RTM AGM minutes accuracy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    RTM AGM minutes accuracy

    Hi,

    We are an RTM looking after 209 flats.

    We just published the minutes for the AGM that we had recently, in which were written by the secretary and approved by the board.

    I've had a query from a member saying their words have been misrepresented and asked us to update the minutes from the meeting.

    It seems he is not happy with the wording and wishes us to add in another sentence in on what he said

    I'm just wondering what we are options are. Are we supposed to write word for word what people have said in the meeting, or just summarize it.

    It's not possible for someone to record every single word of the meeting.

    If we change it, are we opening up a can of worms for others to keep challenging what has been said.

    Apologies if I've put this in the wrong group. I couldn't work out where the most suitable place was to put this




    #2
    Legally, you are only required to record the decisions made, but in practice you would expected to summarise the discussion as well.

    Normally AGM minutes would not be approved until the next AGM.

    RTMs don't actually have AGMs, as their Articles are set by statute and don't provide for AGMs.,

    AGMs have very little formal business and generally don't make decisions other than about re-appointing directors, appointment of auditors and how the auditor's remuneration is decided.

    Several national limited by guarantee companies now record AGMs and make the recordings available.

    Comment


      #3
      To be clear, The board have approved them and then published them. I’m just wondering if I need to keep republishing.

      This AGM ends up having wider discussions, as work required in some years runs into six figures plus.

      We have five board members and all do this voluntarily. Recording the minutes and then scribing them would take a significant amount of time

      Comment


        #4
        They are not transcripts.

        However, if you have dissenters it can be very important to them that their views are recorded, even though they might actually be in a part of the meeting that isn't really part of the meeting.

        It tends to be rather more important to minute directors' meeting properly as a dissenter may be the only person complying with the law, and it can important for them that they can prove they weren't party to something illegal. AGMs simply shouldn't be making that sort of risky decision, in the first place.

        Ideally you should stick to the agenda in general meetings, but I appreciate that can be very difficult.

        As I said, the normal practice for AGM is to not sign the previous minutes until the next meeting has considered them and had an opportunity to request corrections.

        Comment


          #5
          Thanks for this.

          I can't agree about not discussing anything else.

          As an example, the service charge needed to increase significantly over the next three years to pay for the outside decorating.

          We gave the Members the option of whether they wanted the charge to be raised steadily, or if they wanted to pay a lump sum in three years time. It gave everyone a chance to debate it and vote on the options.

          There's also been votes for changes in the Articles

          In AOB, many issues come up additionally.

          Surely, those you are unable to attend should be able to see what was agreed before the next AGM.

          We have therefore published the minutes. I don't think it's right to keep everyone in the dark.

          I'm just trying to understand whether I would need to republish again, if they were disputed.

          Comment


            #6
            Well people don't like being misrepresented (including by fundamental omission) - so if that is the case and you have put out the minutes you should correct and inform the recipients. If it is trivial nonsense then just attach their letter to the minutes for information.

            I hope your mechanism for changing charges is consistent with the lease. You can't agree in a meeting, no matter how debated, to ignore the lease.

            Comment


              #7
              You cannot change the articles of an RTM, so the motions to change them are void.

              To the extent that you could change them, it would have to be done as special resolution, which means that the exact text of the resolution must be included in the calling notice of the meeting, as special business and the meeting notice would need to be at least 21 days. The meeting itself can only make a binary choice: accept the change or reject it. The vote requires a 75% majority.

              A resolution on whether to collect a sinking fund, even assuming the lease allows one and doesn't make the choice for you, should be noted, as special business in the calling notice. Ideally the exact question should be included, but it is sufficient to state the general nature of the business for this (but not for changing the articles). This is also special business, as it is not normal business for an AGM (not that RTMs have AGMs since their model articles were changed).

              AOB is actually any other business of an AGM, not anything the floor might like to discuss. People often have an informal session, after the actual AGM, which is advisory only It is dangerous to treat such discussion as formal, it forces people to make snap decisions.

              Comment


                #8
                Grass is Greener,

                You could accommodate the extra comments and ask for them to be added as an addendum to the minutes

                Comment


                  #9
                  In answer to your question, the minutes should record a fair summary of what was discussed at the meeting. The minutes can be issued at any time prior to the next meeting when the minutes should be approved by the members. Some RTMs issue the minutes with the notice for the next meeting. By then of course, most members have forgotten what was discussed at the last meeting.

                  When somebody challenges the summary, the board should consider the comments and decide whether or not the summary needs to be changed. If a member wishes for his disagreement to be recorded, you should do so by attempting to agree a summary of his comments and including a note in the minutes of the next meeting.

                  I agree with you that AOB allows other subjects to be raised and discussed at a meeting but you are entering hot water with some of the subjects.

                  The system of charging leaseholders is set out in the lease and the terms of the lease cannot be changed at a meeting of members. It is extremely important for the RTM to charge strictly according to the lease.

                  Voluntary arrangements to collect some form of reserve fund are best avoided. It would need to be kept apart from the service charge accounts and there could be tax implications and it could affect the dormant status of the company.

                  The lease also sets out when payments are due. Whilst you may agree voluntary arrangements with individual leaseholders, a majority of members cannot decide how others should pay. If leaseholders decide to pay monies in advance, it should be recorded as a liability owing to leaseholders.

                  As others have stated, there is a formal procedure to follow if you wish to change the Articles.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Although, for normal companies, the articles can be changed by correctly following the formal procedure, those for RTMs are fixed by statue:

                    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2...ulation/2/made

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Wow, where to start on this one. Thank you for all your comments

                      We do employ a managing agent, who give us guidance and also use their legal department where necessary.

                      We ensure that we comply with the lease.

                      We are looking to change the Articles and know the procedure of it needing to get 75% of the vote using a special resolution.

                      To give you a bit of background. The freeholder used to employ an agent to look after the buildings. We were unhappy with the way it was being managed and wanted to have a say.

                      Therefore we got the numbers together and formed an RTM in 2016.

                      Whether we need to have an AGM is not the point. The reason for setting up the RTM was for members to have their say. We therefore have an AGM, with an AOB for people to have their say.

                      We put a 10 year plan together of the work that was required to comply with the lease. The place was mismanaged by the previous agent and hadn’t been decorated internally or externally for about 15 years, which was in breach of the lease. The intercom system failed and needed to replaced and the lifts are on their last legs

                      We realised the reserves would not cover the next five years and the service charge would have to be increased.

                      We therefore had an indicative vote (not a special resolution) at the AGM, to give the members the options of how we increase the charge. We said that we would abide by the vote, even though there wasn’t a legal requirement.

                      There were three options. One to keep it the same, and pay a one off fee in three years time. Another to increase it evenly over the years. The third was to to part increase and have a smaller one off fee later.

                      The challenge to the minutes wasn’t on something that was deliberately omitted. The conversation was summarised. I don’t think the minutes has misrepresented that person, although they obviously disagree.

                      It seems our options are to either republish, or correct the notes at the next AGM before asking for them to be approved.

                      Unless there’s another option, that I’ve missed.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        All your meetings are actually EGMs, and should have a full agenda in the calling notice.

                        You can't change the articles, even with a 75% vote, as the RTM legislation requires you to use specific articles. What change were you trying to make/

                        The danger with AOB is that it doesn't allow people to know whether it is important to attend.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Also, don't rely on managing agents to be fully aware of the law.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            A managing agent ought to know the law in so far as it affects the service or advice which he is giving.

                            The Articles allow special resolutions to be passed and those usually apply to the constitution of the Company.

                            As long as the lease allows you to hold a reserve fund, there is no reason why you cannot seek the views of the members before the directors make a decision regarding the actual amounts to be demanded.

                            The simplest option with the minutes is to inform the member that you disagree with his comments and that you will add a note summarising his objection to be added to the minutes when they are approved at the next meeting.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              The RTM Companies Regulations 2009 includes clause 5(s) for which the wording states:

                              "to establish and maintain capital reserves, management funds and any form of sinking fund in order to pay, or contribute towards, all costs, fees, and other expenses incurred in the implementation of the company’s objects" ;

                              Comment

                              Latest Activity

                              Collapse

                              • Isn't there any obligation to be insured?
                                by Sarah17
                                Hi All,
                                I recently bought a flat and learned since that the flat above is a regulated tenancy. The current tenant has moved in 1972. The flat is in a very shabby state, and I am worried about it (safety concerns, fire risk...etc). I wrote to the landlord and didn't receive any answer yet. A few...
                                16-01-2022, 17:57 PM
                              • Reply to Isn't there any obligation to be insured?
                                by vmart
                                The only insurances that are legally required in the UK are Employers' Liability; and motor insurance.

                                I suggest you write to the landlord again following up on your previous letter and notifying them of the leak. Depending upon the cause of the leak it may be covered by buildings' insurance....
                                16-01-2022, 22:03 PM
                              • Reply to Demised Roof Terrace - landlord permission
                                by Gordon999
                                You should consider buying the freehold and become the landlord.

                                If the sun awning is portable and free standing, you are not making any alteration or addition to the building. . .
                                16-01-2022, 21:19 PM
                              • Demised Roof Terrace - landlord permission
                                by pmorton
                                We have a roof terrace, demised to us in the lease, on which I wish to place a freestanding rectangular sun awning. There is no structural problem, it is self supporting and weighted appropriately against wind and we have planning permission. The landlord says it is forbidden under a clause in the lease...
                                13-01-2022, 19:18 PM
                              • Reply to New Government proposals re leasehold reform
                                by sgclacy
                                If a draft lease is presented to the proposed grantee and there is an initial rent of say £350 per annum then I fail to see why, notwithstanding that it is greater than 0.1% that this should be interfered with, Neither should clauses that seek to keep its purchasing power the same during the term be...
                                16-01-2022, 20:56 PM
                              • New Government proposals re leasehold reform
                                by perigee
                                I see that there are proposals to simplify the extension/enfranchisement procedures and reduce the costs for lessees, including abolishing marriage values. I appreciate that these are early days but is there any guidance from professionals acting for landlords - as distinct from lessees - on these...
                                12-01-2022, 17:53 PM
                              • Reply to Isn't there any obligation to be insured?
                                by scot22
                                We had a leak and owner not insured. Fortunately did the honourable think and paid costs.
                                Insurance for flats can be difficult. Ours excludes water damage except by storm etc.
                                If you can prove negligence I would make a claim on small claims. Obviously ask them to pay before legal route....
                                16-01-2022, 19:56 PM
                              • Reply to New Government proposals re leasehold reform
                                by Sussex818
                                The proposition is that all new lease extensions will be 990 years after reform and there will also be a standardized calculator to work out the cost of a lease extension which will make it much simpler and hopefully swerve the huge legal bills which leaseholders have to pay for a statuatory lease ...
                                16-01-2022, 19:00 PM
                              • Reply to Service charge arrears
                                by lampshade
                                I have never seen anything that would suggest anything other than a total lack of funding, due to extra willy nilly inspections and the like that this new MA keeps carrying out, but no work actually being done.
                                16-01-2022, 16:03 PM
                              • Reply to Section 20 costs
                                by lampshade
                                Thnks. One of the biggest issues in my mind is that we are not party to the management contract between the FH and this new company. The Freeholder too the Managing away from the company that had done it since the flats were new and gave it, to themselves (120 miles away) they were pretty useless, eg....works...
                                16-01-2022, 16:00 PM
                              Working...
                              X