the building are out of pocket somehow?

                              What timescale -- was this 10 years ago,...
                              25-01-2020, 20:57 PM
                            • Directors Appointment and change of registered address
                              by ZIGGYVIGGY
                              Sequence of events:

                              2 directors ( both leaseholders) incorporated an RTM. RTM application was made successfully with support of 51 percent lease holders back in 2016

                              1. Freeholders managing agent was asked to leave. At this point reserves held were £55k and service charge...
                              12-01-2020, 16:46 PM
                            • Reply to Directors Appointment and change of registered address
                              by ZIGGYVIGGY
                              Mr.Soffit thanks again for the elaborate email and apologies for a delayed response.
                              We are still waiting for the bank to revert. They say the new mandate is being processes. If the bank sorts this out in the next few days that will save us from pain of going thru setting up another account....
                              25-01-2020, 20:33 PM
                            Working...
                            X